Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Sean Johnson interviews Bp. Williamson in Kansas, Nov 2022  (Read 23148 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MiracleOfTheSun

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 878
  • Reputation: +378/-146
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sean Johnson interviews Bp. Williamson in Kansas, Nov 2022
« Reply #60 on: November 20, 2022, 06:27:37 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The 5th installment is brief, about 8 minutes, but it may be a while before I can get it uploaded (i.e., I borrowed a camcorder for the interview, and neglected to download this final segment to my computer along with the rest, so I will need to get ahold of it again).

    The contents are basically His Excellency's final comments and advice to viewers. 

    During the course of these comments, His Excellency goes into recommending Garabandal. 

    I reply that I am not a big "private revelation guy," and therefore do not have all the details about Garabandal, but note that I am aware it is controversial.  I mention that one of the main objections to its authenticity is the strange phenomenon of the seers walking backwards, doing the spider walk, etc.

    To this, His Excellency replied that in all that strange walking, not for a second is there any immodesty, and there certainly should have been, given the positions/postures the seers were in, which His Excellency took as a protection from immodesty from heaven, and evidence of authenticity.

    He then advises 15 decades o the Rosary/day, and the interview concludes.

    It may be another week before I can upload this segment.

    Thanks for the update and the uploads.  While I'm a sede these days, those vids provided an excellent point-by-point history of the SSPX meltdown and other nuggets.  Very interesting content regarding Vigano as well.  Thanks again.

    Offline Incredulous

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 9541
    • Reputation: +9314/-1009
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sean Johnson interviews Bp. Williamson in Kansas, Nov 2022
    « Reply #61 on: November 20, 2022, 06:30:50 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I said nothing about charging interest.

    Just jokin Giles.
    As you probably know, old Maxie brokered a deal with a wealthy Marrano family to give a $100 million "gift" to the SSPX, around the time Bp. Williamson was making his exit from the Society. 
    "Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it underfoot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Our Lord Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor but a destroyer."  St. Francis of Assisi


    Offline hollingsworth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2834
    • Reputation: +2933/-523
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sean Johnson interviews Bp. Williamson in Kansas, Nov 2022
    « Reply #62 on: November 20, 2022, 06:46:55 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Quote
    As you probably know, old Maxie brokered a deal with a wealthy Marrano family to give a $100 million "gift" to the SSPX, around the time Bp. Williamson was making his exit from the Society.
     Was part of that money used to build the VA boondoggle, i.e. Fellay's spacious residence

    Offline Incredulous

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 9541
    • Reputation: +9314/-1009
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sean Johnson interviews Bp. Williamson in Kansas, Nov 2022
    « Reply #63 on: November 20, 2022, 07:06:15 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Was part of that money used to build the VA boondoggle, i.e. Fellay's spacious residence


    In Krah's infamous 2011 interview with Robt. Siscoe, he admitted part of the funds would be used for a new seminary.

    You could ask Fr. Asher the accounting details, since he was the initial Secretary of the SSPX new Seminary corporation.
    "Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it underfoot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Our Lord Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor but a destroyer."  St. Francis of Assisi

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47753
    • Reputation: +28253/-5289
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sean Johnson interviews Bp. Williamson in Kansas, Nov 2022
    « Reply #64 on: November 20, 2022, 07:07:26 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • In addition to the things I have considered diabolical about Garabadal, there are a couple of failed prophecies and its endorsement of the Great Council.  Clearly preternatural phenomena occurred there, so this was not a fraud of human origin.  That leaves the diabolical one.

    I agree with the Dimond Brothers' assssment that the point of it was to have people focus on a physical chastisement rather than to see the real chastisement right in front of them (Vatican II, the Conciliar Church, and the NOM).  Same can be said of Akita.  All the talk is about fire from heaven, etc ... but Cardinal Ciappi, who read the Third Secret, said it was about an apostasy in the Church beginning at the top.  Sister Lucy said that Our Lady wanted the Third Secret revealed by 1960.  When asked why, she stated that it would become much clearer then.  So ... Third Secret was supposed to be released right around 1960 and it warned of an apostasy in the Church that would be put in motion at that time.  Garabandal was put out there by the devil to distract from questioning why the Third Secret hadn't been released and to have everyone focusing on a future physical chastisement rather than on the ongoing spiritual one.


