Catholic Info

Traditional Catholic Faith => SSPX Resistance News => Topic started by: dreamtomorrow on April 27, 2014, 11:34:11 AM

Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: dreamtomorrow on April 27, 2014, 11:34:11 AM
This weekend I attended a random conference B. Fellay was having at the new seminary in Dillwyn VA. I went to see if he would comment on the false canonizations and whether he would address the "rumors"/resistance. I tried to have an open mind and listen to what he had to say with no bias. Initial reaction when arriving-"Where is everyone?" Maybe 200 but not quite 300 people. There were two tents one for the Mass and the other for the dinner. To my surprise everything was free. They had regular porta-potties and then a few super fancy porta potties (flushed, sink, large mirror, seat cover--the works!  
There was no special occasion for the conference, it was simply because. The topic for the conference was not announced, I asked around beforehand, no one knew.
The sermon included (my notes are mainly paraphrased or excerpts of things I thought important):
~God is with us always, it is only through Him that things happen and we should be grateful. (Possibly leading towards if an agreement happens it is thanks to God and it was meant to happen because He willed it).
~Easter is a time of resurrection and we see something (what?) rising out of the Earth, everything comes from His hands, these buildings coming out of the Earth (seminary). This building is like a sign (of good things to come?) it will be here long after we are gone for future generations, it ensures/makes more sure our (SSPX's) survival.
~The Church is infected with a virus and it is killing the Church, mentions loss of faith, 7,000 churches being torn down in Europe, only 1 priest ordained in the diocese of Rome last year. 1 priest may be responsible for 60 churches.
~He criticized the council a lot and especially Pope Francis regarding good people can be saved.
~"There is something deeply wrong with a church who is pleasing to the world"--person of the year pope, etc.
"If you want your children to lose their Faith, send them to my schools"--Pope Francis.
~exPope Benedict "There is nothing wrong with tradition; what past popes said regarding tradition is good for the time it was said, things have changed"
~The Church complains that the world (I guess meaning modernism or corruption) is everywhere and B. Fellay says the remedy is simple, come back! But they do not want.
~He repeated again his quote about the two cannonizations that "we deeply deeply protest. Through these the church will lose credibility."

After dinner the conference was held
He began by saying the conference was going to touch on the stages of the Church and he wanted to address the "false rumors" that have been spreading. I got excited because I thought he was going to address the main ones with proof of why they are untrue, as you will see, that was not the case.

He began with declining stages of the church which has been visited over and over so I did not find that noteworthy.
Then he commented on the evils of the internet
~On the internet there is no authority (who would be an authority there? If there was would there be censorship?) Everyone has an opinion to share. (Isn't that a good thing? We are not supposed to be clones or mimic each other)
~Multiply sins by spreading rumors (I'm not sure whether that was exact quote but then he gave example of a girl who confessed spreading a rumor and her confessor counselled her by saying that it was like spreading a handful of feathers to the wind and in order to be redeemed she had to retrieve the feathers which is impossible.
~God doesn't need the internet, Padre Pio did not need the internet.
~Where are the priests (N.O. priests) leading the people?
~The Pope is not a man of doctrine, he is a man of practice.
~Korah: if you recognize Jesus as Our Lord it is a blasphemy. Pope Francis invites Muslims to pray.
~ABL said Do you accept this, this, and this, if no then we cannot have agreement (that famous quanta cura quote I didn't write down because I have it noted elsewhere). But when B. Fellay approached them they said of course we accept! At the end they asked us (B. Fellay and his helpers) to help them (Rome) overcome the contradictions.
~There will be no agreement, only a continuing of tolerance to most things by the Vatican.
~N.O. Cardinal says don't make an agreement, stay as you are, Vatican II needs you! (Then why couldn't SSPX priests say that freely?)

I asked him the last point after the conference (there was no Q and A session) Bishop responded that the priests were not expelled for being against agreement. They all had different problems for which they were punished for (maybe disobedience?) but there are no public statements for why the priests were expelled because the laity love/d them and if they publicized why they were expelled then the people may be angry or scandalized. And I asked but why so many at once? He said it is not so many, I counted last time and it was maybe 20.

Sigh. Sooo Fr. Pheiffer had been a Society priest for 17 years (I think) and his faults are just now getting him expelled? Some of the others expelled were Society priests even longer.

After conference there were tours around the seminary. It is very large, expensive looking, and during the tour the seminarian who was leading the tour explained there would be a vineyard, brewery, book restoration room, three stories to the building, recreation areas, pool table/fooseball (maybe he was joking),cattle, platform built for the ordinations tent, camping area for when people visit for ordinations with a shower and restroom building. I do NOT see where they are getting the money. The Society has families with large numbers of children and only a small percent are wealthy...how are they getting so much money for all of these plans? Maybe it would be better to offer young men who want to be priests a free ride for their studies and increase vocations that way with limited amenities and suffering without a fancy brewery in their kitchen.

I did record both the sermon and the conference, trying to fix the audio right now (we got front row seats, but it was in open area so sound has a lot of "air" noise).
If anyone else from here attended and had a different opinion of the sermon/conference or has anything to add please do so. God bless!
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: holysoulsacademy on April 27, 2014, 12:13:43 PM
Thank you dreamtomorrow!  Looking forward to that post!
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: 1st Mansion Tenant on April 27, 2014, 02:59:23 PM
Quote from: holysoulsacademy
Thank you dreamtomorrow!  Looking forward to that post!


Why would anybody down-thumb you for saying you were looking forward to reading the post? Somebody has issues...
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: hugeman on April 27, 2014, 04:11:31 PM
Nice job, dreamtomorrow! Thank you. We'll wait for the audio! God Bless You.
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: Matthew on April 27, 2014, 05:02:00 PM
Thank you for your report. It sounds objective and impartial.

We need more objective "reporters" like you, with boots on the ground. Posts like this is exactly why CathInfo exists -- to inform the THOUSANDS of other Catholics who couldn't make it to such an event (myself included).

The whole experience, as you describe it, is exactly what I would have expected.
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: AlligatorDicax on April 27, 2014, 10:37:06 PM
Quote from: dreamtomorrow (Apr 27, 2014, 12:34 pm)
This weekend I attended a random conference B. Fellay was having at the new seminary in Dillwyn VA.

I lived for a while in Northern Virginia, so being provided with a specific place-name by the original poster, I couldn't resist looking up the locale (thus learning that my original impressions were mistaken).
Quote from: dreamtomorrow (Apr 27, 2014, continued)
After conference there were tours around the seminary.  It is very large, expensive looking, and during the tour the seminarian who was leading the tour explained there would be a vineyard, brewery, book restoration room, three stories to the building, recreation areas, pool table/fooseball [...],cattle, platform built for the ordinations tent, camping area for when people visit for ordinations with a shower and restroom building. I do NOT see where they are getting the money.  The Society has families with large numbers of children and only a small percent are wealthy ... how are they getting so much money for all of these plans?  Maybe it would be better to offer young men who want to be priests a free ride for their studies and increase vocations that way with limited amenities and suffering without a fancy brewery in their kitchen.

