Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: http:www.sossaveoursspx.com  (Read 12723 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

http:www.sossaveoursspx.com
« Reply #35 on: October 01, 2012, 10:26:22 AM »
Quote from: stgobnait
oh, let it go....  why demand your pound of flesh.....


Naturally, one shouldn't just let it go.

http:www.sossaveoursspx.com
« Reply #36 on: October 01, 2012, 10:42:41 AM »
Quote
oh, let it go....  why demand your pound of flesh....


Perhaps I am "feeding the trolls" but it would be interesting to establish as to why we should "let it go"? Let what go? I'm not particularly clear what you mean.

My conclusion drawn is the SSPX are now denying the sacraments to those who seek and promote truth.

I had 'Patricius' state I personally wouldn't know truth if it "kicked me up the backside".

Are you suggesting we sit back and place ourselves under "holy obedience" and not protest the injustice that the editor has experienced or are we 'delusional'?

I think it's disgusting he has been denied the sacraments. It's rather annoying when it is suggested to "let it go".


http:www.sossaveoursspx.com
« Reply #37 on: October 01, 2012, 11:40:33 AM »
Quote from: Neil Obstat
Good post, Magna.

I just came here from a new thread started by a member who knows the man
who's the editor of sossaveoursspx.com and he says this veteran firefighter was
indeed denied Communion because he runs that website.

Quote from: Zorayda (from the other thread)
... Our friend, father of 8, longtime supporter of SSPX and parishioner of Christ the King Church in Ridgefield, CT was denied Holy Communion by his pastor for having a website about the current SSPX/Rome crisis (only a few months old). This good man, a veteran firefighter, sacrifices his vacation time in order to attend Mass on Sundays & this is how he is treated by his pastor?


http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php/Denial-of-Sacraments



Meanwhile, NeelyAnn is still on the lam.



Meanwhile, it's now only 10 days to go before October 11th, which will be the
50th anniversary of the infamous Opening Speech of Vatican II, when John XXIII
of infalicitous memory
abandoned the power of the Keys of St. Peter in public, for
all with eyes to see, and ears to hear.

Was that the arrival of the grey horse of the Apocalypse?
Or, is the 50th anniversary, the "Golden Jubilee" rather its arrival?

They seem to be capable of scheduling things to happen at the same time, all
right: the Golden Jubilee ritual and +Fellay's promised ordinations of the
candidates who should not have been postponed in June in the first place. When
will they get it together and have the Collegial Consecration of Russia to the
Immaculate Heart of Mary, by the Pope and all the bishops of the world, on the
same day, at the same time (within reasonable limits)?

They seem to be quite capable of getting all the world's religions to show up at
Assisi for a display of nonsense. How about getting all the bishops to take 5
minutes to get something really worthwhile accomplished?









I thought on October 11, 1962 John XXIII on his death bed cried out "stop the council!!! Stop the council!!  Then september 20th 1963 Pope Paul Vi reopened it letting non catholics make chhages to our Mass and sacraments...  

Paul Vi dies on august 6 1978 and he admits that Satan was now in the sanctuary.

Divide and conquer  priest against priest and lay person against lay person.  This what vatican II promotes.

Please make sure the things I stated above are facts.  I'm going to write a letter to editors.  


http:www.sossaveoursspx.com
« Reply #38 on: October 02, 2012, 01:45:13 AM »
The “pound of flesh” analogy is not apt in the least.  To persevere in asking Neely Ann for the promised report – a report we can assume would have been received quickly if it had been advantageous to her position – is hardly akin to Shakespeare’s villainous Jєωιѕн usurer.

If any person is in danger of being cut “closest to the heart” it is the poor fellow who has been denied Our Lord in Holy Communion for the offense of publicly shaming certain persons in position of power.   What could be more grave then for a priest to wield the sacraments as a weapon of his displeasure?  I would tremble to be in such shoes.