CathInfo.com

Let's call them "lefebvrists".  Just received their 2025 Newsletter..? Looks like it's growing.
And 2 Sundays ago Fr. Hewko repeated that he was of the 'resistance' of the popes Pius IX, Leo XIII, Pius X,  Benedict XV, Pius XI, and Pope Pius XII. Can anyone suggest / coin a term for that species of resistance?  PLP resistance...?
Kind of a dilemma, no?

I resist neoSSPX because hopefully, if the pressure grows directly against their dream of joining Novus Ordo Rome, they might throw the gear shifter in Reverse and  listen to +Lefebvre when the smoke disappears.

    _=-0--------0-    <-----------------------<-------------------

Fr. Hewko is totally on his own. Why are you listening to him.

The Director's Word – Is SAJM abandoning the Resistance? – #05

Dear friends and benefactors,
Let us take a brief pause in our exposition on the mystery of the Church in order to answer a question that was put to us after our first statement (presentation of SAJM): Is SAJM leaving the Resistance?
This first text, written to introduce the SAJM seminar in Brazil to Brazilians, received a much wider dissemination outside of Brazil that I did not expect and was far from seeking. This compels me to publish this response in Portuguese, French, and English.
To answer that question, it would first be necessary to define what is commonly called Resistance.
Now, to our knowledge, no dogmatic letter for signature was presented to the priests so that they could officially become part of this movement. Nothing positive. The only thing that seems to be the common denominator is opposition to the SSPX since its attempt at "reconciliation" with conciliar Rome in 2012. Something negative; defined not by principles to be followed, but by opposition.
In the last seven years of my apostolate, I have traveled to many other countries besides France and have had the opportunity to meet or hear about priests who opposed, in 2012 (or later), this attempt at “reconciliation” by the SSPX, but then moved closer to sedevacantism, even going so far as to ask (some of them) to be ordained by sedevacantist bishops. And they continued to call themselves the Resistance , some going so far as to say or be called: the only true resistance .
So, if you ask me: do you distinguish yourself from those who resist ? My answer is clear: yes, absolutely, and as much as Archbishop Lefebvre showed us by example in his life.
Now, if you ask me if I wouldn't collaborate with priests who opposed joining the SSPX and who, because of that, suffered greatly, I will answer just as immediately and clearly that it would be an honor for me to collaborate in the apostolate with these dear confreres, models and guides in this battle, as long as they are faithful to the legacy that Archbishop Lefebvre left us.
The purpose of that presentation—which, I recall, was intended for Brazilians—was to prevent the seminar I was tasked with from being labeled a " Resistance seminar ," for the reasons explained above.
Monsignor Faure, superior of the SAJM, asked me to assume the direction of the seminary that Monsignor Thomas Aquinas entrusted to us. It is, therefore, a seminary of the SAJM, which is not defined by its opposition to the SSPX, but by its fidelity to Archbishop Lefebvre.
Hoping this brief message has cleared up any doubts, I wish everyone a blessed Holy Week and a holy Easter.
† P. Brocard

• 01.04.2026

https://seminariodomlefebvre.com/en/2026/04/01/a-palavra-do-diretor-a-sajm-esta-deixando-a-resistencia-05/