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47753
    • Reputation: +28253/-5289
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sean Johnson interviews Bp. Williamson in Kansas, Nov 2022
    « Reply #65 on: November 20, 2022, 07:17:10 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • There are two problems with this analysis:

    1) It is contradicted by Rome (e.g., That Rome understood Msgr. Lefebvre as having the "no practical accord before a doctrinal resolution" as his principle of action since La Pointet is proven by the quote in Part 1 of the interview with the quote from conciliar GREC/Roman priest Fr. Michel Lelong ), who certainly understood Msgr. Lefebvre of having this principle since 1988.  So it would be odd that both Rome and Msgr. de Galarreta (in his Reflections paper at Albano) would think such a principle to exist when it does not, and Msgr. Fellay himself admitting the existence of the principle in the Cor Unum of March 2012, when he hallucinated that "the new situation in Rome demands a new response from us," and announced he was moving away from it.

    2) The "wavering Lefebvre" argument sees only the external manifestation of the operative principle, without taking that operative principle itself into account: As Msgr. Williamson again explains in Part 1-2, Msgr. Lefebvre wanted to help Rome back to Tradition, and his willingness or unwillingness to negotiate always depended upon his perception of Rome's willingness to come back.  So when it looked like Rome was open to Tradition, he inclined towards them.  And when it looked like they were falling into the abyss, he backed away from them.  When he lost faith in the intentions of Rome in 1988, that was it.  His principles never changed, only extrinsic conditions did.  It was for this reason that the starting point for GREC in 1997 was to reestablish trust. 

    The Romans understand Lefebvre far better than his progeny (or the sedevacantists).

    Wrong.  Archbishop Lefebvre clearly wavered on principle.  It's very well docuмented, which is why neo-SSPX can lay claim to him, and why Father Cekada could release the video "Archbishop Lefebvre Sedevacantist."

    This is revisionism ... from yet another one playing tug-o-war with the Archbishop.  Now, it's clear the he concluded his life with the mindeset that is most akin to the Resistance, beginning from the time leadiing up to Assisi, then the consecrations, but he was still trying to cut a deal, a very practical one at that, with Rome weeks and months before he finally went ahead with the consecrations.  For some years he was pleading for just a place in the Conciliar Pantheon, to be permitted to make the experimet of Tradition.

    Offline de Lugo

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 563
    • Reputation: +421/-74
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sean Johnson interviews Bp. Williamson in Kansas, Nov 2022
    « Reply #66 on: November 20, 2022, 07:19:01 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • Wrong.  Archbishop Lefebvre clearly wavered on principle.  It's very well docuмented, which is why neo-SSPX can lay claim to him, and why Father Cekada could release the video "Archbishop Lefebvre Sedevacantist."

    This is revisionism ... from yet another one playing tug-o-war with the Archbishop.  Now, it's clear the he concluded his life with the mindeset that is most akin to the Resistance, beginning from the time leadiing up to Assisi, then the consecrations, but he was still trying to cut a deal with Rome weeks and months before he finally went ahead with the consecrations.

    Whatever protects your narrative.
    Noblesse oblige.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47753
    • Reputation: +28253/-5289
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sean Johnson interviews Bp. Williamson in Kansas, Nov 2022
    « Reply #67 on: November 20, 2022, 07:22:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Whatever protects your narrative.

    I have no narrative.  It's you who have the narrative rooted in wishful thinking.  In fact, at the end of the day, I don't care.  Archbishop Lefebvre was a great man, but he was no infallible divine oracle.  I agree with him on some things, and disagree with him on others.

