Author Topic: Sharon Jane Ballatine (Read 50159 times)

Novus Weirdo · « **Reply #120 on:** September 10, 2013, 09:37:05 PM »

Quote from: tradical

This is interesting - I simply stated what I was aware of.

Then you were either misled or blind or silently approving. Your defense of She-Devil-Harpy on I(diocy)A(ll the Time) defines your support of her actions. Simply stated, you knew.

Quote from: tradical

Regarding the 'company you keep' - that could be said equally about the denizens of this forum.

Tell us all again, why are you here?

Quote from: tradical

As far as dance off in the sunset - why?

Because "off in the sunset" means the same as "into the sunset," which means a conclusion or an end. Since you're too dense to get the hint, it means we want you gone or nonexistent on this forum.

Zeitun · « **Reply #121 on:** September 10, 2013, 09:52:01 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

I received another e-mail from Patricia McKeever in which it was vehemently denied that "CrofterLady" was Sharon Jane Ballatine.

She also ranted on against the Resistance, the SSPX, CathInfo... I skimmed a few words of it and promptly ignored it.

Ballantyne Family History
http://thegilmours.wordpress.com/history-of-our-family-names/ballantyne/

Quote

Ballantyne Says:

October 18, 2011 at 10:17 pm
the name Ballantyne has a gaelic root BAILE AN DEADHAIN meaning THE FARM IN THE VALLEY. There are many places in Scotland which bear the name Bellandean or something of a similar spelling, and they are all farmsteads of some kind . As a Border Ballantyne, I would like to point out that BORDERERS ARE NOT CL:ANSMEN. This is something found in the Highlands. It is a common mistake made by those of Scots descent that we must be of a clan, but we are not. There are so many versions of where Ballantynes come from and who are the chiefs etc and it’s mostly made up because no one knows. However, given the translation it is possible that this is a name given to peasant farmers, or crofters, the.sept is usually some poor distant relation and in this instance you give, they were probably the crofters. Gaelic incidentally was not a language confined to the Highlands but spoken widely – mainly welsh celtic in the Borders pre1000 AD. There was also movement through the Black Douglas and the Bruce of men and families between the Borders and the West Coast – inner Hebrides during the 13/14th centuries through thier struggle against the Stuarts, so not Campbell men and not Stuart men either. – I know my roots are from Bellendean between Hawick and Selkirk – in 450 years we only moved about 20 miles away as the crowflies so not a huge migration. According to my late great aunt born in 1906, her grandfather used to say that ‘we were Watty’s men before he was a Duke…..’ clearly we were Reivers not highland clansmen. We wear the Hunting Scot because we were Watty Scott of Buccleuch’s men. I think you will find that there is an enormous difference between highland history and Border History. May I recommend a book called the Steel Bonnets for those whose roots are in the Borders. Borderers were attacked on both sides – by the highland clansmen from the north and the English from the South. Major Bellenden is a poem by Scot – have a look for it if you have the time – it celebrates a Border Ballantyne..Frankly I might as well be called English if I’m going to be referred to as a clansman!!!

You will also note a "Sharon" posts on that page but it's probably a coincidence.

Novus Weirdo · « **Reply #122 on:** September 11, 2013, 11:33:34 PM »

Quote from: Zeitun

Quote from: Matthew
I received another e-mail from Patricia McKeever in which it was vehemently denied that "CrofterLady" was Sharon Jane Ballatine.

She also ranted on against the Resistance, the SSPX, CathInfo... I skimmed a few words of it and promptly ignored it.

Ballantyne Family History
http://thegilmours.wordpress.com/history-of-our-family-names/ballantyne/

Quote
Ballantyne Says:

