Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Sr. Mary Elisabeth Explains  (Read 4926 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline X

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 613
  • Reputation: +609/-55
  • Gender: Male
Sr. Mary Elisabeth Explains
« on: April 05, 2019, 05:37:15 PM »
  • Thanks!7
  • No Thanks!0
  • http://op54rosary.ning.com/forum/topics/sister-mary-elisabeth-s-letter-of-explanation-to-the-parents


    M
    4th April 2019

    Dear Parents,

    As promised to some of you, I would like to give you a summary of what has motivated my resigning
    from the Society of Saint Pius X twenty-five years after having received the habit of the Oblate sisters.

    Since the April 2017 acceptation by the Society of the “marriage deal” offered by Pope Francis, I have
    had the conviction that the Society was no longer protecting the faithful from the modernist Church.
    More and more we were told that the Catholic Church and the official Church are one and the same
    thing, both being visible, whereas the profession of the true Faith is the first criterion for being a
    member of the Catholic Church, a criterion that modernists bishops, for instance, do not match. I
    started to feel very uneasy with belonging to the Society, because it meant supporting these new ideas
    that Archbishop Lefebvre had clearly refuted and against which he had warned us many times in plain
    language.

    I was advised to wait until the next General Chapter of the Society, due to take place in July 2018,
    before making any life-changing decision. Which I did. There was an expectation that a new Superior
    General would reverse the doomed course of the Society.

    However, I was well aware that the Superior General’s mission is to implement the decisions of the
    Chapter. Therefore, I waited until the Acts of the Chapter were published to make up my mind. On
    September 18th we were sent extracts of the Acts of the Chapter. They concerned the marriages, the
    Society’s relations with Rome and the prelature. At the end of this reading, all my doubts were gone
    and I was sure that I had to leave the Society of Saint Pius X if I wanted to remain faithful to the
    teaching and recommendations of our Founder. The asking of the delegation of the modernist bishops
    for marriages was made mandatory for all priests of the Society; we were recommended to practice a
    “charitable attitude” towards any bishop, clergy or faithful without qualification, as long as they were
    “friendly towards tradition”. This opened the door to anything and everything in terms of
    collaboration with clergy and laity who were not fully committed to the defence of Catholic Tradition.
    You know which fruit these deliberately vague notions bore at Saint Michael’s School when the
    Headmaster invited the conciliar diocesan bishop to lead the children’s prayer in our chapel, after
    having collected for him a spiritual bouquet meant at expressing “our gratitude”. Gratitude for what?
    For having said at an interfaith forum that Catholic Christians do not deny the moral freedom to
    choose for or against the Truth of Christ1? 

    A statement which is religious liberty in a nutshell, in total
    contradiction with Our Lord’s words (Mark, 16-16). 
    Or gratitude for having asked Muslims to pray (to
    whom?) for us2?

    But to return to the chronology of the events, on that evening of 18th September I decided to leave
    the Society. This was however the end of the first week of the new academic year and it was obvious
    that leaving at that point was not an option. So, for the sake of the children and of you, dear Parents,
    I decided to stay until the end of the academic year.

    One day in February, the Headmaster told me that he had invited the modernist bishop of Portsmouth
    to come and visit the school. He asked me to organize a spiritual bouquet for him, which I accepted to
    do, having no notion that it was meant “in gratitude”. I decided nevertheless to prepare the children
    to be wary of the bishop by telling them that he did a few things that showed he needed prayers and
    sacrifices like saying the New Mass and distributing Holy Communion in the hand.

    At the next staff meeting, Father Brucciani told the staff that not only Bishop Egan was to visit the
    school, but that he would furthermore lead the children in the prayer of the Rosary in the chapel. I
    put my hand up and said that I would not go and pray with the diocesan bishop in our chapel. Although
    both the Headmaster and the Superior of District spent a lot of time and energy in trying to convince
    the Sisters that there was no problem with their plan, on 8th March none of the Sisters turned up in
    chapel for the bishop-led Rosary, as each of them, of her own accord, had decided that she could not
    in conscience attend that event. This abstention was to trigger more pressure being put on the Sisters.

    This would have been something to offer up and I would still be at the school if things had stayed at
    that.