    This entire "WE are the true heirs of Archibshop Lefebvre." vs. "No, WE are." is childish.  I have no dog in this race, since I don't feel the need to agree with him on everything, and I'm looking at it objectively.

    And this speaks to the fact that without the presece of real, legitimate Catholic authority, people are clinging to substitute personality cults, and so end up polarizing everything.

    We should not be turning individuals into idols ... whether it's Archbishop Lefebvre or Bishop Williamson or anyone else.  It's perfectly permissible to disagree with either one of them on this, that, or the other point.  And it is perfectly possible to hold both of them in great respect, as I do, while still disagreeing with them on some things.


    Offline de Lugo

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 563
    • Reputation: +421/-74
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sean Johnson interviews Bp. Williamson in Kansas, Nov 2022
    « Reply #68 on: November 20, 2022, 07:29:10 PM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • I have no narrative.  It's you who have the narrative rooted in wishful thinking.  In fact, at the end of the day, I don't care.  Archbishop Lefebvre was a great man, but he was no infallible divine oracle.  I agree with him on some things, and disagree with him on others.

    This entire "WE are the true heirs of Archibshop Lefebvre." vs. "No, WE are." is childish.  I have no dog in this race, since I don't feel the need to agree with him on everything, and I'm looking at it objectively.

    You did not overcome my rebuttal, but merely insist upon the same argument I refuted the first time (i.e., you added nothing new; you are just repeating yourself with stronger language. Will the next response be stronger language still?).

    In order to do so, you must explain

    1) Why Rome and the SSPX understood Msgr. Lefebvre as having the principle you deny.

    2) Show Lefebvre wavering after 1988.

    I'll be here waiting.

    Noblesse oblige.

    Offline Yeti

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4212
    • Reputation: +2458/-532
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sean Johnson interviews Bp. Williamson in Kansas, Nov 2022
    « Reply #69 on: November 20, 2022, 07:35:47 PM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • In addition to the things I have considered diabolical about Garabadal, there are a couple of failed prophecies
    .

    There's a blog that did a great writeup on that creepy "apparition". I'll just post it here:



    The (Disturbing) Facts of Garabandal
    1. On the Garabandal website, https://www.garabandal.us/, it says, "On June 18, 1961, four girls, Conchita Gonzalez (12), Mari Cruz Gonzalez (11) Jacinta Gonzalez (12), and Mari Loli Mazon (12) were playing on the outskirts of the village when they heard a sound like thunder." 
    Problems:
    • The girls were not "playing"--they had committed sin by stealing apples. 
    • They had felt guilty and decided to "throw stones at the devil" who is "to the left side"
    • When they heard the thunder they felt thrust onto their knees as if by some unseen force
    When they went into "ecstasy" and had visions, they were bent over backwards and walked that way so quickly, many of the villagers had a hard time keeping up by running forwards. Last year a movie about Garabandal was released (see https://www.garabandalthemovie.com/en/). The movie accurately displays how Conchita looked in this state--see picture below:
    Immediately, it reminded me about a movie poster from a horror movie concerning possession:


    Walking and doing things backwards is also a sign of the Satanic. Moving backwards is exactly what occultist Aleister Crowley wrote about in his book Magick in Theory and Practice:

     First Method. Let the Exempt Adept first train himself to think backwards by external means, as set forth here following.

