Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Sellout Continues Crossing t's and dotting i's  (Read 1605 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cosmas

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 486
  • Reputation: +277/-141
  • Gender: Male
Sellout Continues Crossing t's and dotting i's
« on: November 25, 2018, 09:40:09 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • The Pagliarani-Fellay Neo-SSPX Is Not
    Archbishop Lefebvre's Original Traditional Catholic Society
    Pagliarani-Fellay Are Continuing the Process of Selling Out
    To Francis-Bergoglio's Marxist/Modernist Newchurch of the New Order
    Its Fake Sacraments and Its Fake Doctrine, Which Are Not Catholic
    Once the Neo-SSPX Completes Its Sellout to Newchurch
    It Will Be Mute in the Face of Newchurch Apostasy
    What is most noticeable about the Neo-SSPX these days is what it is not doing. It is silent in the face of Francis-Bergoglio's rampant apostasy from the Catholic Faith. As he attacks and destroys and engulfs and devours what is left of Christianity in the Newchurch of the New Order, Davide Pagliarani, the Neo-SSPX's new Superior General, an obvious puppet of the outgoing Bernie Fellay, says and does nothing, but quietly continues to cooperate with Newchurch.
    This cooperation is merely a prelude for what the Neo-SSPX will be like once it completes its sellout to Newchurch and accepts the "personal prelature" trap, putting the Neo-SSPX under the direct control of the Newpope. The Neo-SSPX will be mute in the face of Newchurch apostasy. While, as a personal prelature, its priest-presbyters may very well preach some of the truth at first, they will not be permitted to excoriate Newchurch hierarchs and presbyters for their heresy and outright apostasy. The Neo-SSPX now poses a real danger to true Catholicism. Groups like the the Trappists of Aachen and the Little Sisters of Mary, Mother of the Redeemer, could be fooled into affiliation with the Neo-SSPX, which will then become controlled by Newrome under the personal-prelature poison. A personal prelature would put the Neo-SSPX directly under Francis-Bergoglio and his heretical Marxist/Modernist advisors.
    But the situation is even worse than that. Under Canon 297 of the Newcode of Canon Law, a personal prelature would also give the local Newbishops the power to stop the Neo-SSPX dead from opening any apostolates in their respective Newsees. It even gives the Newbishops the power to prevent new apostolates of the Neo-SSPX in Newdioceses where they already exist. The fact that the Neo-SSPX would even consider a personal prelature is proof positive that its leadership is in collusion with this evil Newchurch farce.
    To make matters even worse, the Newcode actually includes a proper structure for the Neo-SSPX, once and only once Newchurch reverts to the Catholic Faith. That structure is a personal diocese, as found in section 2 of Newcanon 372. Notice that Newchurch will not even consider this structure. That is absolute proof that Newchurch means only to divide, decimate, and conquer the Neo-SSPX and any independent groups that are affiliated with the Neo-SSPX, i.e., those that depend upon the Neo-SSPX for their ordinations and confirmations through Neo-SSPX bishops. Even the Newchurch-NSSPX negotiations themselves are designed to divide the Neo-SSPX, so that it will become smaller and weaker once half of its members have left.
    On doctrine, Newrome has not budged a millimetre since Benedict-Ratzinger refused even to tolerate the Catholic Faith as it was held and defended for countless centuries. It is Davide Pagliarani, backed, no doubt, by Fellay, who is approaching Newrome to re-open negotiations, not vice versa. It is the Neo-SSPX that is ready to compromise. You know the old adage: in negotiations, the first party to move is the one who loses everything. Real traditional Catholic groups out there should avoid any association whatsoever with the Neo-SSPX at this point. There are four Resistance bishops and numerous other independent traditional Catholic bishops out there, not to speak of many thousands of independent traditional Catholic priests. The more a traditional bishop or priest denounces Newchurch and Newrome, the safer he is.


    Offline Stanley N

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1208
    • Reputation: +530/-484
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sellout Continues Crossing t's and dotting i's
    « Reply #1 on: November 25, 2018, 08:02:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • But the situation is even worse than that. Under Canon 297 of the Newcode of Canon Law, a personal prelature would also give the local Newbishops the power to stop the Neo-SSPX dead from opening any apostolates in their respective Newsees. 
    That's how it was in the times of Pius XII and before. Bishops could exclude a religious order seeking to establish a new church, monastery or convent. The anomaly is just going somewhere and opening up a chapel.


    Offline cosmas

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 486
    • Reputation: +277/-141
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sellout Continues Crossing t's and dotting i's
    « Reply #2 on: December 02, 2018, 01:43:33 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The SSPX  could get an ordinariate or a personal prelature and set it up to where they are only answerable to the Pope and bypass the local bishops. That would be more of an ideal situation. Now if we could get an orthodox , anti-modernist strong Pope. Something we all have to pray for.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41863
    • Reputation: +23919/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sellout Continues Crossing t's and dotting i's
    « Reply #3 on: December 02, 2018, 02:26:19 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •  Now if we could get an orthodox , anti-modernist strong Pope.

    Well, yeah, then there would be no need for Traditional Catholicism at all.

    Offline cosmas

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 486
    • Reputation: +277/-141
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sellout Continues Crossing t's and dotting i's
    « Reply #4 on: December 02, 2018, 02:55:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Ladislaus, i might be mistaken but isn't that hat opus dei has ?