1. Why was this magnificent ceremony conducted in secret? Why are Fr Z's Masses always conducted in secret only to those who are fortunate to be on the list?
2. I am sorry, but I cannot see this as a continuation of the work of Archbishop Lefebvre.
3. And at the beginning of one of the lists, Matthew again refers to the difficulties with Pablo. What has Pablo posted in the past several months? Is it not more realistic to say that Fr Pfeiffer has dealt with the problem (if the problem has not been blown out of proportion)?
4. Sorry, but Matthew (the voice of the Resistance?) has yet again shown bad judgement.
I broke down your quote into verses, so I can more easily respond.
1. Because there are troublemakers out there. Fact of life. You must not read the newspapers in Connecticut. Certain individuals have been working overtime to make sure Father Zendejas can't buy a retreat property to help convert souls with Ignatian retreats. You'd be shocked if you knew who they were! How beautiful and touching. Seriously though, Father wants to be prudent (as he must be) until he gets a bit more established.
2. Not much substance here -- not much to comment on.
3. I did refer to Pablo's past outrages in a recent post. Yes, the most recent was a WHOLE 9 months ago. Meanwhile we criticize Bishop Fellay for the April Fifteenth Declaration, which was 2 or 3 years ago. But in both cases, has the person publicly apologized, publicly retracted, been demoted, removed, etc.? No. So we can assume things stand the same now.
4. Again, not much substance to debate here. I've never said I was the voice of the Resistance, so this a particularly vapid ad-hominem. And we all know who has recourse to ad-hominem attacks. Hint: It's not those with super-strong arguments or other solid evidence.