    (“a”) Let him learn to write backwards, with either hand.
    (“b”) Let him learn to walk backwards.
    (“c”) Let him constantly watch, if convenient, cinematograph films, and listen to phonograph records, reversed, and let him so accustom himself to these that they appear natural, and appreciable as a whole.
    (“d”) Let him practice speaking backwards; thus for “I am He” let him say, “Eh ma I”.
    (“e”) Let him learn to read backwards. In this it is difficult to avoid cheating one’s self, as an expert reader sees a sentence at a glance. Let his disciple read aloud to him backwards, slowly at first, then more quickly.
    (“f”) Of his own ingenium, let him devise other methods. 
    (See online at http://www.sacred-texts.com/oto/lib913.htm; Emphasis mine)

    2. The “Virgin” asked that the girls not bring blessed sacramentals [rosaries, crucifixes, etc.], because she wanted to bless these objects herself. The vision is reported to have blessed and kissed hundreds of objects, such as pebbles, which were treated as "sacramentals." This is troubling for two reasons: first, because only blessed sacramentals affect the devil and fallen angels; second, the Blessed Virgin Mary is not a priest and therefore she cannot confer a priestly blessing--especially upon mundane objects like pebbles.

    3. A priest, Fr. Luis Andreu, went with the children as they marched backwards into the woods like they had "wings on their heels." He then claimed he believed in the apparitions and was "overwhelmed with joy." While telling all this to Fr. Valentin, the pastor of the village church, Fr. Andreu suddenly declared that he felt sleepy, lowered his head, coughed, and died on the spot. The priest was young (not more than 40 years old), and had no history of heart problems, no family history of heart problems, and had not been seriously ill. Garabandal supporters claim he "died from joy." It was claimed by the seers his body would be found incorrupt.  When his body was exhumed, it was decomposing normally. Defenders of the apparitions claim that his body will become incorrupt after "The Great Miracle." My readers can correct me, but I've never heard of a saint's body going from corruption to incorruption. Moreover, the seers never said this beforehand, it was made up post factum upon finding his body in a state of corruption.

    4. At the death of Roncalli (John XXIII), many people wished the Council to end. Conchita said that she knew that the next "pope" would continue the Council, and she was happy about it.

    5.  Conchita and the seers were often found in contradictions regarding the dates of the alleged "Great" miracle, warning, chastisement, etc. 

    6. The children would often open their mouths and stick out their tongues while St. Michael the Archangel would give them "invisible Holy Communion." To end the incredulity of some, Conchita claimed God would prove this was true. On July 18, 1962, during a nighttime ecstasy, there is film footage of what appears to be a Communion Host appearing on Conchita's tongue which she then consumes. Conchita reportedly admitted to Father J. Pelletier that she herself had stolen the Host from the tabernacle of the Church and placed It on the roof of her mouth, letting It drop down on her tongue for the so-called "mystical Communion." 

    7. Many men testified that while in their ecstasies and on their knees bent backwards, the girls were rigid and impossible to move. It was if they were frozen and weighed hundreds of pounds. The men of the village could neither lift or move small, thin girls. 

    8. Conchita reportedly said the Blessed Mother "played hide and seek" with her.

    9. All four children signed a docuмent with the Vatican II bishop agreeing with the findings of the  Counterfeit Church and promising never to promote the apparitions again. Does that sound like something real seers would do? The children at Fatima refused to retract what they had seen and heard even when an evil man threatened to kill them unless they did so. The girls at Garabandal later retracted their retraction. 

    10. The Night of the Screams: This point is worthy of special mention as those who accept Garabandal use it to assert the apparitions were a warning against Vatican II. This event was actually over two nights; June 18 and 19, 1962. Two of the seers, Mari-Loli and Jacinta went into the woods on the edge of town. They went into ecstasy on their knees and they shouted to "Mary," --"Don't tell us these things!" They then screamed all night in such a terrifying manner that the whole village was up and afraid to approach them. The other two seers remained in the village. The sounds were so frightening, here's what a burly villager said in an interview: "Look, I don't want to brag, but I'm a man, it might be said, who doesn't know fear..but on those nights of the screams, with everyone together in darkness, in silence, hearing the girls' sobbing and screeching in the distance, I shook so that my knees knocked against each other so much I couldn't stop them. You can't imagine what it was. I have never experienced anything like it." (Testimony of Mr. Pepe Diez, stonemason in Garabandal).

