Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Seminary Cornerstone  (Read 11569 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Seminary Cornerstone
« on: April 22, 2013, 06:48:35 AM »
Our Priest was at the laying of the corner stone for the new Seminary.  Yesterday he gave very brief highlights.

1)    Bishop Fellay stated that if the Archbishop did not have the courage to Consecrate Bishops in 1988 the Traditional Latin Mass would be dead.
2)   Because of negotiations with Rome by the SSPX, the Traditional Mass was freed By BXVI.  Now there are over 200 Novus Ordo Bishops who say the Latin Mass.  
3)   Many of these Bishops have contacted the SSPX saying that once they are recognized by Rome they would like to have their seminarians trained by the  SSPX.

Although our priest didn’t say this, it is hypothesized that the reason for  building such a monster seminary is b/c +Fellay is anticipating a union with apostate Rome.  If each one of these Bishops sends five Seminarians, which is not an unreasonable number, the SSPX could get 1000 seminarians from these Novus Ordo Bishops.  

It is also hypothesized that 1000 new traditional priests a year, spread all around the world, would breathe new life into the Church like it has not seen in at least half a century.  This new diocese would then help fund this seminary so all the bills would be paid.

Two points don’t add up.  1) If these Bishops are so inspired by their new found Catholic Tradition, why don’t they start teaching this in their seminaries now or simply send their candidates for ordination to an Fraternity of St. Peter seminary?  2) Does +Fellay not realize that the end never justifies the means?

I would also note:  That like most SSPX priests these days, Our Priest did not mention the cost of such a recogniton by modernist Rome.  He did not speak of the dangers that such a compromise of the faith would have.  He did not mention how the Doctrinal Counter Offer of April 15, 2012 would destroy all the SSPX had stood for.  He only said that many of the 200 Bishops said they would like the SSPX to train their seminarians.  He did not say it, but he implied that this was a great thing!

Mary Help of Christians…PRAY FOR US!

Seminary Cornerstone
« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2013, 07:05:24 AM »
Because I believe for these priests the Society is their home wherever it ends up! The institution is more important than the faith! I guess the leadership decided that the market for its product would come from the conservative side of the conciliar church once a deal was struck. This investment will not be allowed to fail even if it pulls kids off streets.


Seminary Cornerstone
« Reply #2 on: April 22, 2013, 07:25:11 AM »
Quote from: Ekim
Our Priest was at the laying of the corner stone for the new Seminary.  Yesterday he gave very brief highlights.

1)    Bishop Fellay stated that if the Archbishop did not have the courage to Consecrate Bishops in 1988 the Traditional Latin Mass would be dead.
2)   Because of negotiations with Rome by the SSPX, the Traditional Mass was freed By BXVI.  Now there are over 200 Novus Ordo Bishops who say the Latin Mass.  
3)   Many of these Bishops have contacted the SSPX saying that once they are recognized by Rome they would like to have their seminarians trained by the  SSPX.



My family was told much the same thing at our chapel. I thought our priest said 300 N.O. Bishops. Could be his French accent.


Seminary Cornerstone
« Reply #3 on: April 22, 2013, 07:51:55 AM »
Quote from: Ekim

3)   Many of these Bishops have contacted the SSPX saying that once they are recognized by Rome they would like to have their seminarians trained by the  SSPX.


If these 200-300 N.O. Bishops truly/honestly liked traditionalism so much as to send their seminarians to be trained by the SSPX, they could/would have left the N.O. by now and became traditionalists.  

No, that's not what Rome wants at all and they're not stupid.

Once the neo-SSPX joins them, they'll make sure they will have a BIG say in what is and what shouldn't be taught at the semninary (it'll have to be a compromise if the neo-SSPX wants to be "normalized"). This will insure that the end product will result in a spoonful of the "old" teachings with a cupful of modernism/liberalism and thus the watering down process will begin.

Liberalism is a sin.

Seminary Cornerstone
« Reply #4 on: April 22, 2013, 08:17:55 AM »
I hope the new seminary is built, filled with seminarians, and directed by His Excellency Bishop Richard Williamson. Life is full of unexpected turns, as Menzugen is finding out these days.