Thanks for pointing out the problem with Bishop Z's communication. I hadn't really considered what he was saying in regard to the independent priest issue. May I ask....why is Bp. B forming and ordaining independent priests? I don't really have a problem with independent priests, but there must be a reason why Bp. B is doing so. Maybe it can be explained?
TheRealMcCoy mentioned the persecutions that Bp. B has been facing in Ireland (which is very real), but I don't understand how that fits into the reasoning of the need for independent priests. I'm not trying to be difficult; just wanting to understand the situation.
Why shouldn't he ordain independent priests? Where is it written that he has to?
We are not the ordinary jurisdiction of the Church, nor should we pretend to be.
No explaining necessary. If anything the default is for the priest to be independent. If he feels particularly lonely and wants to live in common with other priests, then that is what societies are for. But by default he should be on his own.
I don't understand RealMcCoys point either.
It was Bishop B who wanted things secret not BW.
There is also Fr. Bufe and Fr. Kramer in Ireland. Though the latter has not received conditional ordination.
The bottom line is that many clerics do not like independent priests because they can't control them. That lack of control terrifies them. So they feel they have to set up a parallel church to do that. Rather than accept the will of God for the situation we are in. They can't deal with their own insecurities. Clerics don't have to set up societies to be controlling btw. Insecure clerics exist among those independent. But that is for another discussion....