Indeed ... incredibly disappointing and weak, effeminate really, groveling.
You get the impression that they're hoping that after the dust clears they'll resume seeking a practical agreement.
I just think its consistent with their premises, if you really believe Leo is the Pope (heck, even if you're not dogmatic about it but you're 90% sure he's the pope) but yet you are going to resist certain commands of his, than the way Fr. Pagliarani is doing it is the way to do it, being as respectful as possible while clarifying the points of disagreement.
I'm kind of surprised you're mad at them for being consistent with their own premises. Usually you get mad at people because they aren't.
Now, of course I understand you're a Sedevacantist, and don't believe these people have any authority, so flaunting the supposed excommunication makes sense *for you*, but you'd actually be the first to call someone a heretic for having no respect for the Pope while calling him a true Pope.
Topic: SSPX to Pope July 3 (Read 348 times)