Given the response they got to their previous Dubia, you'd think they would have used a different tactic this time. I'm not sure what the point of this is if there is no follow-up action when Francis ignores them.

I too am not sure what the point is of sending a second Dubia on Aug 21. The five Cardinals stated that Francis did not actually answer the questions on the original Dubia of July 10. That's not surprising, since modernists are known to not like clarity. Maybe they just want Catholics to see the process of what's happening, and to show that they are trying to do something. They were too nice in both their Dubias. They should have mentioned the "H" word at least once (H standing for heresy).

I'm glad to see Zen waking up to who Bergoglio is after he sold the Chinese Church out to the Chicoms.

But, to me, what's more disturbing is that ONLY FIVE Cardinals object to Jorge's open heresy.  3 of the 5 are not "voting" Cardinals, Sarah has 2 years left, and Burke has 5 years.  There are quite a few Cardinals about 1-2 years from retirement, so I'm sure that Jorge intends to hold out for another 2 years at least to make sure the scoundrels he himself appointed will "elect" the next heresiarch.

And he just appointed 21 more cardinals a couple days ago

So, I think we see that state that the Conciliar hierarchy are in, where only 5 Cardinals even "questioned" (that's all it is) Bergoglio's "blessing" of same-sex copulation.

Also, no Cardinal or bishops have called Jorge out for his EENS-denial, heretical ecclesiology, and religious indifferentism.  Those really are his most flagrant heresies, and the one's he's most consistent about.  That's because those things go back to Wojtyla the Great, and the "conservative" Conciliar "bishops" have bought into all that themselves.  When you look at the conservative Novus Ordo crowd, such as exemplified on EWTN, that is THE heresy they promote (even if they're mostly aligned with Traditional Catholic doctrine on other matters).

But, apart from that, if these 5 Cardinals got up tomorrow and issued a declaration that Jorge isn't the pope and that a new pope needs to be elected, and then the 5 of them elected a new pope, would you accept the legitimacy of that pope?  Straight SVs would say that these 5 are not Cardinals, whereas sedeprivationists and R&R would say that they are, with sedeprivtionists holding that they're at least in the position to vote in a conclave.  So for those who believe these are legitimate Cardinals, would you accept their election of a new pope?

Just a quick informal look the list of "Cardinals," I see ...

79 years old -- 14
78 years old -- 13
77 years old -- 9

So 27 of these Cardinals are within a couple years of no longer being eligible to vote.  Within a year, the 136 "electors" will be down to 122, and then the following year down to 109 ... at which point he'll likely appoint another 11 or so more, stacking the deck for the next election.

IMO by the words and actions of the new order bishops and cardinals, they want the parishioners to see that there are some good clergy in the counterfeit church.  Truth is, not one of the so-called clergy are good.  As long as they are N.O. they support abortion and ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs, no matter how much they say, they are not, telling the truth that they are New Order, and that is ok with them to say an adulterated mass. These imposters want to keep the people in the New Order and their money there.  See how the coalition of cancelled priest do it?  They lie.  They are not priests.  The group had on billboards to reinstate them.  They want New Order.  

.

Interesting point. This pretty refutes the absurd idea that there are people in the Novus Ordo hierarchy who profess the Catholic Faith. With the exception of these five, all of them tacitly accepted Bergoglio's errors. This is because silence is a form of consent, especially for someone in a position of authority. All of the "bishops" and "cardinals" who were silent in the face of Bergoglio's errors thereby consented to them. And a person's profession of faith and membership in the Church is determined by their external actions, not their secret thoughts. In pagan Rome, people who offered incense to the pagan idols to avoid death were apostates even if they secretly still believed in the Catholic Faith.

And these same five accept Vatican II.

And these same five accept Vatican II.

Indeed.  In fact, they only even question things when they're obvious heresy, but they have no problem with the pre-existing V2 heresies.