    However, after Bishop Egan’s visit the Headmaster told the children in a sermon on Wednesday that
    the Bishop of Portsmouth was a man of good will, that he was not bad. Now if you say to a child that
    a berry is not bad, she will put it in her mouth, because it means it is good, or at least harmless. But a
    modernist bishop is not a harmless preacher (see above). He carries about him all of the harmful spirit
    of Vatican II, destructive of the Catholic Faith. At that juncture, it became clear to me that the
    children’s trust was captured for the benefit of a person unworthy of it, who had all the trimmings of
    a Catholic bishop, but not the Faith of a Catholic bishop. How can children discern the fraud? On the
    other hand, how could the children who knew about the problem of Vatican II understand that one of
    its faithful spokesmen had led their prayer in our Catholic chapel? As Father John Brucciani had
    ordered me a little before not to talk to the children about Bishop Egan, I realized that I would not be
    able to protect the children’s Faith any more from this subtle poisoning of their Faith and the slow
    subversion of their trust in either their parents, the Sisters or their priests, depending on whom their
    limited understanding would bring them to side with.

    In such circuмstances my presence at the school made no more sense, as I was not there to teach
    academics in the first place, but to teach the Catholic Faith and foster Catholic spiritual and moral life
    in my young charges.

    Additionally, every day of my presence on campus in the habit of the Oblates of the Society was a tacit
    approval of the school leadership, which had become at odds with my conscience.

    Consequently, I decided to leave the school during the Holy Week, so as to have time to prepare my
    very young pupils and the whole primary school to my departure. I told the Headmaster unofficially
    of my decision a little ahead of time of its realisation so that he, too, could have some time (five weeks)
    to get everything ready for the start of Trinity term.

    On 25th March I posted my resignation to the Superior General of the Society.

    On 27th March, the Second Assistant to the Superior General came to our school, listen to what I had
    to say about the situation in our school and parish in general and, more specifically, about the “Bishop
    Egan’s crisis”. He offered me to take back my resignation, which was out of question. His conclusion 
    was that I had to leave “as soon as possible”. The next morning, I was not allowed to go to school in
    order to avoid creating a stir.

    On 30th March I left the school and the New Society of Saint Pius X in order to be able to observe
    faithfully what I had promised to observe on the day of my engagement in that dearly beloved Society
    as founded by Archbishop Lefebvre.

    At the moment I am most charitably accommodated by faithful of Father King’s Saint Gregory’s
    Mission in Southport. I can attend Holy Mass daily and prepare my next step in the religious life.
    I would like to thank you all from the bottom of my heart for your truly wonderful support in the last
    days of my presence at Saint Michael’s School. It helped me go through those painful hours. I was
    struck by the grief that many of you expressed in one way or another. This made me more aware of
    the strong bond of charity that unites us in Our Lord Jesus Christ and that we have woven together
    over the last fifteen years. This bond remains untouched, it has perhaps even gained in strength while
    we were sharing in the pain of an abrupt separation. I keep you all in my prayers, especially during
    Holy Mass. Please, keep praying for me, too!

    May Our Blessed Lady keep you all in Her Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart which will always be our
    meeting point.

    Yours most gratefully,
    Sister Mary-Elizabeth

    http://www.portsmouthdiocese.org.uk/bishop/docs/20171109-BoP-Talk-I...
    http://www.portsmouthdiocese.org.uk/enews/mosque-visit.php Note that Bishop Egan wrote “I joined them
    [the Muslims in the mosque] for Friday prayers”.


    Offline X

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 613
    • Reputation: +609/-55
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sr. Mary Elisabeth Explains
    « Reply #1 on: April 05, 2019, 06:21:32 PM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • "At the end of this reading, all my doubts were gone and I was sure that I had to leave the Society of Saint Pius X if I wanted to remain faithful to the teaching and recommendations of our Founder."

    :applause:


    Offline M and Liz

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 19
    • Reputation: +14/-2
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Sr. Mary Elisabeth Explains
    « Reply #2 on: April 05, 2019, 07:59:38 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thank you, X, for posting Sister's letter! 
    Prayers for all the nuns helping the SSPX in any capacity to have such faith and courage! 
    🙏🙏🙏🙏

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41868
    • Reputation: +23920/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sr. Mary Elisabeth Explains
    « Reply #3 on: April 05, 2019, 08:40:05 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • What a refreshing letter, and so well written.

