It's really a summary of why the Resistance must exist and be supported.
In the SSPX chapels, various evils are called "good", while countless goods are called "evil".
I hold that it doesn't get any more fundamentally screwed up than calling good "evil" and evil "good". Once a person/chapel/organization/nation embraces that behavior, ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE eventually, even blasphemy, child sacrifice (abortion?) and devil worship. All sins are fundamentally lies, or exaggerating minor goods and downplaying/ignoring great evils -- such as offending God. Calling self or concupiscence "good" and God "something bad".
Examples of this in the SSPX are too numerous to mention.
My premise: a valid Mass is heavily tainted when it comes with this fundamental poison as an add-on. What good is having access to confession, if you are trained to call evil "good" and good "evil"? Once a person has thus violated Truth, one's confessions will eventually become invalid anyhow -- a valid priest is only part of the equation for making a good (or valid) confession. The same with Holy Communion -- what good is receiving Our Lord every Sunday if one has no love for goodness or the Truth? Eventually such a person will fall into mortal sin anyway, and then such weekly Communions will become sacrilegious -- tickets to Hell instead of Heaven.
Traditional Catholic parents concerned about their sons, or the friends of their sons, engaging in consensual sodomy at Immaculate Conception Academy in Post Falls, ID are called "evil" and vilified.
https://www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/sodomy-scandal-in-post-falls-id-sspx-immaculate-conception-academy/Priests holding fast to Tradition, to what they were taught in the Seminary, to the wisdom of Archbishop Lefebvre, are called "evil", while those who have grown closer to the world and Vatican II are called "good".
Bishop Williamson who is the most faithful successor of Abp. Lefebvre (some Trads, especially some sedevacantists, might criticize him -- but we're talking about SSPX-attending Catholics here. They claim to revere Abp. Lefebvre!) is called evil.
Bishop Fellay, who secretly attempted to transform the SSPX into "FSSP part 2" and embraced Freemasonic tactics all-around, is called "good".
Brave priests full of Fortitude, faithful to what they were taught, and truth-tellers are called evil, while cowardly priests who "keep their head down" are called good.
Public consecration of bishops for the assured continuation of Tradition, without attempting to confer jurisdiction -- in short, exactly the same situation as +ABL's consecrations in 1988 -- is called "evil" just because those bishops support the Resistance. I'm speaking of the consecration of Bishops Faure, Thomas Aquinas, and Zendejas.
Modernist, Conciliar bishops are called "good" and get red carpet treatment, while Bishops Williamson and Zendejas (in particular) are called "evil" and are actively persecuted by SSPX clergy -- even when such persecution causes actual damage to Traditional Catholic souls. Preventing the opening of a retreat center, for example. The SSPX's hatred for these good prelates is so consuming, that they don't even care about the welfare of Traditional Catholic souls anymore. Their PRIMARY and MAIN concern is the bottom line of SSPX, Inc. -- its power and wealth.
Based on their actions, which can't be denied, I can conclude that the superiors in the SSPX would rather have $200 million in yearly income and 4000 souls enter heaven, than $199 million in yearly income and 4200 souls enter heaven. They aren't content with souls being saved outside SSPX, Inc. They would rather have 1 more parishioner than allow "someone else" to save the souls of 10 or 15 parishioners. They are completely selfish. That is not a Christ-like attitude.
For example: it is EVIL to try to αssαssιnαtҽ a priest. It's MORE EVIL to go ahead and attempt assassination of a priest, even if 100 innocent traditional Catholics will certainly die in the attempt.
WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?