Perhaps there's a business plan that shows that a "seminary brewery" and "seminary vintages" would carry enough snob appeal to generate modest profits, especially among affluent tourists driving a few hours 

The brewery and vineyard might be even more marketable if they could arrange for Commonwealth-of-Virginia law to allow them to to call themselves an "abbey", and label its ales, beer, and wine accordingly.  Either way, a fundamental selling point would be promoting its products as exemplifying the "traditional" brewers' or vintners' art.

If profits were not simply handed over to Menzingen, they might assist in supporting the seminary.

Note *: To Dillwyn (Buckingham Co.): perhaps via U.S. 15, S. of the James River, but N. of the Appomattox River, 1_1/2 mi. (more or less) short of U.S. 60.  The town is due W. of Richmond, not quite due S. of Charlottesville (Albemarle Co.).
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: AJNC on April 28, 2014, 01:08:47 AM
Bishop Fellay while mentioning the paucity of priests/vocations in Europe,did not give figures for church attendance. Is it not true that only about 5% of baptized Catholics in Europe go to church? Does this minimal figure of attendees need a full complement of priests or is it not a question of reallocating priestly resources.
BF could be talking about this priestly shortage with a view to alleviating it with his band of 500 priests. His 500 is a drop in the ocean. Pope Bergoglio could end the shortage overnight by allowing  married and women clergy.
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: wallflower on April 28, 2014, 08:24:15 AM


I am a little torn on this issue. Problems with the direction of the SSPX aside, when it comes to the size and grandeur of the new seminary I try to remind myself of the Middle Ages when they built magnificent cathedrals yet many lived in poverty themselves. The Protestants like to point the finger at how "selfish and inhumanitarian" that is yet the Catholic perspective is to give glory to God first and the rest will follow. Like Abel we offer Him our best first and we worry not for ourselves. Is God so limited that now because there's a large seminary, He cannot provide for the rest of us? There's a bit of a Communist or perhaps simply envious streak in us that wants that wealth to be more "evenly" distributed. Think of what they could do if they just put that money towards the poor people! etc... I want to fight that tendency and won't give in to criticizing the new building for that reason.  

My trouble is that I hope that Catholic perspective is what the leaders of the SSPX have in mind in building this seminary and that it isn't tinged by a search for earthly praise and glory. The opulence of the seminary doesn't matter to me so much as the motivation behind it. Of course this is something I cannot truly know from where I am so it doesn't behoove me to worry. I still do a little bit.

 





 
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: ultrarigorist on April 28, 2014, 08:56:05 AM
It's a gilded cage for true vocations.
The concept is not without precedent in at least 1 S.P. community.
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: Matthew on April 28, 2014, 10:06:30 AM
Quote from: wallflower


I am a little torn on this issue. Problems with the direction of the SSPX aside, when it comes to the size and grandeur of the new seminary I try to remind myself of the Middle Ages when they built magnificent cathedrals yet many lived in poverty themselves. The Protestants like to point the finger at how "selfish and inhumanitarian" that is yet the Catholic perspective is to give glory to God first and the rest will follow. Like Abel we offer Him our best first and we worry not for ourselves. Is God so limited that now because there's a large seminary, He cannot provide for the rest of us? There's a bit of a Communist or perhaps simply envious streak in us that wants that wealth to be more "evenly" distributed. Think of what they could do if they just put that money towards the poor people! etc... I want to fight that tendency and won't give in to criticizing the new building for that reason.  

My trouble is that I hope that Catholic perspective is what the leaders of the SSPX have in mind in building this seminary and that it isn't tinged by a search for earthly praise and glory. The opulence of the seminary doesn't matter to me so much as the motivation behind it. Of course this is something I cannot truly know from where I am so it doesn't behoove me to worry. I still do a little bit.


I won't be giving in to that communist-inspired, iconoclastic knee-jerk either.

However, I think it's valid to call them "monument-builders". They shouldn't be building monuments in a time of crisis like this, when so many Trad Catholics don't even have a place to attend Mass. That money could be used to pay for more SSPX priest plane tickets, and the building of hundreds of smaller, more basic chapels.

Here is the main difference: We're in a crisis. Before the Crisis in the Church, the Catholic Church provided for *all* its members. Sure, some large cities had nice cathedrals because they had more resources and people, but that didn't stop poor, small groups of Catholics from having access to the Mass.

Today, there is no welfare or safety net for spiritually-disadvantaged Traditional Catholics who happen to live in the wrong places. If the SSPX doesn't build a chapel and send a priest, those people are simply out of luck.

I guess you might say poverty is one thing, but spiritual desolation is another thing altogether. Each one of us needs the graces of the Mass and the priesthood -- but we don't need material splendor.

The whole point of Tradition is to pull back from what is doubtful (the N.O.) and stick to what is certain (Traditional doctrine, Liturgy, books, catechisms, hymns, etc.).

Why doesn't the SSPX write new traditional-sounding hymns?

We can't move on and create new culture and expressions of culture. We're in a CRISIS -- which necessitates a LIFEBOAT. Nothing more. It's not our job to "move on" from Rome. That would be wrong.

By constructing large Gothic churches, monumental seminaries, and other things along these lines, we give the impression that the Crisis is over. But it's not over. The fight continues. That's the problem with the Neo-SSPX today; they act as if we can drop our guard.

It's easier to remember we're in a Crisis when you're hearing Mass in a hotel room or garage/workshop. Or at least in a humble building of some sort -- not a $5M building that looks exactly like a pre-Vatican2 church.
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: wallflower on April 28, 2014, 03:03:36 PM

Thank you Matthew! That's the link I was missing, the difference between material and spiritual poverty. That makes sense to me.  

They would likely argue that in providing a seminary large enough to house so many seminarians, they ARE providing for spiritual needs in the long run. But it seems debatable. It seems as though there are many extras that could wait until a more stable time.



Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: AlligatorDicax on April 28, 2014, 04:30:09 PM
Quote from: Matthew (April 28, 2014, 11:06 am)
They shouldn't be building monuments in a time of crisis like this, when so many Trad Catholics don't even have a place to attend Mass.  That money could be used to pay for more SSPX priest plane tickets, and the building of hundreds of smaller, more basic chapels.  Here is the main difference: We're in a crisis. [....] It's easier to remember we're in a Crisis when you're hearing Mass in a hotel room or garage/workshop.  Or at least in a humble building of some sort--not a $5M [$5,000,000] building that looks exactly like a pre-Vatican2 church.

