Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Resistance enemies are cowardly scoundrels  (Read 6817 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Resistance enemies are cowardly scoundrels
« Reply #10 on: May 28, 2013, 04:08:15 PM »
One ought to expect this sort of behavior from those with guilty consciences.  Which saint didn't endure calumny?  Since the conference will be posted for the public, let the rumor-mongers be revealed for what they are.  

Resistance enemies are cowardly scoundrels
« Reply #11 on: May 28, 2013, 04:13:00 PM »
.


Quote from: John Grace
I had actually forgotten about  Damian Thompson until that article.



Who's Damien Thompson? . . . . . . . . . . HAHAHAHAHAHAHA






Resistance enemies are cowardly scoundrels
« Reply #12 on: May 28, 2013, 04:27:51 PM »
Quote from: Elsa Zardini
Well said Incredulous. May I add that that might pose a problem for them:

Semita: Hijos de Sem (hebreos, arabes y sirios); familia etnográfica y lingüística que comprende los diversos pueblos que hablan o hablaron arameo, siríaco, caldeo, asirio, hebreo, arabe y himiarita (Larousse Dictionary).

Now, “if anti-semitism is bad it’s against Truth. If something is True is not bad”.
 
So either,

1. Antisemitism is good and hence it can not be punishable and the 7,000,000,000 human beings (semitics included) ought to be anti-semitic (because it is good), or,

2. Antisemitism is bad and hence it is not Truth because if it is True it can’t be bad, and hence, if not True, what is it? Now, in Spanish, two words: Verdad/Verdadero (should only apply to God, hence capitals) vs. mentira/mentiroso; and certeza/cierto vs. falso/falsedad. In English?

If correct, and I really don’t know, isn’t that a dilemma (Mt.XXI,23-27) for the “anti-semitic” ones? Also see EC 34.



If only it were that simple, Elsa Zardini.

The problem with so-called anti-Semitism is in what it is.  I don't think you'll
find any dictionary that accurately defines it.  

So I will define it for you, so then it will make sense.

It is this: anti-Semitism is whatever the Zionist Jews don't like.  Their own
subjective judgment defines what is and what is not anti-Semitism.  
Therefore, something is anti-Semitic if the Zionist Jews don't like it.  
Something is anti-Semitism if it describes something the Zionist Jews don't like.
Someone is an αnтι-ѕємιтє if they are someone the Zionist Jews don't like, or
if they do enough things that the Zionist Jews decide is too much of the kind
of things they don't like.

It's all about THEM.  They are the "masters" and everyone else is the goyim
(that means 'the cattle'.)

Go to Wal*Mart and see the rows and rows of "GOYA" food products on the
shelf.  Coincidence?  Why choose that name?  IN YOUR FACE, GOYA.  Stand
there for a while and try to find a Jєωιѕн person buying Goya food products.
Watch them go down the aisle and deliberately avoid even LOOKING at them.
A stock clerk who is Jєωιѕн probably won't want to TOUCH the Goya products.
Check it out.

They are the Masters and thou art cannon fodder.  Thine is not to question
why ~ thine is but to do or die!


Get it?  They tell you.  You listen and obey.  End of story.

E.g., Fellayism.



Resistance enemies are cowardly scoundrels
« Reply #13 on: May 28, 2013, 06:22:16 PM »
The Recusant should not go out of its way to justify itself to these media whores. They have a scoop and want to relay it to those who gobble up stories guaranteed to be juicy. Religious themes are favourite because, morally speaking, they presuppose clergymen falling from a great height or doing something that is not politically correct. For them, once mainstream churches become politically correct, it is no longer news. And these mainstream churches are no better than newspapers in exercising malice.

Back in 2011, the traditional group, Pro Eccleisia, organised a conference with Cardinal Burke as speaker in Methodist Central Hall, Westminster (of all places!). When someone hinted it would be critical of the hierarchy, he withdrew. His replacement was Fr. Paul Kramer and Robert Sungenis. But staff at Westminster Cathedral contacted the Methodists warning them of the speakers' 'alarmist Fatima theories' and 'anti-semitism'. The hall suddenly became unavailable.  


Resistance enemies are cowardly scoundrels
« Reply #14 on: May 28, 2013, 06:33:26 PM »
Just what you would expect from a mainstream journalist. What else would you expect them to do except maybe just ignore it. :fryingpan:

But don't they say there is no such thing as bad publicity.