Lol. And if everything written in every book must necessarily be true, then Salza and Siscoe wrote a book proving the last 6 Popes are true Popes, and I guess that must necessarily be true as well. As I said, the confusion among some in the Resistance like Sean (btw, someone posted on another thread that Sean Johnson self-identifies as a "practical sedevacantist" now, which shows some of his critiques are essentially from the sedevacantist perspective) come from failing to understand the Society has become fully convinced, through argument, reason and doctrine, that the Indult position is the way to go.
Well, Salza and Siscoe also believe that the SSPX is schismatic, right?
What are your views on Bp. Fellay's seer from the 1990's, Madame Rossiniere, who received information though supposed locutions that the SSPX would save the Church, if the SSPX adopted Madame Rossiniere's "Christ-Priest" brand of Catholicism. Bp. Fellay wanted very much for the SSPX to adopt Madame Rossiniere's methodology, but the other SSPX bishops did not, thank goodness.
Do you agree with Madame Rossiniere and Bp. Fellay that the SSPX will save the Church? Because Archbishop Lefebvre never said that.
Mme. Rossiniere (Cornaz) "Prophesizes" to Msgr. Fellay (1990's) - page 1 - SSPX Resistance News - Catholic Info (cathinfo.com)
Topic: Should the Society and the Resistance reconcile? (Read 5063 times)