    Anyone who's been around the SSPX 25+ years knows very well how different the modern neo-SSPX is from the SSPX they initially joined.  It's no wonder that 3 of the 5 original Resistance priests (of the Vienna declaration) were at the seminary in my own day roughly 30 years ago and had been well taught by Bishop Williamson.  Fathers Pfeiffer, Hewko, Chazal ... they were all seminarians at the same time I was there and under the influence of Bishop Williamson, who was still the rector at STAS.  And Father Ringrose was an independent priest who was active around the same time.

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 10306
    • Reputation: +6216/-1742
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sr. Mary Elisabeth Explains
    « Reply #4 on: April 05, 2019, 09:50:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • God bless all those nuns for not going to hear that "bishop" speak.  They have their priorities in order - to teach children the Faith, which the new-sspx will not allow any longer.  Woe to the school officials for the future loss of Faith of these innocent ones!  Woe to the parents who keep their children in such a school!  Woe to the new-sspx for feeding both students and laity to the heretical modernist lions!  

    I hope the rest of the nuns will take the final step and leave the school for good.  For the good of their souls, they need to depart from that spiritual vacuum!


    Offline Hopeful

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 1
    • Reputation: +1/-1
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Sr. Mary Elisabeth Explains
    « Reply #5 on: April 05, 2019, 11:47:54 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  •  :applause:God bless you, Sister.

    Offline Incredulous

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8901
    • Reputation: +8675/-849
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sr. Mary Elisabeth Explains
    « Reply #6 on: April 06, 2019, 01:01:40 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  •       

       

        "That is correct...  I was told...  
        From April 6th, there will be no more internet service at SSPX convents...
        Lights out at 7:00 instead of 9:00PM and screening of family correspondence.
        And... it may be necessary to assign them extra priests to stop this schismatic infection."
    "Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it underfoot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Our Lord Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor but a destroyer."  St. Francis of Assisi

    Offline X

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 613
    • Reputation: +609/-55
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sr. Mary Elisabeth Explains
    « Reply #7 on: April 06, 2019, 04:25:43 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • http://op54rosary.ning.com/m/discussion?id=5691517%3ATopic%3A512315

    “Please could you pray for parents being interviewed by Fr John Brucciani. They have been warned that their place in the school and parish is jeapordised because they withdrew their children the morning of the conciliar Bishop's visit. The new school policy that parents must sign says that parents must respect the Pope and Diocesan Bishop.  Please pray that they do and say the thing that God wants.”


    Offline Chrysostom

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 10
    • Reputation: +6/-24
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sr. Mary Elisabeth Explains
    « Reply #8 on: April 06, 2019, 05:04:26 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!8
  • http://op54rosary.ning.com/forum/topics/sister-mary-elisabeth-s-letter-of-explanation-to-the-parents


    M
    4th April 2019

    Dear Parents,

    As promised to some of you, I would like to give you a summary of what has motivated my resigning
    from the Society of Saint Pius X twenty-five years after having received the habit of the Oblate sisters.

    Since the April 2017 acceptation by the Society of the “marriage deal” offered by Pope Francis, I have
    had the conviction that the Society was no longer protecting the faithful from the modernist Church.
    More and more we were told that the Catholic Church and the official Church are one and the same
    thing, both being visible, whereas the profession of the true Faith is the first criterion for being a
    member of the Catholic Church, a criterion that modernists bishops, for instance, do not match. I
    started to feel very uneasy with belonging to the Society, because it meant supporting these new ideas
    that Archbishop Lefebvre had clearly refuted and against which he had warned us many times in plain
    language.

    I was advised to wait until the next General Chapter of the Society, due to take place in July 2018,
    before making any life-changing decision. Which I did. There was an expectation that a new Superior
    General would reverse the doomed course of the Society.

    However, I was well aware that the Superior General’s mission is to implement the decisions of the
    Chapter. Therefore, I waited until the Acts of the Chapter were published to make up my mind. On
    September 18th we were sent extracts of the Acts of the Chapter. They concerned the marriages, the
    Society’s relations with Rome and the prelature. At the end of this reading, all my doubts were gone
    and I was sure that I had to leave the Society of Saint Pius X if I wanted to remain faithful to the
    teaching and recommendations of our Founder. The asking of the delegation of the modernist bishops
    for marriages was made mandatory for all priests of the Society; we were recommended to practice a
    “charitable attitude” towards any bishop, clergy or faithful without qualification, as long as they were
    “friendly towards tradition”. This opened the door to anything and everything in terms of
    collaboration with clergy and laity who were not fully committed to the defence of Catholic Tradition.
    You know which fruit these deliberately vague notions bore at Saint Michael’s School when the
    Headmaster invited the conciliar diocesan bishop to lead the children’s prayer in our chapel, after
    having collected for him a spiritual bouquet meant at expressing “our gratitude”. Gratitude for what?
    For having said at an interfaith forum that Catholic Christians do not deny the moral freedom to
    choose for or against the Truth of Christ1?