    On the second night, Conchita joined them in the screams. Only the prayers of the villagers made the screams subside. Every single resident of Garabandal asked their priest to hear their Confession the next day. What caused the screaming? They were allegedly told that prior to the three "Great" events, the Church would be nearly destroyed and the Mass would nearly disappear. They also saw the "reappearance"  of Communism.

    Was this a vision of Vatican II, and a major resurgence of Communism post 1989? Consider this: What could be more frightening than seeing Hell? Yet when the three children at Fatima were shown Hell by the Blessed Mother, there was no screaming. And why would the Blessed Mother inflict such fear for two whole nights? I can only imagine how frightening seeing little girls bent backwards in the woods at night screaming at the sky with unearthly sounds for hours must be.

    11. At the last appearance in 1965, Conchita claimed that Archangel Michael had to tell her the message because "Mary was too upset to speak." She stood under the Cross of Her Son, but couldn't deliver a message from Heaven?

    12. In 1966 Conchita wanted to enter the Carmelite Convent in Pamplona. "Jesus" told her to go back to the world (!) The Garabandal messages acknowledge the validity of Vatican II, the false religion it created, and its false popes.

    13. Joseph Lomangino, a blind man, was promised by "Our Lady" that she would restore his sight on the day of the "Great Miracle." Mr. Lomangino died on June 18, 2014 at the age of 86 at his home in New York. Rather than admit this "prophesy" was false, promoters and defenders of Garabandal point to the fact that he died on June 18th--exactly 53 years after the first "apparition" and there is some "mystical significance." Perhaps he recovered his sight spiritually, not physically, etc.  Yet the Great Miracle did not occur, and they can't escape that fact.

    14. Two of the "seers" admitted to hiding a statue of the Blessed Mother in the woods so they could claim Mary told them where to go and find it. They did this (allegedly) because they were jealous that "Mary" talked to Conchita the most.

    15. Where are the seers today? Mari Loli Mazon came to the United States and lived in New Hampshire until her death in 2009, just before turning 60 years old. Jacinta González became Jacinta Moynihan and lives with her husband and daughter in California. Mari Cruz González lives in Aviles, Spain with her husband and four children. Conchita made a museum of her house in Garabandal. She has since sold that house and owns a house in New York with her husband and a flat in Fatima as well. Compare that with St. Bernadette in Lourdes. Conchita (like the others) all attend the Vatican II sect. Sadly, Conchita lives within an hour of the SSPV, SSPX, and Fr. DePauw's Ave Maria Chapel, none of which she will attend, because she fully accepts Vatican II.

    Offline Donachie

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2566
    • Reputation: +620/-258
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sean Johnson interviews Bp. Williamson in Kansas, Nov 2022
    « Reply #70 on: November 20, 2022, 08:38:53 PM »
  • Thanks!4
  • No Thanks!1
  • Sorry but Purtin's a Jew and he's off course about Putin. Putin's "Orthodox" faith is a joke and false indeed. He's close to Wagner Group that likes to make snuff films for political statements, e.g. Putin's sledgehammer. Putin's body count is extensive. He was a Stasi Major besides KGB (((insider))).


    Offline gladius_veritatis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 8190
    • Reputation: +2557/-1124
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sean Johnson interviews Bp. Williamson in Kansas, Nov 2022
    « Reply #71 on: November 20, 2022, 08:45:36 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!2
  • Show Lefebvre wavering after 1988.

    Dead 31+ years.  Did much good, but far from perfect.  Move on.

    + RIP +
    "Fear God, and keep His commandments: for this is all man."

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47753
    • Reputation: +28253/-5289
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sean Johnson interviews Bp. Williamson in Kansas, Nov 2022
    « Reply #72 on: November 20, 2022, 11:08:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You did not overcome my rebuttal, but merely insist upon the same argument I refuted the first time (i.e., you added nothing new; you are just repeating yourself with stronger language. Will the next response be stronger language still?).

