Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Response to an SSPX Priest - by Sean Johnson  (Read 13668 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Neil Obstat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18177
  • Reputation: +8276/-692
  • Gender: Male
Response to an SSPX Priest - by Sean Johnson
« Reply #60 on: December 01, 2015, 03:04:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ekim

    Hey Henry, still waiting for your reply....

    Ten years ago our SSPX priest led a Eucharistic Procession to the steps of the local Novus Ordo parish. There we had Benediction in reparation for the many sins and blasphemy s against Our Lord. (Communion in the hand, Eucharistic Ministers, slovenly dressed parishioners...)  What an example for my children! What a stand for the rights of Our Lord! Now what do you hear from the SSPX in reparation?....CRICKETS!

    Henry, if there is more poison in the soup than ever, why does +Fellay now say it is okay to eat? He now says Religious Liberty is very limited, and the New Mass is legitimate. He says that SSPX must not act as bulldozers. When the guard dog, the very dog who is responsible to serve, protect and defend Christ the King stops barking, it is useless.

    Why has +Fellay reduced the once barking SSPX into a whimpering puppy?


    Looks like H4 doesn't want any dialogue.  HGHHUHA and he likes it that way.

    What you see is what you get, baby.  Next comes point #3..............

    .
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.


    Offline Ekim

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 791
    • Reputation: +818/-103
    • Gender: Male
    Response to an SSPX Priest - by Sean Johnson
    « Reply #61 on: December 01, 2015, 04:50:56 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Perhaps my question was not clear (sarcasm).  Since Henry insists that the SSPX has not changed I will try to be more specific.  Ten + years ago, the SSPX would make public reparation for the very public blasphemy, scandal, and sacrilege, committed by the Novus Ordo Church.  It would expose these scandals in The Angelus and on their website.  They would then educate the faithful why these actions and or Prelates were a danger to the faith.

    Good Henry says that there is more poison than ever.  Henry, so, what is being done to sound the alarm so the faithful do not eat?  What is being done to expose those "chef's" who are poisoning the soup?  

    When I was pursuing a vocation I contacted both Fr. Bissig FSSP, and +Williamson SSPX.  I said to +Williamson "But they are approved.... they say and teach nothing against Catholic faith and morals...". He replied "The danger is not in what they say.  The danger lies in what they don't say. "

    Sadly, the SSPX now commits the same sins of omission...and those entrusted to their care become more diluted, complacent, and indifferent.

    Mary Help of Christians... Pray for us.


    Offline Ekim

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 791
    • Reputation: +818/-103
    • Gender: Male
    Response to an SSPX Priest - by Sean Johnson
    « Reply #62 on: December 01, 2015, 04:58:49 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Again.... Henry, what is the SSPX doing publicly to make reparation for the very public sins and blasphemy's committed against Our Lord in the most  Blessed Sacrament?  What is the SSPX doing publicly to expose and condemn those Bishops (and Pope?), who publicly teach against Catholic faith and morals?

    Offline 1st Mansion Tenant

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1765
    • Reputation: +1446/-127
    • Gender: Female
    Response to an SSPX Priest - by Sean Johnson
    « Reply #63 on: December 02, 2015, 08:55:56 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Where can we get copies of Sean's new book? I am hoping it will be of good use.

    Offline BJ5

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 101
    • Reputation: +2/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Response to an SSPX Priest - by Sean Johnson
    « Reply #64 on: December 03, 2015, 09:28:56 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ekim
    Again.... Henry, what is the SSPX doing publicly to make reparation for the very public sins and blasphemy's committed against Our Lord in the most  Blessed Sacrament?  What is the SSPX doing publicly to expose and condemn those Bishops (and Pope?), who publicly teach against Catholic faith and morals?


    Ok. So to be fair, many, if not all SSPX Chapels hold a Mass and all-night adoration every month on the First Friday to specifically atone for the sins committed against Our Lord in the Blessed Sacrament. And +Fellay has written 2 letters since the Synod directly to and addressing Burgolio.

    I would ask:

    What has Fr.Pfeiffer done publicly to atone for sins against the Blessed Sacrament?
    What has Fr.Zendejas done publicly to atone for sins against the Blessed Sacrament?
    What has Fr.Ringrose done publicly to atone for sins against the Blessed Sacrament?
    What has BP.Fauer done publicly to atone for sins against the Blessed Sacrament?
    What has BP.Williamson done publicly to atone for sins against the Blessed Sacrament?

    Also, I have not seen any public letters that +Williamson, +Fauer, Frs. Pfeiffer, Zendejas, Voigt, Hewko, Chazal, Ringrose have sent to the Pope condemning his teaching against faith and morals (blogs dont count).

    So while we are asking how the SSPX is PUBLICLY dealing with and calling the hierarchy to atonement, we need to also ask where our Resistance is personally calling them to atonement.  Youtube videos don't amount to a hill of beans unless Burgolio, Kasper, and their lot spend time on the internet searching for Resistance sermons. And I don't think any of them are members of this board.


    Offline Ekim

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 791
    • Reputation: +818/-103
    • Gender: Male
    Response to an SSPX Priest - by Sean Johnson
    « Reply #65 on: December 03, 2015, 04:09:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • BJ5,

    The point was that Henry insists that the SSPX has not changed.  This is not true.  Ten+ years ago it was common for the SSPX Priests to hold public acts of reperation, public demonstrations, and publications boldly condemning such abuses.  They no longer make such demonstrations or condemnations.

    That little blurb by +Fellay that you mention was weak...a whimper.  Not the "bark" that the SSPX use to have.

    Offline BJ5

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 101
    • Reputation: +2/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Response to an SSPX Priest - by Sean Johnson
    « Reply #66 on: December 04, 2015, 10:12:39 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ekim
    BJ5,

    The point was that Henry insists that the SSPX has not changed.  This is not true.  Ten+ years ago it was common for the SSPX Priests to hold public acts of reperation, public demonstrations, and publications boldly condemning such abuses.  They no longer make such demonstrations or condemnations.

    That little blurb by +Fellay that you mention was weak...a whimper.  Not the "bark" that the SSPX use to have.


    My point is that we hear nary even a whimper addressed publicly to the Pope by the Resistance.  I certainly get Henry's point, but lest the Resistance priests do what the SSPX used to do, it is kind of disingenuous to throw stones.  To bark at the Pope from the pulpit of the Resistance chapel may play well with the choir but it does nothing to support the R&R position nor bring about a correction.

    The SSPX has a long history of personally annoying the Vatican, starting with +ABL who wrote to the Vatican privately and publicly, badgered the Popes from Paul VI to JPII, visited them, chastised the Popes in person to their face, and sent Paul VI nearly into an apoplectic fit.

    A Resistance priest or Bishop castigating the Pope to a gathering of the Resistance faithful in a Best Western Hotel Room in Pookipsie accomplishes next to nothing.

    Offline Ekim

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 791
    • Reputation: +818/-103
    • Gender: Male
    Response to an SSPX Priest - by Sean Johnson
    « Reply #67 on: December 04, 2015, 02:17:40 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • BJ5, Sounds like fodder for a new thread..."How does the Resistance Compare to the Old SSPX".

    The purpose of this thread was to point out that it IS a NEO-SSPX.