News from:

http://tradcatresist.blogspot.ie/

We have just heard the following -
 
"A seminarian who was in the 5th year at the seminary of Ecône (a few weeks away from the important step of the sub-diaconate) was, it seems, abruptly dismissed from the seminary for reasons of opposition to the rallying. The family of this young man has often told the district superior of the SSPX in France of his concern about the direction taken by Bishop Fellay. The young man is very affected by this decision"  (http://resistance.vraiforum.com)

 Of course one hopes that this young man, after a period of reflection, may consider continuing his training with the SAJM. However one has to marvel at the hypocrisy at hand here. How often the SSPX salutes those brave opponents of the Francis regime who end up losing position or employment due to simply asking questions about the trajectory of the Pope. Yet when a seminarian in their own seminary does the same, they act in just such a fashion!

Pray that a trad bishop takes him under his tutelage for the remainder of his formation and ordains him.

From a human perspective, it is certainly an outrage how the sspx treats many seminarians, especially those who disagree with their philosophical dance with rome.  From a spiritual perspective, this is the greatest thing to ever happen to this seminarian.  It is certainly a blessing in disguise!  How many seminarians, with a healthy distrust of +Fellay's direction, attended the sspx because there was no other seminary option, yet after 6 years of propaganda and a few more after being ordained are now fully "on board" with a "deal", and thus will compromise their faith and lead countless other laity to destruction?  Many, and i've known a few personally.  Quality over quantity.  Let this seminarian flee the lukewarmness that is the sspx and find an orthodox seminary/Bishop!

Now, there was a big controversy with The Nine back in the day because a group of 3 seminarians just kept quiet about their sympathy with the expelled Nine until after they were ordained ... after which they promptly left and joined up with The Nine.  They were accused of "stealing the priesthood".  Had they spoken up and had been denied ordination, would that have been wrong as well?

Pray that a trad bishop takes him under his tutelage for the remainder of his formation and ordains him.

We have four bishops who stand for the one true Faith and against the infectious modernism that has set in the SSPX. Although the full circuмstances of the dismissal are unbeknownst to us, surely there is a solution that will rear its head for the good of the seminarian and Mother Church.
This also makes me substantially more leery of the young men recently ordained by the Society. How conformed are they to the new vision?
I am trying to assemble a litmus test to discern the stance of two such young priests here in my home province. It needs to be done in a way that my hand shall not be shown, at least not as of yet, with my standing behind His Lordship the Lion of England, our other three bishops of the Resistance.

Bait and switch from the SSPX I know too well from my school experience with them. Twas too late to back out of a moral agreement made to teach therein. Some good did come from the experience but it is one tour of duty that I would not want to repeat.
O what a web they weave, when they practice to deceive.

Were you trying to be poetic, or do you just structure your english in a very old english fashion that naturally suits itself to poetry?  Because, that really read like poetry.  And, I liked it.  

We have four bishops who stand for the one true Faith and against the infectious modernism that has set in the SSPX. Although the full circuмstances of the dismissal are unbeknownst to us, surely there is a solution that will rear its head for the good of the seminarian and Mother Church.
This also makes me substantially more leery of the young men recently ordained by the Society. How conformed are they to the new vision?
I am trying to assemble a litmus test to discern the stance of two such young priests here in my home province. It needs to be done in a way that my hand shall not be shown, at least not as of yet, with my standing behind His Lordship the Lion of England, our other three bishops of the Resistance.

And how does being sneaky benefit you or them in place of just being direct and asking them?  Which course of action would be more virtuous?  

Discretion be the better part of valour. Indeed subtlety. And charity above all else. I can but pray the young priests I know would be open to, that is, realize the problems of the SSPX, and join the Resistance. Alas I fear the comforts and stability of remaining with the sinking ship might prove too overwhelming, especially when a priest is just starting out. Pray they will choose wisely.

Remember again we are at war, and our conduct must be becoming according to that nature. Be very careful whom you trust, and what utterances pass through thy lips, lest damage be done to thy soul, thy neighbour's soul, and our glorious cause which is nothing more than the One True Faith itself.