Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Rule Violator #2: JPaul  (Read 21130 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Rule Violator #2: JPaul
« Reply #5 on: June 04, 2018, 11:22:28 AM »
Logic is not your strength, SeanJohnson.

Just because you say that the NOM might be valid doesn't mean you consider it good and Catholic.

Just because you say that some people can attend it under certain circuмstances (basing it on the moral theology regarding material participation) doesn't mean you consider it OBJECTiVELY good and Catholic.

Both +Lefebvre and +Williamson clearly consider the NOM defective/bad/non-Catholic.
Duh...
Pretty sure you are familiar with my published work making those same arguments (but then reading comprehension is often an impediment to partisanship, and must frequently yield to it).

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Rule Violator #2: JPaul
« Reply #6 on: June 04, 2018, 11:23:56 AM »


Re: Rule Violator #2: JPaul
« Reply #7 on: June 04, 2018, 11:25:27 AM »

More psychological projection of your own undesirable traits to others.

Re: Rule Violator #2: JPaul
« Reply #8 on: June 04, 2018, 11:31:40 AM »
Translation (a la Jaynek):

“Please quit responding; he’s already got two of us!”

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Rule Violator #2: JPaul
« Reply #9 on: June 04, 2018, 12:37:16 PM »
Translation (a la Jaynek):

“Please quit responding; he’s already got two of us!”

I don't care what you think you have.  I'm just bored with you and choose to no longer entertain you.  If Matthew wants to ban me, he's already got plenty of grounds and ammunition.  Your trolling posts add nothing.

:sleep: