Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Rule Violator #2: JPaul  (Read 21840 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Rule Violator #2: JPaul
« Reply #110 on: June 09, 2018, 03:57:26 PM »
There johnson goes again.  ABL said it is a DIFFERENT faith.

Yet johnson goes on to say it is has 'proper intention' of the catholic church.  

Can't get any more cognitive dissonance than that.
one can only lead a horse to water...

Re: Rule Violator #2: JPaul
« Reply #111 on: June 09, 2018, 04:04:37 PM »
one can only lead a horse to water...
ya, then the horse changes the water into koolaid.


Re: Rule Violator #2: JPaul
« Reply #112 on: June 09, 2018, 04:08:53 PM »
johnson, how much of what ABL said the new church is not catholic for you to understand it is not catholic?

No catholic = no intention of the Catholic church.

Is that simple enough?

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Rule Violator #2: JPaul
« Reply #113 on: June 09, 2018, 04:14:19 PM »
It is Archbishop Lefebvre himself explaining he often uses hyperbole to make a point.  Only dunces like you try to make him literal:

If he did, then it's incredibly irresponsible of him to be so imprecise when people's souls are on the line.

or, rather,

SJ = BS.

+Lefebvre's position and his rhetoric changed over the years, depending on whether or not he FELT closer to Rome or more alienated by Rome.  So, in this sense, the Archbishop was not consistent and this was a failure on his part.

Re: Rule Violator #2: JPaul
« Reply #114 on: June 09, 2018, 04:15:05 PM »
That makes sense, otherwise one could argue a priest would confer the sacrament by merely performing, "This is My Body", without the rest of the rite.
...as was often done in the gulags behind the iron curtain (though the wine was also consecrated).