In my next to last posting, I had written that Saint Augustine "was an Arab". I went by the preface by an Algerian author who is a minister from the Republic of Algeria and who is also a poet. This author wrote a little book on the life of Saint Augustine. So the opening statement that St. Augustine "was an Arab" of the piece ROOT OF THE THORN, is all what the readers have retained. This is without a doubt what God wants, because the piece that was exposing a "Cohn Benditt" to have played a likely role in a very possible murder of one of the priests of the SSPX (Father Schoonbrood) was too explosive for everyone. Amen!

 

This is my retraction: It is not about such triviality as the ethnicity of a Saint, but about a past series of posting titled "dirty politic". This retraction is about a suggestion of a Cadaver Synod (a.k.a. Synodus Horrenda) of the past Popes since October 1958. I suggested that the Popes J23; P6; JP2; B16) should be defendants in a trial in the same manner as Pope Formosus was in January 897 when he was accused by Pope Stephen VII of the House of Spoleto, this latest House being headed by Duchess Agiltrude whom Formosus had crossed. This suggestion should be considered figurative, if the occasion ever occurs, because it is likely that the future will be marked by the victory of Armagedon and the hurling in the lake of fire of both the Antichrist and the False Prophet. This is for retraction number one.

 

The retraction number two, is that in the previous posting I had given a pass on JP1, because his pontificate lasted only 33 days after having been poisoned (assertively by Cardinal Jean Villot, and Mgr. Marcinkus. Source: Chiesa Viva), and thus this Pope could not have done much damage, all the more than he might have shown a change of heart concerning "Fatima". My retraction is that JP1 should also become a defendant in the suggested Cadaver Synod. JP1 did two things that have damaged the Church. 1. He refused the tiara, thus implying that Christ is no longer the King of kings, since the Pope, as His vicar, was not crowned. 2. He enabled Carol Voztila Katz to become JP2. Those two reasons are sufficient for the former Patriarch of Venice to stand on trial.

 

The enabling of JP2 by JP1 comes from a comment from a priest who had been the private secretary of an elector (Card. Mannings of LA) at both conclaves during the year of the three Popes. The comment was said during a sermon at the time of the announcement of the death of JP2, and stated that upon returning from the election of John Paul I, the elector Cardinal talked about a candidate who "stood head and shoulders" above everyone else. That this candidate was Polish and that it was "too bad that he was not Italian". There we go! Carol Voztila Katz had become a much desired non-electable candidate during the first conclave. It was a matter of the Patriarch of Venice to make a faux-pas to become expandable. John Paul I made possible the Polish former actor, and likely KGB agent to become JP2.

 

A known fact about JP1 is that he chose the name of "John", because he had been made bishop by J23, and the name of "Paul" because he had been made Cardinal by P6. Card. Carol Voztila Katz did not chose the pontifical name John-Paul for the same reason, but simply out of respect for his predecessor. This little well-known detail is a recognizable protocol within some secret societies. JP1 had become useless after foregoing the tiara, and Carol Voztila Katz had shown during the first conclave to be a more desirable candidate for the implementation of a one world religion. As a side remark it is to be said that this is how individuals are treated within some secret society. Does Bishop Fellay wants to deal with such people who now rule the Vatican?

 

This is my "tentative addition" to the Cadaver Synod (figurative). Should Pope Gregory be added? Pope Gregory: Cardinal Siri of Genoa who was elected Pope on the feast day of Christ the King 1958 abdicated shortly after his election at 6pm Rome time. This is not an invention from the sedevacantists. The sedevacantists may have romanced later on about Cardinal Siri, but he was elected. In fact he was elected a second time during the conclave that excreted P6, but by then Cardinal Siri was not the same, and the situation of the Church seemed irreversible (source Chiesa Viva at www.chiesaviva.com ). So should "Pope Gregory" become a defendant since he was the enabler who "started it all"? My response to this suggestion is no. One of the seers of Fatima, Blessed Jacintha spoke of a vision of a Pope standing alone "in a big house" and "with angry people saying bad things to him ". The vision of the Blessed child was the vision of Gregory being pressured to abdicate, with the "big house" being the Sistine Chapel which has its walls drapped during each conclaves. Cardinal Siri of Genoa was the "Pope who would not reign long" that Our Lady of La Salette spoke in 1846. Cardinal Siri was a martyr. He abdicated, and left room for a series of heretic Popes. This is prophecy fulfilled. This is why this addition is "tentative". The Cadaver Synod should include all Popes from John XXIII until Benedict XVI, and Cardinal Siri who was Gregory during a very short reign should be left to rest in peace.