October 18, 2011 at 10:17 pm
the name Ballantyne has a gaelic root BAILE AN DEADHAIN meaning THE FARM IN THE VALLEY. There are many places in Scotland which bear the name Bellandean or something of a similar spelling, and they are all farmsteads of some kind . As a Border Ballantyne, I would like to point out that BORDERERS ARE NOT CL:ANSMEN. This is something found in the Highlands. It is a common mistake made by those of Scots descent that we must be of a clan, but we are not. There are so many versions of where Ballantynes come from and who are the chiefs etc and it’s mostly made up because no one knows. However, given the translation it is possible that this is a name given to peasant farmers, or crofters, the.sept is usually some poor distant relation and in this instance you give, they were probably the crofters. Gaelic incidentally was not a language confined to the Highlands but spoken widely – mainly welsh celtic in the Borders pre1000 AD. There was also movement through the Black Douglas and the Bruce of men and families between the Borders and the West Coast – inner Hebrides during the 13/14th centuries through thier struggle against the Stuarts, so not Campbell men and not Stuart men either. – I know my roots are from Bellendean between Hawick and Selkirk – in 450 years we only moved about 20 miles away as the crowflies so not a huge migration. According to my late great aunt born in 1906, her grandfather used to say that ‘we were Watty’s men before he was a Duke…..’ clearly we were Reivers not highland clansmen. We wear the Hunting Scot because we were Watty Scott of Buccleuch’s men. I think you will find that there is an enormous difference between highland history and Border History. May I recommend a book called the Steel Bonnets for those whose roots are in the Borders. Borderers were attacked on both sides – by the highland clansmen from the north and the English from the South. Major Bellenden is a poem by Scot – have a look for it if you have the time – it celebrates a Border Ballantyne..Frankly I might as well be called English if I’m going to be referred to as a clansman!!!

You will also note a "Sharon" posts on that page but it's probably a coincidence.

It's probably a coincidence. And it's probably another coincidence that this same person, proud of her Scottish heritage, posted on the Catholic Truth Scotland blog. I wonder if it's the same person as ’spiritustempore’? Nah....

Wessex · « **Reply #123 on:** September 12, 2013, 05:36:29 AM »

To be honest, the politcs of tradition in England and Scotland is rather small beer. One may conclude that tradition no longer exists in the UK, so fearful Catholics are of being considered 'extremist', 'schismatic', 'anti-semitic' or at odds with life in the mainstream. It could be they have a acquired a 'minority mentality' over the years and are so keen to fit in and easily turn on those who demur.

The site called Catholic Truth Scotland tries to corral the few trads into being loyal subjects of the hierarchy. It is not alone here; much of the Latin Mass crowd have been so herded and are content with what they have. The 'minority mentality' at work! Anyone upsetting this ring-fencing, like Bp. W, hardline trads, Fr. Kramer, etc., has to be suppressed!

hollingsworth · « **Reply #124 on:** September 12, 2013, 11:15:10 AM »

Matthew:

Quote

I received another e-mail from Patricia McKeever in which it was vehemently denied that "CrofterLady" was Sharon Jane Ballatine.

Who cares a damn, Matthew? BTW, just a word to the wise: If you want this forum not to turn completely to crud, keep the likes of Tradical off of it. :pop:

parentsfortruth · « **Reply #125 on:** September 12, 2013, 02:46:50 PM »

So glad Wessex, Hollingsworth and Skunkwerksspx are back to contributing. Those are the people, personally, I like hearing from, versus some of the rejects from IA. (I mean reject, as in people that can't post there anymore due to the site being down, by the way.)

hollingsworth · « **Reply #126 on:** September 12, 2013, 03:35:19 PM »

Parentsfor:

Quote

So glad Wessex, Hollingsworth and Skunkwerksspx are back to contributing. Those are the people, personally, I like hearing from, versus some of the rejects from IA. (I mean reject, as in people that can't post there anymore due to the site being down, by the way.)

Thank you for the compliment. But I think that a number of Cathinfo forum members may be holding their noses.

Incredulous · « **Reply #127 on:** September 12, 2013, 04:16:02 PM »

Matthew will surely welcome the veteran Resistance from IA.
However, he's tasked to tighten up his forum's "Ellis island" checkpoint.

Patricius opened the floodgates to the Accordistas and they sank IA.
.

I addition, CI Resistance veterans are immigrating to other forums.

Zeitun · « **Reply #128 on:** September 12, 2013, 06:01:43 PM »

Quote from: Incredulous

Matthew will surely welcome the veteran Resistance from IA.
However, he's tasked to tighten up his forum's "Ellis island" checkpoint.

Patricius opened the floodgates to the Accordistas and they sank IA.
.

I addition, CI Resistance veterans are immigrating to other forums.

