Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 16

Author Topic: Sharon Jane Ballatine  (Read 50188 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline tradical

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 53
  • Reputation: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
Sharon Jane Ballatine
« Reply #105 on: September 09, 2013, 10:21:43 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: 1st Mansion Tenant
    Tradical, if you are so sure that DNF is not Sharon Ballentine, which one did you come here to support and why? Surely you don't support DNF's unCatholic behavior despite the revelation? Even if they were different people, or one and the same, they are still vile.


    I came here (originally) to explain what had happened on the 'Sharon Ballentine' thread - the provided some explanation as to why the site went down.

    With respect to DNF - The accusations against her stalking etc was never demonstrated by the posting of the PM's etc.

    DNF stated on another thread that she was not Sharon B etc.  Given her posting history (from what I remember) and the lack of any real evidence - I see no reason to believe that she is this Sharon person.

    What Sharon B was/is - is another matter entirely.

    God Bless!
    Logged

    Offline tradical

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 53
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Sharon Jane Ballatine
    « Reply #106 on: September 09, 2013, 10:24:21 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote
    Not to worry, that was the reason why I stayed at Ignis Ardens.  I made one post asking a question and zing 'Accordista Alert'.


    ...

    Novus Weirdo,

    Did you really not understand the grammar involved or are you just giving me some 'low hanging fruit'?

    God Bless!

    Logged

    Offline tradical

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 53
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Sharon Jane Ballatine
    « Reply #107 on: September 09, 2013, 10:32:45 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Nickolas
    You see Tradical, one of the differences between IA and this forum, we could not ignore your posts on IA.  On Cathinfo, we can hide your sarcastic "bless you's" and indeed your entire posts by the press of the HIDE button, letting you to talk to yourself until you fall off the vine.  I hope all will ignore your wasted words from here on out.  



    If a thread that I post is 'ignored' by those who are uncomfortable with what I write, that is their prerogative.  

    The other denizens of Cathinfo will be able to decide for themselves.

    Given the nature of online forums, I anticipate significant exchanges because what I post will definitely challenge some of the key assumptions held dearly by other posters on this site (as occurred on Ignis Ardens).

    If this gets me banned (as some would like) then so be it.

    God Bless!!!
    Logged

    Offline Zeitun

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1601
    • Reputation: +974/-14
    • Gender: Female
    Sharon Jane Ballatine
    « Reply #108 on: September 09, 2013, 10:34:05 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: tradical
    With respect to DNF - The accusations against her stalking etc was never demonstrated by the posting of the PM's etc.


    That's because the people she was stalking knew that posting PMs is against forum policy and would cause them to be banned.  DNF also knew that and so she was "safe".  Several people complained to Pat and sent copies of the harassing PMs but he never took action. I know of one person who contacted a lawyer but since Pat didn't answer emails it kinda fizzled out.  

    It's patently untrue to suggest that the victims didn't try to resolve the problems.
    Logged

    Offline 1st Mansion Tenant

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1765
    • Reputation: +1446/-127
    • Gender: Female
    Sharon Jane Ballatine
    « Reply #109 on: September 09, 2013, 11:14:31 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Very, very  true, Zeitun. Tradical, you are going to have a hard time covering up for DNF, there are too many victims of her cyberstalking, bullying behavior, and gross mistreatment. And  you participated on at least a few of the threads where she did some of her dirty work, so you can't be entirely oblivious. You're going to have to give that witch more than a coat of white-wash before you can trot her back out on the playing field. I sometimes thought you made a good point now and again, despite your egotistical smarminess. But now I am suspicious of the company you keep, and your ulterior motive in defending such people as DNF/Sharon J, Ballentine. So, dance off into the sunset with your two-headed, two-faced buddy, who will undoubtedly be seeping back up through the drains of Trad-dom as soon as she has a new nose-job and alias.
    Logged

    Offline Novus Weirdo

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 285
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Sharon Jane Ballatine
    « Reply #110 on: September 09, 2013, 11:42:44 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: tradical
    I came here (originally) to explain what had happened on the 'Sharon Ballentine' thread - the provided some explanation as to why the site went down.

    With respect to DNF - The accusations against her stalking etc was never demonstrated by the posting of the PM's etc.

    DNF stated on another thread that she was not Sharon B etc.  Given her posting history (from what I remember) and the lack of any real evidence - I see no reason to believe that she is this Sharon person.

    What Sharon B was/is - is another matter entirely.


    Still spinning it.  You have a sick obsession with her.  Good God, even AOL is telling you to give it up.

    Quote from: tradical
    If a thread that I post is 'ignored' by those who are uncomfortable with what I write, that is their prerogative.  

    The other denizens of Cathinfo will be able to decide for themselves.


    No one is uncomfortable with what you oink.  We just can't send it to the trash fast enough.

