So, the biggest red light about +Schneider's latest criticism of +Vigano is his falsely having presented the "Opinion 3" as the teaching of the Church. He's claiming that the Church teaches Opinion 3. He HAS to know this is false. It's one thing to hold the opinion yourself ... which he's entitled to do, since the Church has not condemned it ... and quite another to claim that it's the Church's teaching.
Second red light about +Schneider is that every time +Vigano says something that might cause fence-sitting Trad, Inc. type Catholics to consider moving to Tradition, they roll out +Schneider to do damage control.
Between these two factors, I'm all but convinced that +Schneider is working for Jorge.
I'm also perplexed by the fact that Jorge hasn't disciplined +Schneider or silenced him, when he's said far worse about Jorge than +Strickland ever did. +Huonder has also said negative things about Jorge, but not only has he not been silenced, but he's evidently there at SSPX with Jorge's blessing and approval. One could say the same thing about +Vigano, except I think that the problem there is that if Jorge clamped down on him, the media would recall +Vigano's history with Jorge, which started with his exposing Jorge's protection of the sodomite rapist McCarrick, and people could easily infer that this is Jorge's way of retaliating for that and implying that he's continuing to do damage control for rapists, and Jorge would just generally like to keep the McCarrick situation out of the papers and not have everyone reminded of it.
Topic: Schneider sent in for damage control contra Vigano (Read 6939 times)