Author Topic: Someone starting rumors, starting trouble about Fr. Zendejas (Read 44757 times)

Frances · « **Reply #10 on:** October 31, 2014, 05:50:22 PM »

:dancing-banana:
Maybe it's because Fr. Zendejas is a REAL Mexican with true Cristeros blood in his veins, and someone else is not.

Sienna629 · « **Reply #11 on:** October 31, 2014, 07:01:58 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

There will be no unfounded rumors about Fr. Zendejas posted here on CathInfo.

If you get some kind of proof, then we'll talk.

I don't believe Fr. Zendejas is a mole or operative for Fr. Wegner (who is the new District Superior of the US District)

Agreed, we certainly shouldn't jump to such a conclusion without proof. To do so is not Christian charity. Let's give him a chance!

I know many of us would be thrilled to have a true priest make such a time commitment.

Perhaps he doesn't do well flying. Some people have a real fear/aversion to it, to the point that it literally makes them physically ill.

Thurifer7 · « **Reply #12 on:** October 31, 2014, 09:46:45 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

Quote from: Ekim

On another note, one member of this forum posted that Father asked that he not be recorded. I would question why they didn't honor his request.

SPEAKING of that video,

A few days ago someone pointed out to me a video on Pablo's youtube channel which contained 45 seconds of Fr. Zendejas at one of the East Coast chapels in question. It was the tail end of a sermon -- he didn't say anything interesting in particular.

But the description of the video had something EXACTLY along the lines of the message sent out by InThisSign. That is to say, extremely upset, "emergency", "Fr. Zendejas trying to steal souls away", etc.

On Pablo's youtube channel.

So, again, you'll have to forgive me for thinking Pablo was behind the message I received today. It's essentially the same message! It even has the same tone.

I was very confused when I got it, and in fact I was rather upset at the time about such an accusation against Fr. Zendejas.

What he said was that God wants those who have been "effiminated" to be removed from the Society.

Francisco · « **Reply #13 on:** November 01, 2014, 02:53:30 AM »

Quote from: Ekim

In the previous thread Stella said that she was at Fr's Mass. According to her report, he said that he was not expelled from the SSPX but requested to be dismissed and then left. So there ya have it. Now people want to label him a "Mole"? Shame on them!

I find this entire thing bothersome. Any group of Traditional Catholics should be grateful to have such a priest at their disposal. This should be of #1 importance. Instead, someone is trying to turn this into a turf war...really?...REALLY??

How are other priests who may be on the fence about leaving the SSPX going to think about all this? Will they be unappreciated? Called a “Mole”? Not “Resistance” enough? CRAZY! CRAZY! CRAZY! This needs to be nipped in the bud!

I would think Fr. Pfeiffer would be ecstatic that these souls now have access to the fullness of the Catholic Faith on a regular basis, something he could not provide.

Mass Schedule Update
http://www.inthissignyoushallconquer.com/

Mass in Sparta, NJ, Father Pfeiffer
Saturday, Nov 1 at 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Mass in Danbury, CT, Fr. Pfeiffer
Saturday, Nov 1 at 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM
Mass in Danbury, CT, Fr. Pfeiffer
Sunday, Nov 2 at 8:03 AM - 9:30 AM

Ekim · « **Reply #14 on:** November 01, 2014, 04:21:58 AM »

This Resistance thing is starting to get a little unhinged, from turf wars to +Williamson apparition cliffhanger's, it seems like it's all starting to get unraveled. I'm feeling that after Fr. Pfeiffer's sermons inthe North East, it's going to get worse.