That's a good likeness of Matthew. :drillsergeant:

Wessex · « **Reply #129 on:** September 13, 2013, 05:08:11 AM »

I wonder if people here can recognise their ancestors from Naples and Limerick. What happened to the women?

stgobnait · « **Reply #130 on:** September 13, 2013, 07:27:40 AM »

wer'nt they segregated, at ellis island?

tradical · « **Reply #131 on:** September 13, 2013, 08:28:32 AM »

Quote from: Incredulous

Patricius opened the floodgates to the Accordistas and they sank IA.

This is hardly the case. The one post that 'sank' IA (in reality Patricius or the software drained the water from the bath tub by pulling the plug) was by a virulent resistor.

Furthermore, the questions about k-gate etc are linked to the 'resistors' and their arguments.

So, if anyone is responsible for the problems encountered by Ignis Ardens, it is the resistors.

God Bless!!!

ultrarigorist · « **Reply #132 on:** September 13, 2013, 10:31:36 AM »

Quote from: tradical

Quote from: Incredulous

Patricius opened the floodgates to the Accordistas and they sank IA.

This is hardly the case. The one post that 'sank' IA (in reality Patricius or the software drained the water from the bath tub by pulling the plug) was by a virulent resistor.

Furthermore, the questions about k-gate etc are linked to the 'resistors' and their arguments.

So, if anyone is responsible for the problems encountered by Ignis Ardens, it is the resistors.

God Bless!!!

Has anyone made you aware that bearing False Witness is sinful?

1st Mansion Tenant · « **Reply #133 on:** September 13, 2013, 11:21:08 AM »

Do you really think that software that blocked me from posting the name of English author Charles Dickens on IA wouldn't block out the profanities in question without collapsing the the site? I also remember people posting the phrase "stop *itching", and "don't be *itchy" and a few forms of the ever popular a**. And those are just the ones I know of. I think you seem desperate somehow to establish this still unproven software meltdown. Why is it evidently so important to you that that be the case?

Quote from: tradical

Quote from: Incredulous

Patricius opened the floodgates to the Accordistas and they sank IA.

This is hardly the case. The one post that 'sank' IA (in reality Patricius or the software drained the water from the bath tub by pulling the plug) was by a virulent resistor.

Furthermore, the questions about k-gate etc are linked to the 'resistors' and their arguments.

So, if anyone is responsible for the problems encountered by Ignis Ardens, it is the resistors.

God Bless!!!

tradical · « **Reply #134 on:** September 13, 2013, 12:16:25 PM »

Quote from: 1st Mansion Tenant

Do you really think that software that blocked me from posting the name of English author Charles ####ens on IA wouldn't block out the profanities in question without collapsing the the site? I also remember people posting the phrase "stop *itching", and "don't be *itchy" and a few forms of the ever popular a**. And those are just the ones I know of. I think you seem desperate somehow to establish this still unproven software meltdown. Why is it evidently so important to you that that be the case?

Quote from: tradical
Quote from: Incredulous

Patricius opened the floodgates to the Accordistas and they sank IA.

This is hardly the case. The one post that 'sank' IA (in reality Patricius or the software drained the water from the bath tub by pulling the plug) was by a virulent resistor.

Furthermore, the questions about k-gate etc are linked to the 'resistors' and their arguments.

So, if anyone is responsible for the problems encountered by Ignis Ardens, it is the resistors.

God Bless!!!

Nothing of the sort - as I noted earlier I made my posting (and there was nothing in it to trigger such a reaction automatically) and then a short while later <boom> the site was offline.

My assumptions were that:

1. The original poster lost it completely and was explicit.
2. Patricius, being in Ireland was asleep.
3. The forum software reached some limit and took the site offline.

It is quite possible that assumption #2 was faulty and Patricius has been watching the site and had just had enough.

Patricius had been notably absent for months from the forum, leading me to speculate the resulting offline condition as a result of a bot intervention.

If I'm wrong, it doesn't really matter. If it wasn't an automatic software event, then perhaps Patricius was up early one morning and decided to check the forum - found the argument and in disgust pulled the plug.

Either option is viable, and I don't have the time to delve into the settings of the IA forum to investigate further in order to rule out a programmed response.

God bless!!!