Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3

Author Topic: Sounding the Alarm  (Read 1931 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SeanJohnson

Sounding the Alarm
« on: April 20, 2023, 06:49:13 AM »
Your Excellencies, Rev. Fathers-

I do not know how closely your duties permit you to track recent events within the SSPX, but things have now progressed to a critical state:

You may be aware of rumors that the SSPX is to receive new bishops approved by Rome (perhaps even consecrated by conciliar prelates)?

And perhaps you are also aware that Bishop (?) Huonder recently consecrated (?) Holy oils for the SSPX at Zaitzkofen.

It seems to me that these two items are not disconnected, and the latter may suggest the former is no mere rumor: 

If the faithful (and clergy) will tolerate holy oils consecrated (?) by a conciliar bishop, perhaps they’ll also tolerate conciliar bishops consecrating more bishops for the SSPX.

Hardly any of the faithful are complaining, and this is surely being communicated to Rome, that they believe it is safe to proceed to consecrating bishops.

But now, unbelievably, something has happened which causes me to conclude in the near certainty of it:

The SSPX has just released a movie trailer promoting Bishop (?) Huonder:

[color=var(--interaction-norm)]https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=s-UWYRoHggU&embeds_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cathinfo.com%2F&source_ve_path=MjM4NTE&feature=emb_title[/url][/font][/size][/color]

There is little doubt in my mind that they are preparing the terrain for the acceptance of new bishops (approved by Rome, and consecrated in what rite, and by whom?).

A final question: Since when does Rome approve bishops for communities not in communion with Rome? If modernist Rome is consecrating/approving bishops for the SSPX, then perhaps we need to revisit the Argentinian recognition of the SSPX in that country (ie., Has Rome already approved the SSPX years ago?). 

These developments have caused me to wonder if we were wrong to think Rome was gradually, incrementally walking the SSPX toward regularization. Perhaps Rome is instead gradually REVEALING a regularization which occurred back in 2015 in Argentina (2015 being the same year in which the SSPX received jurisdiction for confessions, and which according to Huonder, Francis appointed him to make contact with the Society to help reintegrate them into the conciliar church)?

Semper Idem,
Sean Johnson

Logged

Offline SeanJohnson

Re: Sounding the Alarm
« Reply #1 on: April 20, 2023, 07:00:18 AM »
More evidence to support the possibility that the SSPX was alread approved “ad tempus” (ie., on a probationary basis) in 2015:

-In 2018, the SSPX announces that it has sent the results of its General Chapter to Rome for ratification.

-Ecclesia Dei priests begin serving at SSPX chapels in Africa.
Logged

Offline AMDGJMJ

Re: Sounding the Alarm
« Reply #2 on: April 20, 2023, 07:03:14 AM »
Did you send this out to a bunch of people via email or just post here?

It would be interesting to see how the different clergy would respond.  :popcorn:
Logged

Offline SeanJohnson

Re: Sounding the Alarm
« Reply #3 on: April 20, 2023, 07:08:30 AM »
Quote from: AMDGJMJ on April 20, 2023, 07:03:14 AM
Did you send this out to a bunch of people via email or just post here?

It would be interesting to see how the different clergy would respond.  :popcorn:

Both.

My reason for posting it here is to open the possibility to broader scrutiny, to see whether my hypothesis is sustainable or not.
Logged

Offline 2Vermont

Re: Sounding the Alarm
« Reply #4 on: April 20, 2023, 07:18:11 AM »
Quote from: SeanJohnson on April 20, 2023, 06:49:13 AM

A final question: Since when does Rome approve bishops for communities not in communion with Rome?

Remember that this is post-Vatican II Rome.  Nothing is impossible with "Rome".
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3
« previous next »