I wanted to submit a reply in this topic, about what 1 traditional group of lay Catholics 
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: Matto on April 28, 2014, 04:32:24 PM
I think it would have been smarter to give the money to different SSPX chapels around the world than to spend so much money on one site. I know my chapel could use some extra spending money.
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: claudel on April 28, 2014, 05:55:05 PM
Quote from: AlligatorDicax
Calling the laity of that chapel a "congregation" just looks too Protestant or secular to my cradle-Catholic eyes, but I suppose it's possible that I'm overly scrupulous about religious terminology.


As a fellow cradle Catholic, may I suggest that the possibility you hint at might be well grounded. Congregation need not be seen as a sectarian term, not in American English at any rate. It's quite as neutral as flock (the Latin root of congregation is "grex," a flock) and, alas, infinitely more sensible nowadays than parishioner, unless one is prepared to stretch the very notion of parish to what seems to me the breaking point.

As for secularness, I wish you were right. I'd do metaphorical handstands of delight were I to see the mass media refer to Obama voters and the Jєωιѕн and ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ lobbies as congregations. Heaven knows they all baa on cue!
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: Ekim on April 28, 2014, 07:42:30 PM
Immaculate Conception mission in Virginia Beach has been meeting in a hotelfor over q15 years now, even after they gave the SSPX 4acres of land with the promise that someday they would have a chapel.  At the time of purchase the land was valued at approximately $275K.  This value has increased significantly since then, but still no Chapel.  The Mission has since lost many families to the new and beautiful St. Benedict's operated by the Fraternity of St. Peter.

These poor folks deserve a Chapel of their own, or at least a full refund of their money.
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: Ekim on April 28, 2014, 07:48:47 PM
Also interesting to note, had the SSPX built the Chapel back in 1999, St. Benedict's would probably had fizzled out. At the time, the SSPX was far better attended.
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: LKCTexas on April 28, 2014, 08:39:23 PM
I certainly may be wrong - the timing of the new seminary seems to me a similar pattern when FSSP received its new Denton, Nebraska seminary.  It was shortly after the former SSPX priest Fr. Bisig (then the superior of FSSP) was forced out around 2000 and replaced with one of Rome's liking.  The new seminary project arrived seemingly with no strings attached about that time.  I remember it was a time I was moving away from N.O. and beginning to attend the Indult Mass and was excited to see FSSP with the new Nebraska seminary, later learning more about the history of FSSP and the truth through Archbishop Lefebvre's leadership and traditional spirituality.  What the Society seems to have received is a similar packaged deal, including resources to build the Virginia seminary. Maybe others with more recollection what happened to FSSP and the arrival of the Nebraska seminary can shed more on this.  Is there a made in Germany pattern or parallel here?

Fr. Bisig - disagreed with ABL on method of preserving Tradition by keeping distance from Rome and through the consecration of bishops.
Fr. Pfluger - disagrees with ABL on the method of preserving Tradition by keeping distance from Rome, facilitating the dismissal of the one bishop defending ABL's position, and seeking to be regularized with Rome.
The then Cardinal Ratzinger - provided the means for FSSP to locate a new seminary in Germany.

Sources:
http://www.fssp.org/en/presentation.htm

http://veneremurcernui.wordpress.com/2013/07/19/congratulations-to-the-fssp/

http://www.ncregister.com/site/article/priestly-fraternity-of-st.-peter-turns-25

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Lady_of_Guadalupe_Seminary

Our Lady of Victory, pray for us!
In the end My Immaculate Heart will Triumph!
Patrick Coon
Georgetown, Tx
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: holysoulsacademy on April 29, 2014, 12:46:58 AM
Quote from: LKCTexas


Fr. Bisig - disagreed with ABL on method of preserving Tradition by keeping distance from Rome and through the consecration of bishops.
Fr. Pfluger - disagrees with ABL on the method of preserving Tradition by keeping distance from Rome, facilitating the dismissal of the one bishop defending ABL's position, and seeking to be regularized with Rome.
The then Cardinal Ratzinger - provided the means for FSSP to locate a new seminary in Germany.

Our Lady of Victory, pray for us!
In the end My Immaculate Heart will Triumph!
Patrick Coon
Georgetown, Tx



Quote from: LKCTexas
Sources:
http://www.fssp.org/en/presentation.htm


What are we? The Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter
Origin of the Fraternity

The Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter is a Clerical Society of Apostolic Life of Pontifical right, that is, a community of Roman Catholic priests who do not take religious vows, but who work together for a common mission in the world.  The mission of the Fraternity is two-fold:  first, the formation and sanctification of priests in the cadre of the traditional liturgy of the Roman rite, and secondly, the pastoral deployment of the priests in the service of the Church.

The Fraternity was founded on July 18, 1988 at the Abbey of Hauterive (Switzerland) by a dozen priests and a score of seminarians.  Shortly after the Fraternity’s foundation and following upon a request by Cardinal Ratzinger, Bishop Joseph Stimpfle of Augsburg, Germany granted the Fraternity a home in Wigratzbad, a Marian shrine in Bavaria that now lodges the Fraternity’s European seminary. In the same month of October there arrived a handful of priests and some thirty seminarians ready to start "from scratch".  There are currently almost 200 priests and 110 seminarians in the Fraternity.
Priestly Formation in the Fraternity

The Fraternity of St. Peter currently operates two international houses of formation: the original formation house in Wigratzbad, Germany (diocese of Augsburg), and the other in Denton, Nebraska, U.S.A. (diocese of Lincoln).  The Fraternity has organized its seminary training in accordance with the Church’s norms on priestly formation, including a year of more intense spiritual preparation before entering the cycles of philosophy and theology.  By fostering a balanced life of prayer, study, community life, and personal discipline, care is taken to foster human maturity and to acquire the spirit of the Gospel, in close union with Christ.  The spiritual life in the houses is centered on the sacrifice of the Mass.  Special attention is paid to the faithful observance of the "liturgical and spiritual traditions" according to the dispositions of the Motu proprio Ecclesia Dei adflicta of July 2, 1988, which is at the origin of the Fraternity’s foundation (Constitutions, Art. 8).
Pastoral Mission of Fraternity Priests

Once the formation progamme has been completed, the Fraternity’s priests serve the faithful – under the direction of their bishop and within the terms of the Fraternity’s own constitutions – in its various apostolates in France, Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Italy, the USA, Australia, Canada, Great Britain and Nigeria.  In the world, the priests of the Fraternity live in small communities and work to spread the Gospel by means of preaching, catechesis, youth education (scout troops, schools), and organizing pilgrimages and retreats, etc.  With the full approval of the Holy See and the permission of local bishops, the priests provide a full sacramental life for the faithful, administered according to the liturgical books of 1962.

Quote from: LKCTexas
http://veneremurcernui.wordpress.com/2013/07/19/congratulations-to-the-fssp/


Congratulations to the FSSP! July 19, 2013
Posted by tantamergo

Today is the 25th anniversary of the formal founding of the Priestly Fraternity of St Peter-  Fraternetie Sacerdotalis Sancte Petri! Yay!

