Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Bishop Williamson - women being allowed in public alone  (Read 869 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Bishop Williamson - women being allowed in public alone
« Reply #15 on: Yesterday at 07:50:49 PM »
Men who seem recently, to be CathInfo complaining about the sorry state of women, I’m presuming it is not the women at your chapel or where you hear Mass who are raging feminists, immodest, impure, immoral and everything repulsive. These are the numerous women in the world while at your chapel, there are very slim pickings, for example, a dozen women total and three are your sisters and four your cousins. That leaves five single women, none of whom you find attractive. You don’t hate them. They aren’t feminists, but well, they’re just not your type. Please let me know if I’m right.
Try, not having a chapel. After driving hours away, they are older, or they are undesirable for spiritual reasons. Those are the 5 women.

Re: Bishop Williamson - women being allowed in public alone
« Reply #16 on: Yesterday at 08:05:35 PM »
If you are insinuating beauty, it is not a factor at this point. Not for me, anyways. I love Our Blessed Virgin and she is beautiful, but that is not why. I have always liked dorks. It's the science that puts me off. I need a spiritually whole woman. That is missing even at the SSPX. There are other chapels out there, not without taking a plane for me, but I will move soon and get there. 

That leaves five single women, none of whom you find attractive. You don’t hate them. They aren’t feminists, but well, they’re just not your type. 
I am deeply sorry you have not had the best of luck. For whatever reason this chastisement you may not know now, but it is necessary. 


Re: Bishop Williamson - women being allowed in public alone
« Reply #17 on: Yesterday at 09:00:47 PM »
I did feel a bit on the defensive, like, No, of course I don’t go around with leg showing. But no harm done.
For the sake of clarity: I was referring to wearing a sufficiently long skirt with legs bare; without a stocking, not legs exposed like in a mini skirt.

I asked because in the thread on Mary-like modesty, where it was taught by the Church that women must wear opaque stockings, you stated in your first response:

What I’m saying is that Catholics should take the Mary-like Standards as guidelines rather than specific clothing rules to be followed to the letter. They were not written as such.
https://www.cathinfo.com/catholic-living-in-the-modern-world/origin-of-marylike-standards-of-modesty/msg1017512/#msg1017512