    Quote from: tradical
    Given the nature of online forums, I anticipate significant exchanges because what I post will definitely challenge some of the key assumptions held dearly by other posters on this site (as occurred on Ignis Ardens).


    Yes, and you're so on the ball that it'll be another 2 or 3 days in between posts.  And you being who you are, why would anyone ever put any stock into it?

    Quote from: tradical
    If this gets me banned (as some would like) then so be it.


     :pray:


    Logged

    Offline stgobnait

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1346
    • Reputation: +941/-65
    • Gender: Female
    Sharon Jane Ballatine
    « Reply #111 on: September 10, 2013, 03:13:14 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • clear as mud to me... all this... :confused1:
    Logged

    Offline Elizabeth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4845
    • Reputation: +2195/-15
    • Gender: Female
    Sharon Jane Ballatine
    « Reply #112 on: September 10, 2013, 08:48:16 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: tradical
    Quote from: 1st Mansion Tenant
    Some one on the thread having potty mouth does not make the Ballentine info untrue.


    Nor does it make it true.

    However, from what I remember of the thread it was a lot of different posts / links and the author was trying to prove the D.N.F. was the Ballentine woman.

    D.N.F. denied it etc, but the conspiracy kept on churning.

    God Bless!


    There simply was zero proof of anything about anybody.  On the IA thread I wrote that it looked like a psychology grad student's experiment in forum dynamics.

     Some of the same players who failed in their attempts to say I was three different people (and were corrected by Matthew here on Cathinfo) seem to be at it again.

    It just ran amok due to lack of forum moderators, IMO.  None of the stuff that happened would have gone so far downhill had there been mods.


    Logged

    Offline Elizabeth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4845
    • Reputation: +2195/-15
    • Gender: Female
    Sharon Jane Ballatine
    « Reply #113 on: September 10, 2013, 11:07:55 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Novus Weirdo

      You have a sick obsession with her.



      :facepalm:

    Logged

    Offline Elizabeth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4845
    • Reputation: +2195/-15
    • Gender: Female
    Sharon Jane Ballatine
    « Reply #114 on: September 10, 2013, 11:09:58 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: stgobnait
    clear as mud to me... all this... :confused1:


    Well, that's mudslinging and hoping something will stick for ya!
     :laugh2:
    Logged

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 33060
    • Reputation: +29377/-604
    • Gender: Male
    Sharon Jane Ballatine
    « Reply #115 on: September 10, 2013, 06:44:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • I received another e-mail from Patricia McKeever in which it was vehemently denied that "CrofterLady" was Sharon Jane Ballatine.

    She also ranted on against the Resistance, the SSPX, CathInfo... I skimmed a few words of it and promptly ignored it.
    Logged
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    My accounts (Paypal, Venmo) have been (((shut down))) PM me for how to donate and keep the forum going.

    Offline tradical

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 53
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Sharon Jane Ballatine
    « Reply #116 on: September 10, 2013, 06:50:28 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: 1st Mansion Tenant
    Very, very  true, Zeitun. Tradical, you are going to have a hard time covering up for DNF, there are too many victims of her cyberstalking, bullying behavior, and gross mistreatment. And  you participated on at least a few of the threads where she did some of her dirty work, so you can't be entirely oblivious. You're going to have to give that witch more than a coat of white-wash before you can trot her back out on the playing field. I sometimes thought you made a good point now and again, despite your egotistical smarminess. But now I am suspicious of the company you keep, and your ulterior motive in defending such people as DNF/Sharon J, Ballentine. So, dance off into the sunset with your two-headed, two-faced buddy, who will undoubtedly be seeping back up through the drains of Trad-dom as soon as she has a new nose-job and alias.


    This is interesting - I simply stated what I was aware of.

    Regarding the 'company you keep' - that could be said equally about the denizens of this forum.

    Also, your extension of 'defending Ballentine' is unwarranted.

    As far as dance off in the sunset - why?

    God Bless!
    Logged

    Offline Histrionics

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 80
    • Reputation: +75/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Sharon Jane Ballatine
    « Reply #117 on: September 10, 2013, 07:14:31 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Just wanted to say God bless!
    Logged

    Offline tradical

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 53
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Sharon Jane Ballatine
    « Reply #118 on: September 10, 2013, 07:15:43 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Histrionics
    Just wanted to say God bless!


    Thank you!
    Logged

    Offline parentsfortruth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3821
    • Reputation: +2664/-26
    • Gender: Female
    Sharon Jane Ballatine
    « Reply #119 on: September 10, 2013, 07:57:06 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Histrionics
    Just wanted to say God bless!


     :laugh1:

    I'll make an addition to this, and qualify it. God bless YOU!
    Logged
    Matthew 5:37

    But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.

    My Avatar is Fr. Hector Bolduc. He was a faithful parish priest in De Pere, WI,
    Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 16
    « previous next »