On June 30, 1988, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, the leader of the Society of St. Pius X, and his associate, Bishop Antonio de Castro Meyer, consecrated four bishops in defiance of the wishes of Pope John Paul II.

While Archbishop Lefebvre’s desire to preserve the traditional Latin Mass amidst the onslaught of liturgical abuses was shared by Father Josef Bisig, an SSPX priest at the time, there was sharp disagreement on the method of preservation. Father Bisig did not think acting against a papal command was the right way to bring this about.

Two days after the illicit consecrations, Father Bisig, a native of Switzerland, along with 11 other priests and about 20 seminarians, announced their departure from the SSPX. They wanted to continue their adherence to the traditional Latin liturgy, but not outside the realm of obedience to the Holy Father.

In their Declaration of Intention by the Founders, dated July 2, 1988, the former members of the SSPX stated their “profound regret over the illicit consecration of bishops” and also made clear their goal: to live as a religious society in the Catholic Church and to place themselves at its service, under the authority of the pope.

This goal was made possible on July 18, 1988, when the former SSPX members founded the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter (FSSP) with the strong support of the then-president of the pontifical commission Ecclesia Dei, Cardinal Paul Mayer.

Exactly three months later, on Oct. 18, 1988, the same commission, with the explicit approval of Blessed Pope John Paul II, established the FSSP as a society of apostolic life. The group’s name was chosen to express filial devotion to the successor of Peter, the rock on whom the Church is built.

Father Bisig was the FSSP’s first superior general, a position he held until 2000.  [Until he was forced out by the Vatican.  FSSP has not had an entirely smooth 25 year history.  It's sort of a long story.  There was also an expectation that the FSSP would be headed by a bishop promoted from their ranks; that also, has not occurred.]   During his tenure, he continually made clear the importance of remaining true to liturgical traditions, while at the same time being obedient to ecclesiastical authority. [I think it safe to say that Fr. Bissig has suffered for that obedience. God bless him.]

“The Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter serves the faithful by retaining Latin liturgical traditions, the Church’s source of continuity. This is done, not out of nostalgia or a reactionary disposition, but out of humility,” Father Bisig told the Register. “At the same time, we are called to live joyfully under the paternal authority of the successor of St. Peter. This is done out of humility as well.”

Quote from: LKCTexas
http://www.ncregister.com/site/article/priestly-fraternity-of-st.-peter-turns-25


Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter Turns 25
Group Celebrates Fidelity to Liturgical Traditions and the Pope

by Trent Beattie, Register Correspondent
Wednesday, Oct 02, 2013 3:39 PM

On June 30, 1988, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, the leader of the Society of St. Pius X, and his associate, Bishop Antonio de Castro Meyer, consecrated four bishops in defiance of the wishes of Pope John Paul II.

While Archbishop Lefebvre’s desire to preserve the traditional Latin Mass amidst the onslaught of liturgical abuses was shared by Father Josef Bisig, an SSPX priest at the time, there was sharp disagreement on the method of preservation. Father Bisig did not think acting against a papal command was the right way to bring this about.

Two days after the illicit consecrations, Father Bisig, a native of Switzerland, along with 11 other priests and about 20 seminarians, announced their departure from the SSPX. They wanted to continue their adherence to celebrating the Mass in Latin, but not outside the realm of obedience to the Holy Father.

In their "Declaration of Intention by the Founders," dated July 2, 1988, the former members of the SSPX stated their "profound regret over the illicit consecration of bishops" and also made clear their goal: to live as a religious society in the Catholic Church and to place themselves at its service, under the authority of the Pope.

This goal was made possible on July 18, 1988, when the former SSPX members founded the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter (FSSP), with the strong support of the then-president of the pontifical commission Ecclesia Dei, Cardinal Paul Mayer.

Exactly three months later, on Oct. 18, 1988, the same commission, with the explicit approval of Blessed Pope John Paul II, established the FSSP as a society of apostolic life. The group’s name was chosen to express filial devotion to the successor of Peter, the rock on whom the Church is built.

Father Bisig was the FSSP’s first superior general, a position he held until 2000. During his tenure, he continually made clear the importance of remaining true to liturgical traditions, while at the same time being obedient to ecclesiastical authority.

"The Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter serves the faithful by retaining Latin liturgical traditions, the Church’s source of continuity. This is done, not out of nostalgia or a reactionary disposition, but out of humility," Father Bisig told the Register. "At the same time, we are called to live joyfully under the paternal authority of the successor of St. Peter. This is done out of humility as well."

Remaining Faithful

The FSSP’s current superior general, Father John Berg, a Minnesota native, is thankful to God for how the fraternity has developed over the past quarter century. Despite some growing pains, Father Berg believes the fraternity has remained faithful to its founding principles while finding the best concrete ways to serve the Church.

"We’ve gone from a handful of priests and seminarians to 240 priests and 140 seminarians worldwide," Father Berg noted. "The numbers are good, so you have to be thankful for them. More important than numbers, though, is the retention of our original identity while serving the lay faithful on a day-to-day basis."

The chief pastoral work of the FSSP is offering the sacraments in the traditional form in parishes across Europe and North America. From Vancouver, B.C., to Sarasota, Fla., the fraternity has more than 50 locations where Masses are offered. In order to do this, priests are trained at Our Lady of Guadalupe Seminary in Denton, Neb., the heart of FSSP’s North American territory.

In addition to offering the traditional Latin Mass themselves, FSSP priests also train their diocesan counterparts to do the same. While the celebration of the Mass in Latin is the hallmark of the fraternity, its priests also conduct retreats, lead pilgrimages and travel on mission trips to Asia, Africa and South America.

Father Berg believes the biggest challenge facing the FSSP today is the formation of excellent priests. "I suppose each generation thinks that this is an even greater challenge than it was for the one before it, but we need to form men who want to live a life of self-sacrifice," he said. "This is done in imitation of Christ, in whose priesthood they share."

Family Fraternity

The FSSP founders set out to form priests who would hold the sacrifice of the Mass at the center of their lives, which would make each priest’s life an extension of the life of Christ.

It could be said, then, that Arizona native Sean Gordon has a very "extended family." He enjoys the unique perspective that comes from having three brothers who are FSSP priests. Father James Gordon and Father Terrence Gordon are older than Sean, 40, while Father Dennis Gordon is younger.

"Having three brothers in the priesthood can be attributed mainly to the influence of our father," Sean Gordon said. "After attending Mass every Sunday, he would teach us a lesson from the Baltimore Catechism. Then he would quiz us to make sure we were retaining the lessons. The simplicity of the lessons was very helpful for us. There was no room for confusion about what the Church taught."

The Gordon children also benefited from their father’s prayer life. They saw him kneeling down to pray, not only at night, but at different times throughout the day. That sent a very clear message about the importance of prayer: It’s not something to reserve for special occasions, but a lifeline that enables us to receive God’s grace and do his will.

