Author Topic: Sodomy Scandal in Post Falls, ID - SSPX Immaculate Conception Academy (Read 201092 times)

hollingsworth · « **Reply #330 on:** August 25, 2016, 10:34:58 AM »

Mary Jane:

Quote

And to clarify what I said about trips and play rehearsals, I should have been more precise. I meant to ask only whether any illicit actions had occurred by students involved in that teacher's projects, not that he was directly or personally involved.

I am not aware of any "trips" this teacher took with his cast. However, we observed him many time rehearsing with his students downstairs in the basement. It was all done very much in the open.

If "illicit actions" occurred in any of that "teacher's projects," they would have to have been carried out under his auspices, at least indirectly, while he was somewhere in the vicinity. or, somehow, nearby. Is that not what you're saying or implying? Are you not accusing him of creating a situation or contributing to an environment in which these acts might be more easily and conveniently performed?

I think you are trying to implicate this teacher in some way. Am I wrong?

Incredulous · « **Reply #331 on:** August 25, 2016, 06:31:06 PM »

It appears the letter from the affected parents never came?

But why? Was the matter settled by and undisclosed pay-out settlement from the xSPX?

How else could Father Wegner have the termerity to say the scandal was closed?

hollingsworth · « **Reply #332 on:** August 26, 2016, 10:46:28 AM »

Incredulous:

Quote

3. The following year, Father Rostand confronted a Catholic in the coffee room at the Carson City Mission chapel and accused them of violating the law by having read the 238 sermons. He even pulled out his smartphone to record the his conversation with the man.

4. In Indiana a few years ago, the same Father Rostand bullied an independent chapel, just south of Indianapolis, blustering that if the faithful didn't sign over the property to the xSPX, "... they open another chapel down the street and put them out of business."

This testimony tracks with my own experience. Rostand tried to bully me and make me look silly in a parish meeting at ICC. Needless to say, it didn't work.

BTW, since Mary Jane has been talking about possible litigation against some, would it be actionable to accuse a priest on a public forum of being a total jackass?
Because, I think Rostand is a total jackass and a disgrace to his calling.

What about it, Mary Jane? Could your lawyer relative, perhaps, find cause to bring legal action against me for saying such a thing online.

Meanwhile, Fr. Rostand, may I suggest that you find another line of work?

Incredulous · « **Reply #333 on:** August 26, 2016, 10:58:59 AM »

Sounds like we better all "Lawyer-up" :thinking:

The realization is sinking-in that Wegner did an out-of-court settlement and the parents are now silenced.

I'm incredulous at a neo-trad religious order's adeptness to make their way through the world like Freemasons.

hollingsworth · « **Reply #334 on:** August 26, 2016, 11:23:23 AM »

Incredulous:

Quote

The realization is sinking-in that Wegner did an out-of-court settlement and the parents are now silenced.

This might be the case, But then, what was the exact nature of that "settlement" in your opinion, Incred? I mean, what could the D.S. have said to them in order to shut them up? What kind of an arrangement could he have made with them to ensure future silence? What kind of threats might he have made in order to cow these parents into silence? I don't get it.

They should be screaming from the roof tops. Instead, ICC parishioners are apparently back to their heads-down, robotic, Mass-attending past. They have, it would seem, settled back into that comfortable, head-in-the-sand Catholicism of the 50s to which the bishop makes occasional reference.