CathInfo.com

Max Krah's vision for the neoSSPX is that it become a pro-semitic religious order.  Therefore, anyone who disagrees with the Zionist is anti-semitic by definition.

The SSPX-Resistance realizes Max Krah as a Zionist infiltrator, so the zio-propagandists must label them as "neo-nαzιs".

This is the same propaganda the zio-rag "SearchLight" and Blaise Compton (a.k.a Ashmolean) have touted. Maybe there is a link between them?

I would be sorry to think Ashmo is involved. Whilst the IA team should have stepped in to vouch for him, I think he exaggerated happenings at conferences in London. I don't share his concerns. I take things on board for certain. I wouldn't dismiss a concern but there was nothing in my mind, that I regard as sinister.

The upcoming conference 'Crisis in the SSPX' is about the 'crisis in the SSPX'.

.


From the linked Recusant website page:

We note with astonishment that this article appears to have been written solely for the purpose of uncritically publicising some simply incredible claims, subsequently taken up by others, made against the priests of the SSPX Resistance, the Recusant, the Crisis in the SSPX Conference, and all those involved in it, all of which claims we wish here to deny, to wit:


   that the organizers of the Crisis in the SSPX conference are neo-nαzιs and/or BNP members and/or in any other way "disreputable" people;

   that the conference is a “far-right” political event and/or that the event is aimed at removing Bishop Fellay from his position as Superior General of the SSPX;

   that the conference somehow involves any form of infiltration and/or takeover of the SSPX in this country;

   that Bishop Williamson will be present at this conference and/or is the driving force behind this conference and/or is somehow involved this conference;

   that the conference involves secrecy, plotting, or plots of some sort; and moreover, that the locations, address, dates, timings or other details of our conference have ever been a secret.

This reads like a litany of self-incrimination, such that:


   the perpetrators of the Crisis in the SSPX are Zionist sympathizers and/or anti-BNP members and/or in some way disreputable people;

   this Ralliement with modernist Rome is a “far-left” political movement and/or that it's aimed at retaining Bishop Fellay in his position as Superior General of the SSPX and removing any Resistance cleric from his position;

   the Crisis involves a form of infiltration and/or takeover of the SSPX in the country of Switzerland and/or anywhere else;

   Bishop Fellay will continue to be present in this Crisis and/or is the driving force behind this Crisis and/or is somehow involved this Crisis;

   the agenda of the Menzingen-denizens involves secrecy, plotting, or plots of some sort; and moreover, that the locations, address, dates, timings, docuмents or other details of the Menzingen agenda have ever been a secret.


In regards to this last item, since the Menzingen-denizens are ALL ABOUT
PLOTTING AND SCHEMING, they naturally cannot imagine that their enemies
would be doing anything else BUT plotting and scheming against them.



*I'm American, so deal with it.