Sound doctrine and a strong prayer life were accompanied by praise for the traditional Latin liturgy in the Gordon home. Sean Gordon explained, "Even though we didn’t have access to the traditional Latin Mass growing up, our father would always speak highly of it. He thought its beauty and sacredness were very appealing and salutary, and we were eventually able to witness what he was talking about firsthand."

All three of Gordon’s brothers became FSSP priests after serving in the military, and he considered a priestly or religious vocation too. Although a call to married life instead became apparent, he would encourage any Catholic young man discerning a possible priestly vocation to do so with the FSSP.

"I found the fraternity to have the most straightforward program for priestly formation of any of the groups I considered. Their goals were very clear and thoroughly Catholic, reminding me of the Catholic principles taught to me in my own upbringing. I would absolutely recommend that any young man discerning a possible call to priesthood look into the FSSP."

‘Act of Hope’

Father Bisig says the FSSP will remain on the same path of fidelity and unity to Rome that its members chose to follow a quarter century ago.

"The fraternity was founded on an act of hope in a time of confusion and disunity," he said. "Now, 25 years later, with continued confidence, we place our needs in the hands of the Blessed Virgin Mary, who, with St. Peter, has guided and protected us this far."

Trent Beattie writes from Seattle.

Quote from: LKCTexas
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Lady_of_Guadalupe_Seminary


Our Lady of Guadalupe Seminary
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Our Lady of Guadalupe Seminary is the second seminary of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter, a Society of Apostolic Life in the Catholic Church.

The seminary was canonically established in 1988 by Pope John Paul II in accordance with his letter Ecclesia Dei adflicta and opened in 2000. Located in Denton, Nebraska, near Lincoln, it was founded primarily to serve English-speaking seminarians for the Fraternity from North America and to provide traditionalist Catholic education. Nonetheless, the customal of the seminary includes a provision for students who are not members of the Fraternity but are studying for the priesthood in other ecclesiastical organizations, and since 2008 the seminary has served as the location of philosophical and theological education for clerical members of the Sons of the Most Holy Redeemer.

Seminarians are future Catholic priests who receive training in the ancient Tridentine liturgy as it existed in 1962, prior to and during the Second Vatican Council; Gregorian chant is also an integral part of the education. The seminary offers at least one formal vocational retreat annually for those interested in considering priesthood. Admission is limited to males, in accordance with the Catholic understanding of the priesthood.

The first phase of the seminary complex was designed by Thomas Gordon Smith Architects in a Romanesque style and completed in 2000. Seminarians live in the dormitory wing.

The current rector is Fr. Josef Bisig, F.S.S.P.
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: Elizabeth on April 29, 2014, 08:42:51 AM
Quote from: Ekim
Immaculate Conception mission in Virginia Beach has been meeting in a hotelfor over q15 years now, even after they gave the SSPX 4acres of land with the promise that someday they would have a chapel.  At the time of purchase the land was valued at approximately $275K.  This value has increased significantly since then, but still no Chapel.  The Mission has since lost many families to the new and beautiful St. Benedict's operated by the Fraternity of St. Peter.

These poor folks deserve a Chapel of their own, or at least a full refund of their money.


I might be mistaken, but I had been under the impression that the Count and only a few very kind and generous families had been bankrolling OLoF.  
 
 I do feel certain that the money was given purely for the love of Christ. I seriously doubt that any of the benefactors would ask for a refund of their money, but I could be wrong.

 They ran into some glitches when the independent priest died and left the chapel in financial disarray. No funds for a Requiem, $!0,000 to have his body returned to the family, etc. etc.  (a very holy man, but apparently had not made plans nor repairs) Like many, they had to ask the SSPX for help and Bp. Williamson did Father's Requiem.  

I think the situation is complicated.  OLoF was one of the first independent chapels, so many of the dear founding souls have passed away, there have been boards of directors and numerous changes, mistakes in management--trusting the wrong people sometimes. Perhaps not enough young people with money to keep  things afloat.  This is a sign of the times, that such a holy chapel with such good Catholics is falling on hard times.  I pray the good Catholics in Virginia Beach get the chapel they deserve!

EDIT:  Dera Ekim, I re-read your post and see that you are talking about Va Beach, not OLoF--sorry to go off on a tangent!
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: Elizabeth on April 29, 2014, 08:49:13 AM
Quote from: AlligatorDicax

I lived for a while in Northern Virginia, so being provided with a specific place-name by the original poster, I couldn't resist looking up the locale (thus learning that my original impressions were mistaken).


.


At one point, people were claiming the new seminary would be adjacent to the DC "corridors of power".  It's out in the middle of nowhere, really.  
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: ultrarigorist on April 29, 2014, 09:10:59 AM
Quote from: holysoulsacademy
{wordy glossy about FSSP}


Something that has become apparent about FSSP is that while their newest apostolates look just like SSPX and Independent (as least SSPX from a few years ago), their oldest chapels/apostolates are beginning to show the weaknesses in their "position". Immodesty was creeping in, mantillas were becoming more the exception than norm, and most of their kids are being lost to the faith.
I suppose it's like anything else. They receive a moral or spiritual inheritance (as laity from SSPX), and then once that is spent, what follows are solely fruits of their chaplain's labors.
So maybe the acid test is one generation for the fruits to be really manifest, because within the first generation, the influence of parents is predominately visible.
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: 1st Mansion Tenant on April 29, 2014, 10:45:08 AM
The seminary is to be a shiny bit of bling on a silver platter for +F to present to the Pope when he cinches the Deal- It will fold nicely into Rome's plans to  suck(er) in the SSPX with the promise of a Personal Prelature after a time of Formal "Tolerance". The "Tolerance" gambit is to lull the old-timers who still remember ABL, and give time for a slow immersion in the cooking pot so too many don't come out of their comas and start squawking . Those who even noticed need time to forget the resistance priest's warnings and how close +F came to signing. The "Tolerance' doesn't just mean Rome tolerating the SSPX and allowing them more leeway--- It also buys time to teach the SSPX faithful (and priests) to be more tolerant of Vatican II and NO novelties. Once the line is blurry enough between the two, the merger will seem nearly seamless. The seminary built by bequests and widows-mites of the SSPX faithful will be handed over to an unconverted Rome along with the souls in the pews worldwide. The end.
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: Neil Obstat on April 29, 2014, 10:56:05 AM
.

I hope I did not properly understand this sentence:

Post (http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php?a=topic&t=31349&min=5#p4)
Quote from: Matthew
Why doesn't the SSPX write new traditional-sounding hymns?


Why would anyone in the Church, including but not limited to the Society of St. Pius X, need to write "new" hymns!?

This question, quoted above, ignores these four facts:

1)  The literature and archives of the Catholic repertoire of hymns is enormous.  