    A statement which is religious liberty in a nutshell, in total
    contradiction with Our Lord’s words (Mark, 16-16).
    Or gratitude for having asked Muslims to pray (to
    whom?) for us2?

    But to return to the chronology of the events, on that evening of 18th September I decided to leave
    the Society. This was however the end of the first week of the new academic year and it was obvious
    that leaving at that point was not an option. So, for the sake of the children and of you, dear Parents,
    I decided to stay until the end of the academic year.

    One day in February, the Headmaster told me that he had invited the modernist bishop of Portsmouth
    to come and visit the school. He asked me to organize a spiritual bouquet for him, which I accepted to
    do, having no notion that it was meant “in gratitude”. I decided nevertheless to prepare the children
    to be wary of the bishop by telling them that he did a few things that showed he needed prayers and
    sacrifices like saying the New Mass and distributing Holy Communion in the hand.

    At the next staff meeting, Father Brucciani told the staff that not only Bishop Egan was to visit the
    school, but that he would furthermore lead the children in the prayer of the Rosary in the chapel. I
    put my hand up and said that I would not go and pray with the diocesan bishop in our chapel. Although
    both the Headmaster and the Superior of District spent a lot of time and energy in trying to convince
    the Sisters that there was no problem with their plan, on 8th March none of the Sisters turned up in
    chapel for the bishop-led Rosary, as each of them, of her own accord, had decided that she could not
    in conscience attend that event. This abstention was to trigger more pressure being put on the Sisters.

    This would have been something to offer up and I would still be at the school if things had stayed at
    that.

    However, after Bishop Egan’s visit the Headmaster told the children in a sermon on Wednesday that
    the Bishop of Portsmouth was a man of good will, that he was not bad. Now if you say to a child that
    a berry is not bad, she will put it in her mouth, because it means it is good, or at least harmless. But a
    modernist bishop is not a harmless preacher (see above). He carries about him all of the harmful spirit
    of Vatican II, destructive of the Catholic Faith. At that juncture, it became clear to me that the
    children’s trust was captured for the benefit of a person unworthy of it, who had all the trimmings of
    a Catholic bishop, but not the Faith of a Catholic bishop. How can children discern the fraud? On the
    other hand, how could the children who knew about the problem of Vatican II understand that one of
    its faithful spokesmen had led their prayer in our Catholic chapel? As Father John Brucciani had
    ordered me a little before not to talk to the children about Bishop Egan, I realized that I would not be
    able to protect the children’s Faith any more from this subtle poisoning of their Faith and the slow
    subversion of their trust in either their parents, the Sisters or their priests, depending on whom their
    limited understanding would bring them to side with.

    In such circuмstances my presence at the school made no more sense, as I was not there to teach
    academics in the first place, but to teach the Catholic Faith and foster Catholic spiritual and moral life
    in my young charges.

    Additionally, every day of my presence on campus in the habit of the Oblates of the Society was a tacit
    approval of the school leadership, which had become at odds with my conscience.

    Consequently, I decided to leave the school during the Holy Week, so as to have time to prepare my
    very young pupils and the whole primary school to my departure. I told the Headmaster unofficially
    of my decision a little ahead of time of its realisation so that he, too, could have some time (five weeks)
    to get everything ready for the start of Trinity term.

    On 25th March I posted my resignation to the Superior General of the Society.

    On 27th March, the Second Assistant to the Superior General came to our school, listen to what I had
    to say about the situation in our school and parish in general and, more specifically, about the “Bishop
    Egan’s crisis”. He offered me to take back my resignation, which was out of question. His conclusion
    was that I had to leave “as soon as possible”. The next morning, I was not allowed to go to school in
    order to avoid creating a stir.

    On 30th March I left the school and the New Society of Saint Pius X in order to be able to observe
    faithfully what I had promised to observe on the day of my engagement in that dearly beloved Society
    as founded by Archbishop Lefebvre.

