Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr. Pfeiffer's group in Boston, KY -- police warning  (Read 8960 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Fanny

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 571
  • Reputation: +248/-408
  • Gender: Female
Re: Fr. Pfeiffer's group in Boston, KY -- police warning
« Reply #60 on: October 01, 2017, 05:21:04 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • As long as Fr. Pfeiffer is clarifying things:  Has this priest yet clarified what it was, he alleges, that Fr. Voigt stole from him?  Has the priest clarified why it is that $20,000 borrowed from Fr. Voigt was never paid back to the latter?
    How about he clarify :
    1. how he can be SSPX- strict observance when he follows no rules.  
    2. His current relationship with b. Moran.


    Offline Nooseph Polten

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 154
    • Reputation: +68/-54
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Pfeiffer's group in Boston, KY -- police warning
    « Reply #61 on: October 01, 2017, 10:15:19 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • "They" didn't.  A layman borrowing the car did.  The same car fr Pfeiffer promised the donor that no one but the 2 priests would use it.
     Well why was the layman borrowing the car allowed to use it then? Call me crazy, but I wouldn't want to donate to someone who has been so irresponsible with multiple donations.
    +Truth and Justice for all+
                  JMJ


    Offline Tradplorable

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 616
    • Reputation: +114/-468
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Pfeiffer's group in Boston, KY -- police warning
    « Reply #62 on: October 01, 2017, 12:16:35 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • "They" didn't.  A layman borrowing the car did.  The same car fr Pfeiffer promised the donor that no one but the 2 priests would use it.
    What layman??

    Offline Fanny

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 571
    • Reputation: +248/-408
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Fr. Pfeiffer's group in Boston, KY -- police warning
    « Reply #63 on: October 02, 2017, 03:34:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • When a Traditional religious group went Indult some years ago, their leader commented how former friends had turned hostile. I wrote him that he shouldn't be surprised about the hostility because those former friends had given him money. He wrote back that they didn't give him the money, rather that they give it to God.
    It looks like God's pockets are found all over Traddieland!
    Common sense, but...
    "..do not spend money uselessly, remembering the sacrifices undertaken by parents or benefactors ..."  -- a.b. Lefebvre "rule of seminaries" 1972
    Qq

    Offline Fanny

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 571
    • Reputation: +248/-408
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Fr. Pfeiffer's group in Boston, KY -- police warning
    « Reply #64 on: October 02, 2017, 03:39:35 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This is too funny! The one in the foreground is 20 years old and his initials are SK. The one in the background I have seen but don't know his name. These "seminarians" are not even tontured. SK's brother was also a seminarian but rumor has it that he was sent to the Philippines to start a mission (being only 17 or 18 years old) and failed, so was either sent back to his parents or his parents pulled him out.  These young men are probably out collecting money because their primary benefactor has died and the family can not and will not give another dime to that cultish group.
    "Rumor"
    "Probably"
    Sin of detraction and probably scandal.  
    I encourage you to cease and desist.


    Offline Fanny

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 571
    • Reputation: +248/-408
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Fr. Pfeiffer's group in Boston, KY -- police warning
    « Reply #65 on: October 02, 2017, 03:50:42 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Fr. Pfeiffer clarifies why it is illicit under all circuмstances for Fr. Abraham to be in the public ministry in England.

    .
    He clarifies why Bp. Faure is wrong to support Bp. Williamson in the matter of Fr. Abraham.

    He clarifies why he believes any "miracles" in the Novus Ordo are false and intended to deceive the elect.

    .
    He says they have invited and communicated with Bp. Williamson and Bp. Faure to come visit and that they are welcome to come, but they have received no response. He says they claim he has cut himself off, but that is not true.
    .
    He says that Bp. Zendejas speaks and teaches in a confused and ambiguous and unclear manner. That he has many errors. He particularly identifies Bp. Zendejas's statement that "honest men wanted changes at the Vatican II Council" is a complete error.
    This is what fr. Pfeiffer forgets, among other things:
    "What God has approved remains approved; and, if we are faithful to the observance of these statutes, our priestly and religious life and our apostolate will be blessed by God.   They will bear fruits of wondrous holiness..."
    -- a.b. Lefebvre "statutes of the sspx", 1976

    Offline JPaul

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3832
    • Reputation: +3722/-293
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Pfeiffer's group in Boston, KY -- police warning
    « Reply #66 on: October 02, 2017, 06:40:06 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • What is the truth is that it was not honest men who agitated for and used this false council to destroy our Religion, so what honest men wanted is not germane to the discussion. That isn't a serious error just an over optimistic and inaccurate view of thing. 

    Astute and honest men were in deadly fear that what did happen would happen if the others were successful in getting their council at that time.

    Offline DZ PLEASE

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2928
    • Reputation: +741/-787
    • Gender: Male
    • "Lord, have mercy."
    Re: Fr. Pfeiffer's group in Boston, KY -- police warning
    « Reply #67 on: October 04, 2017, 04:48:09 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • "What God has approved remains approved;... "
    I'm not sure that's true, at least not as given here. 
    "Lord, have mercy".