    In order to do so, you must explain

    1) Why Rome and the SSPX understood Msgr. Lefebvre as having the principle you deny.

    2) Show Lefebvre wavering after 1988.

    I'll be here waiting.

    I already answered #2 BEFORE you posted this (please see above ... with a couple typos corrected here) ...
    Quote
    Now, it's clear the he concluded his life with the mindset that is most akin to the Resistance, beginning from the time leading up to Assisi, then the consecrations ...

    #1 ... it all depends on the timing.  Sometimes he did; sometimes he did not.

    But, more than anything, I second gladius' comment that the Archbishop passed on over 31 years ago now, and secondly ... what does it matter?  He was a great man, but that doesn't stop me from disagreeing with some things he did or said.

    I also think people need to stop assuming that changing one's position shows weakness or lack of resolution.  To me, it actually shows some refreshing honesty and humility, that someone isn't so wedded to a particular theological position that he's not willing to reconsider it based on new information or new insights.  Who would not be confused by this crisis in the Church?  I've changed my mind about some things a few times, and I remain open to changing my mind again.  I don't know of any Traditional bishop or priest who hasn't changed at least a little bit here or there ... other than those who didn't think much, i.e. those who just were about the Mass, the smells and bells, and didn't think that the ideas or the theology mattered, since they don't make a practical difference.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47753
    • Reputation: +28253/-5289
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Sean Johnson interviews Bp. Williamson in Kansas, Nov 2022
    « Reply #73 on: November 20, 2022, 11:15:06 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Sorry but Purtin's a Jєω and he's off course about Putin. Putin's "Orthodox" faith is a joke and false indeed. He's close to Wagner Group that likes to make snuff films for political statements, e.g. Putin's sledgehammer. Putin's body count is extensive. He was a Stasi Major besides KGB (((insider))).

    :facepalm: ... this is nothing pure speculation, including some amazing discernment of the internal forum, yet arrogantly presented as fact.

    Offline Miser Peccator

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4351
    • Reputation: +2041/-458
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Sean Johnson interviews Bp. Williamson in Kansas, Nov 2022
    « Reply #74 on: November 20, 2022, 11:32:03 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • God bless him! 

    Statement at Part 4 at 7min mark:


    "He's (Trump) highly defective because the good man obviously doesn't know about the problem with the Jєωs."

    His Excellency is a great advocate for the truth and must not be aware of a few things.

    Sean would you be able to inform him of the following:

    This is Trump's Rabbi and Kabbalah instructor:




    Eitan Yardeni

    (who can be reached at Kabbalah.com)








    This was written in 2004, long before Ivanka married Kushner so it has nothing to do with Kushner's influence.

    Trump put Kabbalah spells on the Whitehouse:


    A Moroccan Kabbalist in the White House

    "the election of Trump does not only mean that there will be Shabbat candles every Friday night at the White House, but that Moroccan mystic kabbalists will bless the White House from Ashdod every Shabbat."7

    https://muse.jhu.edu/article/662551/pdf



    And Trump and Putin are slated to rebuild the Third Temple.


    https://www.cathinfo.com/fighting-errors-in-the-modern-world/trump-and-putin-slated-to-build-third-temple/


    All of the info in that thread including the links to Mark79's posts about

    Putin and Trump's involvement with Chabad

    and the ushering in of the Moshiach (Antichrist!) is very important.


    It's clear that contrary to His Excellency's statements,

    Trump and Putin both know a great deal about the Jєωs

    the ushering in of the Moshiach (Antichrist!)

    and the rebuilding of the Third Temple

    and they don't see a problem with any of it.

    They are very much a part of it.



    It would be great if somebody could let Vigano know as well!
    I exposed AB Vigano's public meetings with Crowleyan Satanist Dugin so I ask protection on myself family friends priest, under the Blood of Jesus Christ and mantle of the Blessed Virgin Mary! If harm comes to any of us may that embolden the faithful to speak out all the more so Catholics are not deceived.



    [fon