    At the moment I am most charitably accommodated by faithful of Father King’s Saint Gregory’s
    Mission in Southport. I can attend Holy Mass daily and prepare my next step in the religious life.
    I would like to thank you all from the bottom of my heart for your truly wonderful support in the last
    days of my presence at Saint Michael’s School. It helped me go through those painful hours. I was
    struck by the grief that many of you expressed in one way or another. This made me more aware of
    the strong bond of charity that unites us in Our Lord Jesus Christ and that we have woven together
    over the last fifteen years. This bond remains untouched, it has perhaps even gained in strength while
    we were sharing in the pain of an abrupt separation. I keep you all in my prayers, especially during
    Holy Mass. Please, keep praying for me, too!

    May Our Blessed Lady keep you all in Her Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart which will always be our
    meeting point.

    Yours most gratefully,
    Sister Mary-Elizabeth

    1 http://www.portsmouthdiocese.org.uk/bishop/docs/20171109-BoP-Talk-I...
    2 http://www.portsmouthdiocese.org.uk/enews/mosque-visit.php Note that Bishop Egan wrote “I joined them
    [the Muslims in the mosque] for Friday prayers”.
    I'm no fan of the modernist and feminist tendencies in the sspx, but since when did we suffer women to teach? Fr John Brucciani was diplomatic in not revealing the scandal, but this sister out of no provocation kicks up a huge scandal and uses it as a platform to express her feelings, detract others, try to teach and make herself out to be a martyr. She is a modernist and feminist, not realising the best course when you have differences especially considering her state in life as a sister is to meekly and silently undergo persecution like our lady did.
    Don't let your hate for the sspx or novus ordo make you quick to praise this "brave" feminist speaking her mind when no one asked her to.
    If the resistance is attracting people like her to it then I can quickly see its chapels being dominated by disobedient feminist women.

    Offline X

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 613
    • Reputation: +609/-55
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sr. Mary Elisabeth Explains
    « Reply #9 on: April 06, 2019, 05:30:14 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Please consider helping them in this transition period that I imagine must be difficult.

    Donations can be sent via PayPal using this email address:


      srmelisabeth@outlook.com


    ..or directly to the following bank account:

      Account holder - C. Bastin
        Sort Code - 30-95-89
        Account number - 56210860

    Offline X

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 613
    • Reputation: +609/-55
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sr. Mary Elisabeth Explains
    « Reply #10 on: April 06, 2019, 06:01:51 AM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'm no fan of the modernist and feminist tendencies in the sspx, but since when did we suffer women to teach? Fr John Brucciani was diplomatic in not revealing the scandal, but this sister out of no provocation kicks up a huge scandal and uses it as a platform to express her feelings, detract others, try to teach and make herself out to be a martyr. She is a modernist and feminist, not realising the best course when you have differences especially considering her state in life as a sister is to meekly and silently undergo persecution like our lady did.
    Don't let your hate for the sspx or novus ordo make you quick to praise this "brave" feminist speaking her mind when no one asked her to.
    If the resistance is attracting people like her to it then I can quickly see its chapels being dominated by disobedient feminist women.

    Dear Chrysostom-

    You are right to be on your guard against the feminism currently running rampant in, and being promoted by, the SSPX, but wrong to impute it to Sr. Mary-Elizabeth:

    The Pauline injunctions against women teaching apply to women teaching men, not children.

    Were this not the case, the Church could not instruct mothers to teach their children, nor could it have authorized the once-great teaching orders such as the collapsed School Sisters of Nortre Dame, (nor would the SSPX have Sisters teaching children), etc.

    If, on the other hand, you are attempting to construe Sr. Mary-Elizabeth's letter as an example of the public instruction of men, and accusing her on this mistaken basis of being a feminist and modernist, perhaps you should have realized that what is published above in the OP was a private letter to some parents of her students who had asked for an explanation.

    It was one of these parents who, of their own volition, published the letter on the internet, and not as an agent of Sr. Mary-Elizabeth, or at her request.

    Pax tecuм,

    -X




    Offline clare

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2270
    • Reputation: +889/-38
    • Gender: Female
      • h
    Re: Sr. Mary Elisabeth Explains
    « Reply #11 on: April 06, 2019, 06:16:27 AM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'm no fan of the modernist and feminist tendencies in the sspx, but since when did we suffer women to teach? Fr John Brucciani was diplomatic in not revealing the scandal, but this sister out of no provocation kicks up a huge scandal and uses it as a platform to express her feelings, detract others, try to teach and make herself out to be a martyr. She is a modernist and feminist, not realising the best course when you have differences especially considering her state in life as a sister is to meekly and silently undergo persecution like our lady did.
    Don't let your hate for the sspx or novus ordo make you quick to praise this "brave" feminist speaking her mind when no one asked her to.
    If the resistance is attracting people like her to it then I can quickly see its chapels being dominated by disobedient feminist women.
    This is satire, right??

