Thanks Matthew. That sounds a lot more like the Sean I know and love. I think the Tradosphere would lose an essential part of itself if Sean Johnson relaxed his ideas about sede-anythingism. :)
Is that a joke?
It is a hallmark of liberalism to be attacking sedevacantists more than modernism.
As Matthew mentioned earlier, he considers sedvacantism more dangerous than modernism. That is very revealing.
It is revealing because the reason liberals hate sedevacantists is because even though they are wrong on the pope question, they see things in black and white when it comes to the crisis in the church. They know heresy from Truth. Liberals always equivocate when it comes to heresy and make excuses.
That is why I get on 10 times better with a sedevacantist than a liberal. Though they are annoying after a while, and I would rather neither at the end of the day.
So if Sean got his priorities straight then he would be useful. That, and becoming flat earth....