2)  The hymnals that SSPX chapels use in their pews (a standard hymnal in the pew was compiled under the direction and approval of +W) is only vaguely representative of the variety and size of that repertoire.

3)  The vast majority of Catholic hymns (outside of Gregorian Chant) are not generally, if ever, sung in SSPX chapels.

4)  While it is not impossible to compose traditional-sounding hymns that are actually "new," it is a lot more difficult than it might seem, and there is an abiding inclination to modernize, that most pressingly influences the art of composition, whereas a primary reliance on the already vast storehouse of existing hyms is a much more prudent approach than trying to yet increase this already-huge edifice of existing music.


   Therefore,
     Based on these four facts, in order to increase the variety and horizons of musical selections in any SSPX chapel, what is needed is not "new" hymns "written" (composed is the proper term) but already-existing hymns introduced gradually since it takes a long time to learn familiarity with good literature.  



If you'd like an example of "new" compositions performed in the context of liturgical proceedings, look no further than this recent 'canonization' Mass in Rome this past Quasimodo Sunday.  (Yes, they read the Introit that you see in your TLM missal, which begins with "Quasi modo geniti infantes..." and they read it in Latin!)


.

.
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: Matthew on April 29, 2014, 11:34:04 AM
Quote from: Elizabeth
Quote from: AlligatorDicax

I lived for a while in Northern Virginia, so being provided with a specific place-name by the original poster, I couldn't resist looking up the locale (thus learning that my original impressions were mistaken).


.


At one point, people were claiming the new seminary would be adjacent to the DC "corridors of power".  It's out in the middle of nowhere, really.  


A quick exercise:

1. Take a map of the U.S.A.
2. Put in 2 push pins: 1 for Winona, MN (the old seminary location) and one for the new seminary location.
3. Put in a push pin for Washington DC.
4. Note how much closer the Seminary is moving to where stuff "happens" over on the East Coast. Much more wealth and population there. Within driving distance rather than 1000 miles away, etc.

Before, the seminary was in a more "survivalist friendly" location. Away from large population centers, cozily tucked into the middle of "flyover country".

In 2001 or 2002, Bishop Williamson was getting a natural gas tank and generator installed. The seminary already had quite the farm setup -- garden, orchard, pigs, chickens, cows, and much of our food came from there. 100% of our fruit preserves (for daily breakfast) was produced from the land and the volunteer work of the canning ladies. He infused reality into daily life, trying to re-form the minds of the seminarians who lived there. It worked on me; I don't know about the others. Even small things like having the chef bake bread rather than buying the ridiculous stuff that passes for bread at the store. Everything was "real". Very down to earth and connected to reality. The seminarians did all the chores, the maintenance work, and even chopped wood which provided 1/2 of our heat every winter. And let's not forget +W's famous guideline for when the heat came on every winter -- let's just say he made us wait a bit.

He was trying to make real men out of us. And even though the minimum age was 18, there were plenty of boys entering the seminary :)

And I believe he succeeded with many of us. Remember the saying "nemo dat quod non habet" (no one gives what he doesn't have)? So I'm not surprised that +W was able to help teach us how to be men. He's a man himself.

As many people know, he also expects a chastisement in the near future. He also had a speaker come in and give a talk to the seminarians about biological, chemical, and nuclear warfare survival. He is very friendly to the survivalist movement. He would never have wanted to move the seminary anywhere near the East Coast (of course, it was never up to him).
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: Ekim on April 29, 2014, 12:36:19 PM
Hi Elizabeth, I was speaking of Immaculate Conception Mission in Virginia Beach.  Not Our Lady of Fatima in Richmond, VA.

The point I was trying to make was that with all of the countless dollars being spent on the Taj Ma Hal of Traditional Seminaries, some of that money may have been better used to build a Chapel for the families who sacrificed so much over the years to preserve the Mass and support the Society.  These were normal hard working people, no high dollar donations from lucrative families.
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: holysoulsacademy on April 29, 2014, 02:01:15 PM
Quote from: Matthew

And I believe he succeeded with many of us. Remember the saying "nemo dat quod non habet" (no one gives what he doesn't have)? So I'm not surprised that +W was able to help teach us how to be men. He's a man himself.



That's the crux of the matter right there!
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: Elizabeth on April 29, 2014, 03:17:49 PM
Quote from: Ekim
Hi Elizabeth, I was speaking of Immaculate Conception Mission in Virginia Beach.  Not Our Lady of Fatima in Richmond, VA.

The point I was trying to make was that with all of the countless dollars being spent on the Taj Ma Hal of Traditional Seminaries, some of that money may have been better used to build a Chapel for the families who sacrificed so much over the years to preserve the Mass and support the Society.  These were normal hard working people, no high dollar donations from lucrative families.


I have to agree with you.  The crisis has spawned such a variety of problems over the last 45 years.  A lot of good people have been burned, one way or another.  
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: Thurifer7 on April 29, 2014, 04:00:13 PM
Quote from: ultrarigorist
Quote from: holysoulsacademy
{wordy glossy about FSSP}


Something that has become apparent about FSSP is that while their newest apostolates look just like SSPX and Independent (as least SSPX from a few years ago), their oldest chapels/apostolates are beginning to show the weaknesses in their "position". Immodesty was creeping in, mantillas were becoming more the exception than norm, and most of their kids are being lost to the faith.
I suppose it's like anything else. They receive a moral or spiritual inheritance (as laity from SSPX), and then once that is spent, what follows are solely fruits of their chaplain's labors.
So maybe the acid test is one generation for the fruits to be really manifest, because within the first generation, the influence of parents is predominately visible.


That sounds like an Indult situation.

Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: Ekim on April 30, 2014, 09:34:03 AM
The SSPX was originally in Chesapeake at St. Benedicts Chapel.  This was part of Fr. Williamsons Mass circuit at one time.  After JPII allowed the indult, some members voted to turn the Chapel over to the Bishop Sullivan of the Richmond Dioceses.  St. Benedicts was eventually given to the Fraternity.  They tore down the dated old Chapel and built a very nice church.

Those faithful who were still dedicated to the mission of ABL relocated to Virginia Beach and renamed themselves Immaculate Conception Mission.  They held fund raisers, worked and saved to buy land for construction of a church of their own.  Due to a lack of trust by the Society because of the past betrayal, the folks in Va Beach were told that they had to give the land to the SSPX to be sure of their dedication to the SSPX.   After they turned over the land in full ($275K in 1998) thinking the SSPX would then help them build a church, they were then told they had to now raise 50% of the cost of a Chapel and only then would the SSPX help.  Fifteen to twenty years later, the SSPX still owns their land, dangles carrots, but provides no help in building a chapel.
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: Neil Obstat on April 30, 2014, 10:06:23 AM
Quote from: Ekim
The SSPX was originally in Chesapeake at St. Benedict's Chapel.  This was part of Fr. [Richard] Williamson's Mass circuit at one time.  After JPII allowed the indult,


That would have been 1984, with Quattuor abhinc annos of JPII:  an "indult" is special permission from authority for a subject to do something that would otherwise be unlawful.  (But traditionalists argued that it was never unlawful for any priest to celebrate the Canonized Latin Mass because Quo Primum assured their right to do so without restriction "in perpetuity.")  Fr. Williamson would be consecrated Bishop Williamson 4 years later, in 1988. Ecclesia Dei by JPII came out practically the next day, after the 1988 consecrations of the 4 SSPX bishops.  

