Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Resistance supporters at the indult  (Read 4372 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matto

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6882
  • Reputation: +3849/-406
  • Gender: Male
  • Love God and Play, Do Good Work and Pray
Resistance supporters at the indult
« on: September 15, 2013, 05:16:27 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I learned today that two people who used to go to my chapel are resistance supporters. Strangely enough, they stopped attending the SSPX and now go to the indult. I don't understand how one can say they want to escape the liberalization of the SSPX and then go to the already liberal indult. Oh well. I hear that the priest who says the Mass there is old so he is probably a true priest and they will be getting real sacraments (unless the hosts were consecrated in the Novus Ordo) but still I was very surprised that someone would do that.
    R.I.P.
    Please pray for the repose of my soul.


    Offline Iuvenalis

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1344
    • Reputation: +1126/-2
    • Gender: Male
    Resistance supporters at the indult
    « Reply #1 on: September 15, 2013, 05:20:53 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'm not that surprised. I can see the logic, sorta.

    So, the Society is tending towards NO anyway.

    At least with the conciliar newchurch, you *know* what you're getting, i.e. they don't hide their tendencies.

    I think some people would rather just know for certain what someone's motives are, even if theyre not the authentic faith, at least you know what youre getting.

    Conciliarism, but you know what to expect.

    Know what I mean?


    Offline stgobnait

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1346
    • Reputation: +941/-65
    • Gender: Female
    Resistance supporters at the indult
    « Reply #2 on: September 15, 2013, 05:33:29 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • No, you do not go to the 'indult', you may as well throw the towel in, and submit to the NO, but explain, you 'prefer' bells and smells,  and to wallflower, we are and should be outraged by the insipidness of priests who brought us thus far, in the fight against the NO, only to abandon us when the going got really 'too tough' for them to move from the cocoon that the sspx has become, they know they have let us and our families down... do they care.... probably... but not enough.

    Offline Iuvenalis

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1344
    • Reputation: +1126/-2
    • Gender: Male
    Resistance supporters at the indult
    « Reply #3 on: September 15, 2013, 06:01:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: stgobnait
    No, you do not go to the 'indult', you may as well throw the towel in, and submit to the NO, but explain, you 'prefer' bells and smells,  and to wallflower, we are and should be outraged by the insipidness of priests who brought us thus far, in the fight against the NO, only to abandon us when the going got really 'too tough' for them to move from the cocoon that the sspx has become, they know they have let us and our families down... do they care.... probably... but not enough.


    I *do* agree, but I also understand how people can get tired of a fight they feel is being lost. Every soldier has a crisis of morale. Many loyal Society families drove distances to get to society masses, donated lots of money, all to get kicked in the teeth when ABL's own Society started to get in bed with Rome.

    Many feel so betrayed, they just cannot take that chance again, like heartbreak almost. They don't want to get their hopes up again only to have them dashed by betrayal.

    I didn't say you had to agree, just don't be flippant. A great deal of people are still getting over all this.

    Many don't see any options either. A lot of people aren't going to trust the Society or a Resistance proceeding from the Society after this. They'll wonder, and I have said this in another thread, if the Resistance is sufficiently successful, it too will be subject to the same infiltration, no?

    No discussion has been had about how to structure the Resistance in light of this concern, some bylaws or structure that will prevent future sellouts. Everyone is focused on setting up Mass centres and getting a priest to visit.

    Lastly, scream at people if you will, but many are never going to go CMRI either. Thuc-line is a non-starter for some. It just is.

    So, theyre left with the CMRI, or Independent or Resistance chapel they *don't* know, or the enemy they *do* know. Some have chosen indults (if you want to call them Indults even though they no longer require an indult)

    Offline Bartholemew

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 50
    • Reputation: +112/-2
    • Gender: Male
    Resistance supporters at the indult
    « Reply #4 on: September 15, 2013, 10:22:42 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • People are leaving the SSPX not only for their liberal stance but more for their cultish behavior.
    Parishioners who have been going to SSPX chapels for years are now seeing that the "emperor has no clothes" and are finally realizing that although the SSPX played a big role in preserving tradition in the church in the past, their mission has come to an end. Sadly, the SSPX has now turned into modern day Pharisees who are no longer interested in saving all souls but rather to build "a master race" of perfect, cultlike clones who never question.

