Covering up and protecting criminals is typical novus ordo tactics which is not Catholic.
As Catholics, we love the Catholic Church, including the SSPX.
It isn't Catholic when there are lack of morals being condoned and it goes against the Word of God.  Sodomy, greed, pederasty is leading souls to Hell. Hence, it is not Catholic.

Archbishop Fulton Sheen says it is up to the laity to save the Catholic Church.
It is up to laity to make sure that priests act like priests and bishops act like bishops.

The laity is to blame for their silence and worshipping man instead of God.

Innocent children are being destroyed by evil. There should be outrage sodomy and perversion is being considered the norm at a traditional Catholic school.  That's pure evil.  Those who ignored a child who was brutally whipped and sɛҳuąƖly abused has no business being a priest.

A real Catholic superior would fire,defrock and excommunicate immediately instead of playing the novus ordo game of protecting, tranferring bad priests where they end raping more children.  Children's safety should be a priority.  

The Year of Mercy was to open the doors to sodomists.
A real Pope would defrock and excommunicate sodomists instead promoting them. This not Catholic.  

During the SSPX negotiations with Rome,  there should been more talks about the indifference towards sins of the flesh and the real schismatics and heretics within the Catholic Church. Thanks to Pope Francis and Timothy Dolan, most Catholics are losing the faith by supporting sodomy, divorce, abortion, money and fame. Then there satanists who have infiltrated the Church and believe in their evil twisted possessed minds that raping children is love.  

JPM:

Not a single shred of evidence has been provided to substantiate the rumor the thread was based upon.  The only addition was from some supposed locals who were aware of the rumblings and rumors but offered nothing more nor less than the original emails that began the thread.

Well, as long as people remain quiet, as long as sspx district superior Wegener, and those above him, can keep the whole affair under wraps, JPM and his cronies hold the upper hand.  No doubt, we need some evidence in hand.  

Indisputably, there is a letter of resignation from Fr. Vassal.  But we haven't seen it. Sloniker is certainly no chimera.  He is not a figment of someone's vivid imagination.  His story was splashed all over the newspapers.  So was Populus.'

JPM may well may be a trial lawyer representing the Society.  Do we know, and will he reveal his true identity?  I doubt it.  But he's right.  Unless parents step forward openly and publicly with written and spoken testimony, the case will never exceed "gross negligence,"  to loosely insert a phrase from the present epoch.   Parents and students themselves need to provide some real evidence.  Otherwise, they'll never be able to prove "criminal intent."  It is all becoming somewhat 'Hillaryesque.'  

Fr. Gardner:

The Society of St. Pius X, its priests, and its employees take the protection of minors most seriously.

Do they really!!?  Boy, you could sure fool some of us!  Thanks, Mark, for reprinting that letter on an sspx online letterhead.  We need more of this.  Because what I see developing is a cover-up extraordinaire.

I think his point in bringing it up is that serious matters are swept under the carpet or put in the back of a closet rather than be addressed.

The SSPX has all of the US Catholic Church cases right in front of them to see the damage that the devil is doing:
some of us cannot place facts as clearly on this site without letting everyone know who we are or why we have the information.

Background checks are not done by SSPX on counselors or teachers at the Academies.  This is  a fact.  There is not a letter than can be published to this.

The business side of the SSPX needs to be taken under strict control to protect us all.

the SSPX has in fact been implementing programs that will not only protect the children from being alone with anyone but also themselves from false accusations. They started in Canadian parishes first as a trial.  

What exactly are these "programs" to protect the children?

There is nothing that can protect the children if the SSPX hires predators and ordains effeminates, the protection begins with the prior responsible for the hiring and the rectors in charge of the seminaries.  

You would think so but the SSPX has in fact been implementing programs that will not only protect the children from being alone with anyone but also themselves from false accusations. They started in Canadian parishes first as a trial.  But people complained and left over that too. Some think it's a sign of the SSPX modernizing and refuse to conform. No matter what they do, someone is not happy.

This was not done across Canada, only in Saskatchewan or Manitoba.
The reason people left was because what they were being forced to sign (yes their children couldn't receive 1st Communion etc unless the parents signed) stated that this was their committment in perpetuity that they WOULD NEVER SUE THE SSPX.

It was withdrawn so the wording could be reworked.

Would you sign?