Quote
some members voted to turn the Chapel over to the Bishop Sullivan of the Richmond Dioceses.  St. Benedict's was eventually given to the Fraternity.  


What is "the Fraternity?"  The Fraternity of St. Pius X? (FSPX?)

Quote
They tore down the dated old Chapel and built a very nice church.


Was Fr. Williamson involved in building the very nice church?

Quote
Those faithful who were still dedicated to the mission of ABL relocated to Virginia Beach and renamed themselves Immaculate Conception Mission.  


Does this mean that those who remained in the very nice church were no longer dedicated to the mission of ABL?  Under whose leadership would that have been?  Certainly not Fr. Williamson!  Was there another priest?  Maybe from the diocese?

Quote
They held fund raisers, worked and saved to buy land for construction of a church of their own.  Due to a lack of trust by the Society because of the past betrayal,


Who betrayed whom?  To what "past betrayal" do you refer?

Quote
the folks in Va Beach were told that they had to give the land to the SSPX to be sure of their dedication to the SSPX.   After they turned over the land in full ($275K in 1998) thinking the SSPX would then help them build a church, they were then told they had to now raise 50% of the cost of a Chapel and only then would the SSPX help.  Fifteen to twenty years later, the SSPX still owns their land, dangles carrots, but provides no help in building a chapel.



I understand the end of the story but I don't know how you got there.  

.
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: Neil Obstat on April 30, 2014, 10:19:02 AM
.

It's interesting to see accusations of "betrayal" hurled from the SSPX when in fact we are seeing the Menzingen leadership betray the mission of ABL by edging ever closer to the very errors from which the Archbishop kept far away.  

Fr. Pfeiffer gave a sermon recently that is largely all about this topic:
here (http://www.mediafire.com/listen/0f7re7rr8dtfxfk/Fr+J+Pfeiffer+4-24-14+Manchester%2C+NH%2C+Christ+and+the+Truth.MP3) (4-24-14 Manchester New Hampshire, Monday in Easter Week).

.
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: AlligatorDicax on April 30, 2014, 11:24:50 AM
For the official Novus Ordo-diocesan history of "Saint Benedict's Parish [....] Chesapeake, Virginia 23320", see <http://www.stbenedictschapel.org/ (http://www.stbenedictschapel.org/)>.

Now a parish in communion with its N.O. diocese, it has the audacity to claim:
Quote from: www.stbenedictschapel.org
St. Benedict's new church, built from the ground up, is one of the first churches in the world to be designed and used exclusively for the extraordinary form (Latin) of the Holy Mass since the 1960's and was dedicated on March 5, 2011 by the Most Rev. Francis X. DiLorenzo.

Um, wouldn't that claim be true of various earlier SSPX, CMRI, &c., or independent chapels?  Oh, wait!   Perhaps that's technically true, if one limits it to sites that accept the bogus Novus Ordo label "extraordinary form".

Quote from: www.stbenedictschapel.org
Less than a year later the Chapel was canonically erected as a parish.  St. Benedict’s Parishl continues under the provisions of the motu proprio, Summorum Pontificuм, with the permission of His Excellency, The Most Reverend Francis X. DiLorenzo, Bishop of the Diocese of Richmond.  St. Benedict’s Chapel [....] is staffed with priests from the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter.

The Novus Ordo bishop giveth, so the same bishop--or one of his successors--can taketh away.  I'm mystified that some (or all?) FSSP client congregations can be so clueless about that fundamental built-in vulnerability.

(I'd already looked this up out of curiousity on Monday, so I figured that I might as well pass it along today.)
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: Ekim on April 30, 2014, 04:19:15 PM
It is the "Society"of St. Pius X and "Fraternity" of St. Peter.
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: Charlotte NC Bill on May 01, 2014, 09:34:21 PM
To me this unnecessary new Seminary is the "Good Riddance to Bp Williamson Seminary"....that's what the sign there should say..In Latin, Greek and Hebrew..
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: Neil Obstat on May 02, 2014, 02:28:03 AM
Quote from: Charlotte NC Bill

To me this unnecessary new Seminary is the "Good Riddance to Bp Williamson Seminary"....that's what the sign there should say..In Latin, Greek and Hebrew..



Ouch.  

What would that even look like in Latin?  

Maybe it ought to be in English, French and German.
Those are like Latin Greek and Hebrew were In Dies Sub Pontio Pilato.

We could make up some posters and bumper stickers and T-shirts and coffee mugs.
Maybe put it in RED sky writing.  That might get the message out.  



GR+W SEMINARY ~ GOOD RIDDANCE +W




.
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: Neil Obstat on May 02, 2014, 02:50:45 AM
Quote from: Ekim
It is the "Society" of St. Pius X and "Fraternity" of St. Peter.


In France, which is about as far away from here as Virginia is, the SSPX is called the FSSPX, FYI, and is referred to as "the Fraternity."

So the FSSP was involved in St. Benedict's?  You didn't explain that before.  In California we don't have any FSSP, so it's hard for me to imagine how that works.  

Is this correct? :
Quote from: Ekim might have meant to have

The SSPX was originally in Chesapeake at St. Benedict's Chapel.  This was part of Fr. Williamsons Mass circuit at one time.  After JPII allowed the indult [in 1984], some members voted to turn the Chapel over to Bishop Sullivan, of the Richmond Diocese.  St. Benedict's was eventually given to the Fraternity of St. Peter, however.  The FSSP tore down the dated old Chapel and built a very nice church, without the help of the SSPX.


How did the FSSP get involved?  Were they providing Mass there?  Was there an FSSP priest who was a family member of the congregation?

Quote
Those faithful who were still dedicated to the mission of ABL relocated to Virginia Beach and renamed themselves Immaculate Conception Mission.  They held fund raisers, worked and saved to buy land for construction of a church of their own.  Due to a lack of trust by the Society because of the past betrayal in Chesapeake, the folks in Va Beach were told that they had to give the land to the SSPX to be sure of their dedication to the SSPX.  

After they turned over the land in full ($275K in 1998) thinking the SSPX would then help them build a church, they were then told they had to now raise 50% of the cost of a Chapel and only then would the SSPX help.  Fifteen to twenty years later, the SSPX still owns their land, dangles carrots, but provides no help in building a chapel.



