Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Father Fox Conference after the Sermon  (Read 5440 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Neil Obstat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18177
  • Reputation: +8277/-692
  • Gender: Male
Father Fox Conference after the Sermon
« Reply #15 on: June 30, 2012, 03:42:25 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Bishop Fellay and his ignominious groupies have a lot to answer for in July.

    You just know a lot of what they'll be saying will be a waste of hot air, though.

    The scorpion on the water bank had an answer for all 3 of the frog's concerns.

    It is typical of Modernist speech to say many words and have little content,
    after all, what they're about is the destruction of something, not the building
    up of something. Building takes time, trouble and effort, but tearing it down
    takes a well-placed stick of dynamite, and a match.

    You can see in all the Vat. II docuмents the parts that have made all the problems
    are short phrases, or even one word among thousands.

    "It's my nature: self-destruction," said the scorpion.

    This very encouraging sermon by Fr. Fox provides a most potent analogy, with the
    frog and the scorpion. It goes a long way to give us the mental picture we need
    to aptly consider the ramifications of the present situation.

    We are all indebted to Fr. Fox for this lesson. We need to hear this.

    And thanks to MD for the transcript. I would never have been able to hear this
    with the sound quality what it is. Much obliged!
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline cathman7

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 815
    • Reputation: +883/-23
    • Gender: Male
    Father Fox Conference after the Sermon
    « Reply #16 on: June 30, 2012, 07:24:19 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yes, thank you MD!

    Fr. Fox gave a simple, clear and strong defense of the faith and for this he was reprimanded?

    I always remember a story I was told years ago about some students of Fr. Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange wishing to convert some modernists but who came back accepting the arguments of the modernists themselves! Lesson: be very careful in your dealing with modernists because you are liable to start accepting their premises.

    What good is it to have a merely practical agreement when the modernists are still running the show?


    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8277/-692
    • Gender: Male
    Father Fox Conference after the Sermon
    « Reply #17 on: July 03, 2012, 01:13:50 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This speech is a great reference point, because of this part:




    ...
    So, I would ask the question, why is it that around the world now, a lot of Traditional Catholics are very, very upset? Why is it each day the priests in the Society more and more they are getting more upset by all this? Well maybe it has something to do with these things:

    25 Oct 2007 – The Pope went to the interreligious meeting in Naples
    2008 April – he visits the ѕуηαgσgυє in New York
    2008 – he went to (Sydney?) cultural liturgy, a pagan ritual
    May 2009 – visited the Dome of the Rock mosque in Jerusalem
    2009 – Jєωιѕн ritual at the Wailing Wall, which is something Jews only do
    January 2010 – feast at the ѕуηαgσgυє in Rome
    May 2011 – the Beatification of John Paul II
    And then Assisi

    The fact is, the people who come to our chapels who read and study are going, “no, no, we cannot have anything to do with this.”
    ...


    If Fr. Fox were to give this speech today, only a week later, he would not give the
    same speech. For there has been an event that fairly trumps all these other 8
    in one fell swoop. What is it, you may ask?

    It is Benedict XVI's new choice to replace Wm. Levada as the head of the CDF
    with Bishop Muller from Germany.

    Why is this appointment so bad, you may ask?

    It is so bad because Muller is going to be in charge of making the specifications
    for the reconciliation of the SSPX with Rome, and for enforcing any penalties,
    and that kind of thing.

    But how can that be bad, you may ask?

    It not only can be bad, it IS bad, because Muller is a known heretic, 4 times
    over, perhaps more. But he has never been identified as a heretic by the Church.
    You see, while the Church abandons the faithful to the wild beasts of heresy, by
    not condemning error since 1962 (the 50th anniversary of which will be
    CELEBRATED in October of this year!), the faithful therefore have to decide or at
    least to notice when a heretic denies dogma previously defined, or embraces
    heresy previously condemned.

    Anything once condemned by a Pope is condemned forever.

    But here, Benedict XVI is ignoring the heresies of Muller, and promotes him to
    the office that will then oversee the "deal" with the SSPX.

    These two things should not only be reason to not make a deal with Rome, but
    also to EXPEL +FELLAY who has been promoting this big lie for years already,
    all the while refusing to share information, and now we know why he refuses; and
    second, for the remaining 3 bishops, after +Fellay is deposed and expelled from
    the Society, should CONSECRATE AT LEAST 2 NEW BISHOPS, perhaps 3, because
    there is a lot of work to do now that the dead wood has been removed.
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.