    This behavior is subdued in many of the smaller SSPX parishes around the country so it often goes undetected but if you ever decide to move to a larger parish such as Phoenix, Saint Marys or Post Falls, you will see what they are trying to do on a grand scale and it will naturally drive you away if you're not too brain washed already.

    It has come to the point in time where no place is perfect nor will be perfect until God chooses to end the current crisis in the church. In the mean time, Catholics who care must find places where the true sacraments exist and that does include the FSSP and even the indult in some cases.

    God Bless You,

    Bart



    Offline LaramieHirsch

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2718
    • Reputation: +956/-248
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    Resistance supporters at the indult
    « Reply #5 on: September 15, 2013, 10:54:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Bartholemew
    People are leaving the SSPX not only for their liberal stance but more for their cultish behavior.
    Parishioners who have been going to SSPX chapels for years are now seeing that the "emperor has no clothes" and are finally realizing that although the SSPX played a big role in preserving tradition in the church in the past, their mission has come to an end. Sadly, the SSPX has now turned into modern day Pharisees who are no longer interested in saving all souls but rather to build "a master race" of perfect, cultlike clones who never question.

    This behavior is subdued in many of the smaller SSPX parishes around the country so it often goes undetected but if you ever decide to move to a larger parish such as Phoenix, Saint Marys or Post Falls, you will see what they are trying to do on a grand scale and it will naturally drive you away if you're not too brain washed already.

    It has come to the point in time where no place is perfect nor will be perfect until God chooses to end the current crisis in the church. In the mean time, Catholics who care must find places where the true sacraments exist and that does include the FSSP and even the indult in some cases.

    God Bless You,

    Bart



    Interesting.

    The FSSP is growing here in Tulsa, Oklahoma.  A lot of families keep finding their way here.  I look forward to the pontifical Mass that'll be held by Bishop Slattery on October 13th.  
    .........................

    Before some audiences not even the possession of the exactest knowledge will make it easy for what we say to produce conviction. For argument based on knowledge implies instruction, and there are people whom one cannot instruct.  - Aristotle

    Offline Wessex

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1311
    • Reputation: +1953/-361
    • Gender: Male
    Resistance supporters at the indult
    « Reply #6 on: September 16, 2013, 05:27:26 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • If the Society can change its raison d'etre, the laity will as individuals respond to new situations and respond in different ways. If official poicy now is to seek a conciliar niche with some autonomy, the floating trad population will react accordingly. And management will understand that and aim to attract the 'right' congregations and lose those hostile to its plans.

    Folk like to be on the winning side. And statistics will reveal a certain percentage that will change sides at the drop of a hat. The Lefebvrist bandwagon faltered at the turn of the millennium and policy now is to join the mainstream in due course. The winning side for supporters of the SSPX is now conciliation, not defiance. Those so inclined should not see attending indult Masses any great problem unless they are firmly attached to the SSPX brand. And, apart from that, all that really separates these Latin Mass locations are a number of canonical fixes.

    Offline Frances

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2660
    • Reputation: +2241/-22
    • Gender: Female
    Resistance supporters at the indult
    « Reply #7 on: September 16, 2013, 05:59:17 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I don't necessarily agree with going to the 'indult' but if the sspx is the same so far as mental attachment to new mass and Vatican ii, I can understand why many are doing so.  Why drive for hours, family in tow, when same can be had a quarter hour or even walking distance away?  Especially when a family of children's souls is in need of being raised Catholic, and parents know that "home-alone" is un-do-able.  Normally,  Catholic parents aren't expected to bring up and educate their children to be Catholic in complete isolation from Holy Mother Church.  But the times in which we live are abnormal without precedent.  If nothing else is available, the indult may be the best choice of several evils.
     St. Francis Xavier threw a Crucifix into the sea, at once calming the waves.  Upon reaching the shore, the Crucifix was returned to him by a crab with a curious cross pattern on its shell.  


    Offline StCeciliasGirl

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 758
    • Reputation: +421/-17
    • Gender: Female
    Resistance supporters at the indult
    « Reply #8 on: September 16, 2013, 10:17:18 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •  :facepalm: The Society needs to get +Williamson back no matter what it takes (beg, grovel.. kidnap); and act like they're actually resisting the Modernists and not courting them. You know: grow a set. Until then, at least the FSSP are resisting from within and can't of themselves just kick Bishops out. That's embarrassing. Not even the conciliarists do that!
    Legem credendi, lex statuit supplicandi

    +JMJ

    Offline John Grace

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5521
    • Reputation: +121/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Resistance supporters at the indult
    « Reply #9 on: September 16, 2013, 11:30:19 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: StCeciliasGirl
    :facepalm: The Society needs to get +Williamson back no matter what it takes (beg, grovel.. kidnap); and act like they're actually resisting the Modernists and not courting them. You know: grow a set. Until then, at least the FSSP are resisting from within and can't of themselves just kick Bishops out. That's embarrassing. Not even the conciliarists do that!