    Offline X

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 613
    • Reputation: +609/-55
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sr. Mary Elisabeth Explains
    « Reply #12 on: April 06, 2019, 06:43:17 AM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • Additional information:

    http://op54rosary.ning.com/forum/topics/prayer-for-parents-being-interviewed-by-fr-j-brucciani

    "Please could you pray for parents being interviewed by Fr John Brucciani. They have been warned that their place in the school and parish is jeapordised because they withdrew their children the morning of the conciliar Bishop's visit. The new school policy that parents must sign says that parents must respect the Pope and Diocesan Bishop.  Please pray that they do and say the thing that God wants."

    Offline X

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 613
    • Reputation: +609/-55
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sr. Mary Elisabeth Explains
    « Reply #13 on: April 06, 2019, 08:21:58 AM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • Interestingly, while Sr. Mary-Elizabeth was explaining to inquiring parents the reasons for her departure, foremost among which was her “conviction that the Society was no longer protecting the faithful from the modernist church” and teaching the children that the conciliar bishop was “a man of good will, that he was not bad,” and reiterating that “a modernist bishop is not a harmless preacher.  He carries about him all of the harmful spirit of Vatican II, destructive of the Catholic Faith,” and that “the children’s trust was captured for the benefit of a person unworthy of it,” and that she “would not be able to protect the children’s faith any more from this subtle poisoning of their faith,” Fr Brucciani was telling the world pretty much the opposite, in the pages of The Remnant’s “Letters to the Editor” (The Remnant Speaks):

    “This latest governmental challenge illustrates well the plight of Catholic families in the U.K. It is incredibly difficult to find a suitable school. It is only a matter of time before the ongoing government debate around home-schooling ends in new laws that further curtail parental rights. I write in the hope that Remnant Readers will pray for the only school left in England whose parents can entrust their children knowing that they will come to no harm. St. Michael’s School has now been in existence for thirty years and it is the only Traditional Catholic School in the land. As the battle intensifies, we are looking for spiritual support and financial help to keep up the good fight and to form tomorrow’s Catholic leaders. Who knows? The good Lord may inspire a reader to inquire further and reach out. Meanwhile, although thousands of miles away, please pray for us here in England, that we can continue to help preserve our children’s innocence.

    Fr. John Brucciani Headmaster, St. Michael’s School Burghclere, U.K.”

    The Remnant (3/31/19, p.3)

    Fr. Brucciani’s plea is doubly rich when one recalls the immoral school policy, twice posted and removed from the school website (only after public scandal ensued), endorsing much of the very same immorality he alludes to above!  

    Which of the two contenders above do you sense holding to a greater fidelity to the faith and tradition?

    In whose school would you feel more confident your children would "come to no harm:" One run by the SSPX and Fr. Brucciani, or one run by Sr. Mary-Elizabeth?

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31183
    • Reputation: +27098/-494
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sr. Mary Elisabeth Explains
    « Reply #14 on: April 06, 2019, 12:21:49 PM »
  • Thanks!5
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'm no fan of the modernist and feminist tendencies in the sspx, but since when did we suffer women to teach? Fr John Brucciani was diplomatic in not revealing the scandal, but this sister out of no provocation kicks up a huge scandal and uses it as a platform to express her feelings, detract others, try to teach and make herself out to be a martyr. She is a modernist and feminist, not realising the best course when you have differences especially considering her state in life as a sister is to meekly and silently undergo persecution like our lady did.
    Don't let your hate for the sspx or novus ordo make you quick to praise this "brave" feminist speaking her mind when no one asked her to.
    If the resistance is attracting people like her to it then I can quickly see its chapels being dominated by disobedient feminist women.

    You are a fool. Your rubbish doesn't even deserve a response.

    It is 100% Catholic and 100% traditional for nuns to teach children. That is in keeping with God's natural order. Adults (male and female) are in authority over, and ABOVE, all children -- both male and female. That is how God designed things. I'll give you a hint: the family. Both mother AND father have authority over all their children, both male and female.

    You sound like some kind of barely Catholic misogynist. You are letting  your hatred of women warp your thinking.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com