Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] 23 24 ... 26

Author Topic: SAJM leaves the resistance??? (Apostles of Jesus and Mary)  (Read 6919 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline TomGubbinsKimmage

Re: SAJM leaves the resistance??? (Apostles of Jesus and Mary)
« Reply #105 on: April 21, 2026, 10:40:39 AM »
Quote from: Godefroy on April 21, 2026, 10:18:45 AM
This is why the "none of the above" option in the poll on preferred trad type came first.



 

None of the Bishops are good enough ?
Logged

Offline TomGubbinsKimmage

Re: SAJM leaves the resistance??? (Apostles of Jesus and Mary)
« Reply #106 on: April 21, 2026, 01:20:37 PM »
Quote from: Tarmac Turkey on April 20, 2026, 11:40:25 AM


In the last seven years of my apostolate, I have traveled to many other countries besides France and have had the opportunity to meet or hear about priests who opposed, in 2012 (or later), this attempt at “reconciliation” by the SSPX, but then moved closer to sedevacantism, even going so far as to ask (some of them) to be ordained by sedevacantist bishops. And they continued to call themselves the Resistance , some going so far as to say or be called: the only true resistance .



The priests who went Thuc line and Fr. Hewko are NOT THE SAME as Bishops Vigano, Stobnicki, Morgan and Ballini. Nor are they the same as the multitude of clergy across the whole world who associate with them. All of whom at this point vastly OUTNUMBER the SAJM.

Trying to equivocate here is a form of gaslighting/manipulation to get us to accept the false theory that priests should all be in a group. When in fact MOST priests should be independent.
Logged

Offline Tarmac Turkey

Re: SAJM leaves the resistance??? (Apostles of Jesus and Mary)
« Reply #107 on: April 22, 2026, 01:00:44 AM »
Quote from: TomGubbinsKimmage on April 21, 2026, 01:20:37 PM

The priests who went Thuc line and Fr. Hewko are NOT THE SAME as Bishops Vigano, Stobnicki, Morgan and Ballini. Nor are they the same as the multitude of clergy across the whole world who associate with them. All of whom at this point vastly OUTNUMBER the SAJM.

Trying to equivocate here is a form of gaslighting/manipulation to get us to accept the false theory that priests should all be in a group. When in fact MOST priests should be independent.
The Dom Lefebvre seminary has made their position clear as to their association with what is widely known as the Resistance. They will still collaborate with priests that follow the line of Archbishop Lefebvre unlike some of the priests that claim to be in the Resistance but have departed from the stance the Archbishop took towards the crisis in the Church which is why the Resistance started in the first place. 
Logged

Offline TomGubbinsKimmage

Fr. Brocard confirms leaving the resistance
« Reply #108 on: April 22, 2026, 02:10:13 AM »
Quote from: Tarmac Turkey on April 22, 2026, 01:00:44 AM
The Dom Lefebvre seminary has made their position clear as to their association with what is widely known as the Resistance. They will still collaborate with priests that follow the line of Archbishop Lefebvre unlike some of the priests that claim to be in the Resistance but have departed from the stance the Archbishop took towards the crisis in the Church which is why the Resistance started in the first place.



No that's not true.

The resistance follows the line of Archbishop Lefebvre. Bishop Williamson. Did you not read this thread? https://www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/bishop-williamson-defines-the-resistance/

It's important to be very clear. FR BROCARD IS STARTING HIS OWN NEW GROUP. A group with NEW principles, completely INVENTED by him.

He is leaving us.


This is all anyone needs to know.




So lets put it like this: If you think any priest saying the pre 55 is committing a mortal sin, and sinning by working independently, then you will fit right in with the SAJM. However, if you agree on the other hand with Bishop Williamson on independence of priests, in order to preserve their faith, then stick with us and Bishops Stobnicki, Morgan, Vigano and Ballini. The other three are yet to clarify things for us, so we can let them do that if they want.

So far as we can tell this is Fr. Brocard speaking only as head of the seminary.
Logged

Offline Tarmac Turkey

Re: Fr. Brocard confirms leaving the resistance
« Reply #109 on: April 22, 2026, 04:52:19 AM »
Quote from: TomGubbinsKimmage on April 22, 2026, 02:10:13 AM


No that's not true.

The resistance follows the line of Archbishop Lefebvre. Bishop Williamson. Did you not read this thread? https://www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/bishop-williamson-defines-the-resistance/

It's important to be very clear. FR BROCARD IS STARTING HIS OWN NEW GROUP. A group with NEW principles, completely INVENTED by him.

He is leaving us.


This is all anyone needs to know.




So lets put it like this: If you think any priest saying the pre 55 is committing a mortal sin, and sinning by working independently, then you will fit right in with the SAJM. However, if you agree on the other hand with Bishop Williamson on independence of priests, in order to preserve their faith, then stick with us and Bishops Stobnicki, Morgan, Vigano and Ballini. The other three are yet to clarify things for us, so we can let them do that if they want.

So far as we can tell this is Fr. Brocard speaking only as head of the seminary.
Would you reckon that Fr Brocard and his seminary aren't following in the footsteps of Archbishop Lefebvre? And if so, in what way?

I've never heard anyone say that a priest using the pre 55 liturgy or working independently is committing a mortal sin. 

Logged
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] 23 24 ... 26
« previous next »