    Like the Institute of Christ the King, the FSSP are a controlled opposition. It's a bit like conservative Catholic and Zionist, David Quinn writing in the 'Irish Independent' newspaper. The appearance is given of a "conservative voice" when in reality there is no threat at all.

    Bishop Williamson, the one chosen by Archbishop Lefebvre has never left the SSPX. It is Bishop Fellay and his gang of liberals, who have betrayed the Archbishop and seek a new direction.  

    They do not wish to resist the Modernists and other enemies of God. As a Society priest stated the 'expulsion' of Bishop Williamson facilitates a deal. For years they plotted and planned to get rid of Bishop Williamson.

    Offline songbird

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4670
    • Reputation: +1765/-353
    • Gender: Female
    Resistance supporters at the indult
    « Reply #10 on: September 16, 2013, 02:40:55 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • When Fr. Leblanc's church, Our Lady of the Sun, changed hands, the people there went at least 5 different directions! Some home, indult, sspx, cmri and other off the wall places that are just as new order as indult.  You think you know your parishioner friends til there is a scattering of the sheep, then the truth comes out of their hearts.  Very sad!


    Offline Frances

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2660
    • Reputation: +2241/-22
    • Gender: Female
    Resistance supporters at the indult
    « Reply #11 on: September 16, 2013, 04:48:21 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: StCeciliasGirl
    :facepalm: The Society needs to get +Williamson back no matter what it takes (beg, grovel.. kidnap); and act like they're actually resisting the Modernists and not courting them. You know: grow a set. Until then, at least the FSSP are resisting from within and can't of themselves just kick Bishops out. That's embarrassing. Not even the conciliarists do that!

     :incense: :confused1:
    Yes, that is, if he will come back!  Doubtful!  How can H.E. be expected to trust Bp. Fellay and company?
     St. Francis Xavier threw a Crucifix into the sea, at once calming the waves.  Upon reaching the shore, the Crucifix was returned to him by a crab with a curious cross pattern on its shell.  

    Offline Johnnier

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 99
    • Reputation: +0/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Resistance supporters at the indult
    « Reply #12 on: September 16, 2013, 05:17:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • As regards cultish behavior, from an objective stand point, I think those who are getting deeply involved in the whole 'resistance' issue, seem to be taking on this sort of attitude, when they cliam that one should only be going to 'resistance' Mass and stop attending SSPX chapels.

    No, all hold this and I am glad that the moderator here has exhibited a more balanced approach, but I think that we need to keep a proper balance. One can not on one hand attack the SSPX for claiming that it is the Church and then turn around and act as if the 'resistance' is the Church.

    Offline Zeitun

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1601
    • Reputation: +973/-14
    • Gender: Female
    Resistance supporters at the indult
    « Reply #13 on: September 16, 2013, 05:51:09 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Johnnier
    wallflower,

    Yes, this attitude is sad. People just making serious statements about priests without any regard of the seriousness and how they will have to answer seriously before God for it.



    Call the Bishop of Boise and ask why Dr. Ripperger was transferred and ask why he was kicked out of the FSSP.

    I stand by my statement.

    Offline LaramieHirsch

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2718
    • Reputation: +956/-248
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    Resistance supporters at the indult
    « Reply #14 on: September 16, 2013, 07:40:15 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Zeitun
    Quote from: LaramieHirsch
    The FSSP is growing here in Tulsa, Oklahoma.  A lot of families keep finding their way here.  I look forward to the pontifical Mass that'll be held by Bishop Slattery on October 13th.  


    Keep your wife/girlfriend/daughter/mother away from Fr. Ripperger.


    I haven't run into this priest so far.  Fr. Tim Davidson has been running the Latin Mass at this point.
    .........................

    Before some audiences not even the possession of the exactest knowledge will make it easy for what we say to produce conviction. For argument based on knowledge implies instruction, and there are people whom one cannot instruct.  - Aristotle