Question: Why can the SSPX not condemn the traitor agreement with Communist China?
Answer: As Rome was able to make an agreement with the Communists; so too, it will be able to make an agreement with traditionalists.
Source: (translated from Spanish by Google -- go to origin to see Spanish version) http://translate.google.com/translate?u=https%3A%2F%2Fnonpossumus-vcr.blogspot.com%2F2018%2F10%2Fincreible-la-neo-fsspx-publica-articulo.html&langpair=auto%7Cen&hl=en
INCREDIBLE: THE NEO-FSSPX PUBLISHES NEUTRAL ARTICLE ON THE TRAITOR AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE VATICAN AND THE CHILEAN [Chinese?] COMMUNIST TYRANNY.
"IT'S STILL TOO SOON TO MAKE A DEFINITIVE JUDGMENT"
THE FSSPX COMMITTED FOR THE FIRST TIME ON THE RECENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN COMMUNIST CHINA AND ROME FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF BISHOPS, AND IT MAKES IT - AS A CUSTOMER - THROUGH A NEUTRAL ARTICLE AND "POLITICALLY CORRECT" IN WHICH THE FRATERNITY IS LIMITED TO NARRATING FACTS, Citing THIRD PARTIES, AND FORMULATING THE QUESTION "END OF A [SCHISM] OR SURRENDER?" WITHOUT WANTING TO GIVE THE ANSWER.
HOW IS THIS EXPLAINED? SIMPLE: BECAUSE THE FOLLOWING "PASTORAL AGREEMENT TO END A SCHISM" WILL BE WITH THE FRATERNITY, OR AT LEAST THAT IS WHAT THE FSSPX NOTORILY EXPECTS FROM 2012. THE ONE THAT CAN [do?] THE MOST, WITH GREATER REASON CAN [do?] THE LESS : YES ROMA WAS ABLE TO MAKE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE COMMUNISTS, IT WILL ALSO BE ABLE TO MAKE AN AGREEMENT WITH TRADITIONALISTS. THAT IS WHY THE FSSPX CAN NOT CONDEMN THE TRAITOR AGREEMENT WITH COMMUNIST CHINA.
IT IS CHECKED ONCE AGAIN THAT THE AUTHORITIES OF THE FRATERNITY KEEP THE NEW ORDER OF PRIORITIES INHERITED FROM MONS. FELLAY ACCORDING TO RECENT WORDS OF MONS. WILLIAMSON IN FRANCE, THIS IS THE ORDER OF PRIORITIES OF THE NEO-FSSPX:
1 ° THE AGREEMENT WITH ROME.
2 ° THE UNIT OF THE FSSPX.
3 ° FAITH
CHINA: END OF A SCHISM OR SURRENDER?
[NP = nonpossumus-vcr.blogspot.com]
On September 22, 2018, a modus vivendi was established between the Holy See and the People's Republic of China, regarding the appointment of bishops, in order to put an end to a schism of almost seventy years . [!] [The FSSPX begins its article without making any criticism of the official version of the facts]
" The objective of the agreement is not political but pastoral , allowing the faithful to have bishops in communion with Rome, but at the same time recognized by the Chinese authorities," said Greg Burke, Director of the Press Office of the Holy See, on October 22. September. [Wonderful! In other words: nothing to worry about: this agreement between the Church of Christ and the satanic Communist Party is only pastoral . Francis found a way to peacefully unite Christ with Belial. Cool!]
The Secretary of State of the Holy See, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, insisted on the importance of an agreement that he considers historic : "for the first time in so many decades, today all Chinese bishops are in communion with the Bishop of Rome ." [!]
[Now some "buts" to this great news]
However, several issues remain unresolved, including the " synization " of the religions that the totalitarian communist regime of Xi Jinping wants to achieve.
The term "sinization" can cover many realities, and many Catholics of the clandestine Church, who have remained, against all odds, loyal to Rome, fear that this provisional agreement will lead the Party to take control of a Church emptied of its spiritual content. to become a kind of association.
The most notable criticism came from Cardinal Joseph Zen: the prelate, over 86 years old, was a bishop of Hong Kong. He retired almost 10 years ago. Card. Zen has become known in the media for its principled opposition to any rapprochement between the Church and the Chinese regime. On September 22 he denounced an agreement that, according to him, is nothing more than a "masterpiece of creativity that says nothing in many words", especially since everything is secret. It thus summarizes the message of Pope Francis to the Chinese faithful: all they have to do is obey their government, which can now "presume to have the agreement of the Vatican"!
The Chinese prelate does not give in: the agreement consists, in fact, in "a betrayal and an unconditional surrender that precipitates the flock in the mouth of the wolf".
Pope Francis responded to the criticism of the Zen Bishop three days later, on September 25, on the plane that brought him from his apostolic trip to the Baltic States. The Cardinal Secretary of State - he explained - "studied all the documents until the last comma", which for the Holy Father is the guarantee of "a very great security". In any case, "it is the Pope who will appoint [the bishops in China] [from among those proposed by the Communist Party!] It will be me: the thing is clear," said Francisco.
Although it is still too early to make a definitive judgment, [According to the Neo-FSSPX, then, the position of Card. Zen must be dismissed as hasty] it is time to pray that Chinese Catholics may one day exercise their religion freely, without suffering the vexations and persecutions of the omnipresent Communist Party.