This makes a lot more sense now.  Is it correct?   Did I make any mistakes?  If not, what kind of "carrots" does the Society dangle?  Do they provide Mass at the property?  Is there any building there or is it a tent on a dirt field?  Is it a barn?  Is it a residence?  What's going on?

.
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: Ekim on May 02, 2014, 12:07:05 PM
Hi Niel,
At St. Benedicts, the land and Chapel were owned by private individuals  and serviced by the SSPX.  When the indult came out, they gave it to the diocese with the promise from Bishop Sullivan, that he would continue to provide them a priest to offer the Latin Mass.  The owners thanked the SSPX for the years of dedication by telling them their services were no longer needed.  Originally the Mass was offered by an old diocesan priest named Fr. Damian who also had no problems celebrating the Novus Ordo Mass.   Once Father started to push 90 years old, the diocese gave the land and chapel to the Fraternity of St. Peter.

Those who were not willing to sell out to the Richmond Diocese relocated to Virginia Beach.
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: Ekim on May 02, 2014, 12:17:05 PM
As for Carrots, 1st the SSPX said, give us your land and we'll know your serious about us helping you.  In exchange will continue sending priests to offer the sacraments and help the mission to grow. Everyone believed that this also meant help in building a chapel.  After they worked, saved and raised over a quarter of a million dollars cash the SSPX said "Good Job. Thanks for the land.  Now if you want us to help you build a chapel raise another $250,000 dollars cash and then we'll cosign a loan for the rest."

Many folks felt they were betrayed by the SSPX and have moved their families to St. Benedicts in Chesapeake Va
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: Ekim on May 02, 2014, 12:23:00 PM
Just incase the above was not clear.  The folks who moved to Va Beach raised money and brought their own land and then gave it to the SSPX.
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: Frances on May 02, 2014, 02:06:23 PM
 :dancing-banana:
Have any of the "dangerous location" commentators actually BEEN to the new seminary?  Whatever its shortcomings, proximity to the evil Masonic U.S. capitol is not one of them.  It's in "the boonies!". The nearest town is Dillwyn, about eight miles away.  By car, Washington D.C. is a four hour drive.  (Okay, at sspx-priest speed, 3 hours!)   Public transport is nonexistent.   Furthermore, it is at the base of a mountainous area known for its treacherous winter driving conditions.  
A drive-through last summer revealed a distinct lack of cultural ambience.  Think, "Dollar General stores, Country and Western music, red-neck bars!"  Or maybe I drove in from the wrong direction!
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: Elizabeth on May 02, 2014, 03:23:59 PM
Quote from: Frances
:dancing-banana:
Have any of the "dangerous location" commentators actually BEEN to the new seminary?  Whatever its shortcomings, proximity to the evil Masonic U.S. capitol is not one of them.  It's in "the boonies!". The nearest town is Dillwyn, about eight miles away.  By car, Washington D.C. is a four hour drive.  (Okay, at sspx-priest speed, 3 hours!)   Public transport is nonexistent.   Furthermore, it is at the base of a mountainous area known for its treacherous winter driving conditions.  
A drive-through last summer revealed a distinct lack of cultural ambience.  Think, "Dollar General stores, Country and Western music, red-neck bars!"  Or maybe I drove in from the wrong direction!


The Dangerous Locationists!  :laugh2:

It's like the people who believe anyone from England is from London; it's so embarrassing.  Thank you for stating the facts.  There's no way my husband will go down there or allow us to go--way too horrible of a drive.  It's easier to get to NYC.

Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: Charlotte NC Bill on May 09, 2014, 09:57:17 PM
I'm just a little saddened that anyone with the Resistance would go to a conference given by the Sup Gen...he's made a habit of tailoring his message to his audience so where's the benefit in going to see him? He'll tell the Franciscan Sisters one thing on Tue. and Rome something else on Fri...
Title: Review of B. Fellays conference in VA
Post by: nipr on May 09, 2014, 11:17:21 PM
I'd like to make two more comments about Washington, DC before this thread gets buried.  The first is that I by no means wish to discourage anyone from visiting the city.  It is a beautiful city and is a good place to vacation.  Many of the negative things I wrote about Washington can be found in all major cities.  And more importantly, I wrote what I did from the perspective of dangers posed to those seeking a lifestyle of celibacy and poverty in imitation of Christ.  That is entirely different from secular men and women who are allowed many of the things that would pose a temptation to the seminarians.  I loved living there and did so for decades.  

My second comment is about the seminary's distance from DC.  It is a given that traffic in and around DC is horrible, especially during rush hours.  It used to take me 1-1/2 to 2 hours to go each way to work and that was many years ago--way before streets were closed as they are now.  It must be even worse now.  Often I spent 4 hours a day in traffic when I lived just 12 miles from downtown DC.  I did this for years.  If you try to get into the city at the height of rush hour, you sit and wait.  So, you can live very near the city and still spend hours in traffic to get to your destination.  Distance isn't always a factor.

And I worked with people who lived far, far from the city who got up at 4 AM to get to work by 9 and who got home, ate dinner, and went to bed.  They lived so far out because the countryside in both Virginia and Maryland is beautiful and DC is where the action is as far as high-paying jobs are concerned.  I've worked with people who lived in the Shenandoah Valley and made the daily commute and many lived way down in Southern Maryland.  

Given the fact that so many of DC's workers are more than willing to drive for hours to and from work daily, I do not think this seminary is all that far away.  It may well be in the "boonies" but so are other cities I can think of where my friends lived and they worked in DC.  You simply drive to the nearest Metro station and take that into the city.  Then you negotiate the city by Metro.  Northern Virginia has Metro to DC and there are Metro stations all over DC.

If you have never had to fight traffic daily, I know all this sounds horrible.  But actually, you get used to it.  Once you are out of the immediate area of the city, you begin to enjoy the drive while you plan the day ahead or unwind from the day's pressures.  You can listen to audio books or sermons, etc. undisturbed.  You can say the Rosary.  

As for hazardous driving conditions, think inside the city.  It's there that you'll find some of the worst accidents in winter.  Many people who work for the Government have never lived where there is snow.  They don't know how to drive in it.  One or two inches of snow on the roads in the city causes numerous accidents.  Once you get out of the city, you're into areas where people are used to the snow and their vehicles are properly equipped and they know how to drive in it.  I always felt safer outside the city as far as accidents go.  (The young Government employees who can't drive in the snow tend to live in or near the city.)  

Another consideration is that if the powers that be at the seminary become friendly with the Novus Ordo's in Virginia and/or DC, the seminarians could easily find housing for overnight stays and make weekend trips to the city.

Many of us make a long drive weekly or monthly to attend Mass now.  Many of us endure hours in traffic daily for our jobs.  Maybe some of you spend most of the time just sitting and waiting like I did or you're actually moving along the road, but it's still time spent getting from point A to point B.  It's part of life now for some of us.  It might become part of life for the seminarians as well.