To all the women in the K. clan, who run the chapel in question with Fr. Francis M:

You just don't like the truth about your priest. You are going to have an uphill battle convincing any prospective parishioners about the training, validity, and/or suitability of Fr. Francis. Even if you convinced me right now, I would only be one person. You'd still have an uphill battle going forward.

My main point is that your chapel/priest is not Resistance. And he isn't. That isn't an attack, that's a simple fact. You can call it an independent chapel, but to claim it's Resistance is to try to ride on the coattails of our movement.

How long was Fr. Francis in the SSPX seminary? That's how many years of actual priestly training he's had.  A priest is supposed to have 6 years. If he's already had an awesome classical education (Greek, Latin, philosophy, classics, etc. like Bishop Williamson) he might skip Philosophy and study for only 4 years.

Stating an unpleasant fact with candor isn't the same thing as an attack, name calling, or lack of charity. Confusing those two is Pfeifferite nonsense.
 
 And my conscience and the virtue of Charity demands that I clarify this, since Samuel isn't updating his outdated directory. It would be a disaster for an old SSPX/Resistance supporter to end up at a completely non-Resistance chapel, with a poorly trained (at least!) priest, due to my own laziness or fault.

P.S. I should also point out, for the third-parties who read this, that I've never met or argued with a K. male online, except for Stephen who went to Fr. Pfeiffer's "seminary". He probably wanted to get away from the strong female domination in his home. But I've met at least 2 females from the K. clan on CathInfo -- they are all strong women to say the least -- they are concerned with the world outside the home, controversies in religion, the Resistance, running an independent chapel, etc. I have to ask: Where are all the men, whose job this is? I've met the patriarch of the family (N____) several times, and he's quite meek and quiet. I must point out that this (objective) disorder is another, minor, icing-on-the-cake reason to reject your (female) choice of Fr. Francis as a good priest. How could you possibly judge his suitability, education, etc. as a man would? Such important decisions are for men, not women who God created more emotional and hence they easily fall for a pious exterior with plenty of problems under the surface. How many years were you in the seminary?

But even if a man had chosen thus poorly, it wouldn't make a random independent chapel into a Resistance chapel. That is the issue here. There is a reason why none of the (4) Resistance bishops thought it was a good idea to ordain Fr. Francis at this point in time. I have no idea what their reasons were, but they obviously had good reason(s).

Women should be silent in the Churches, and if they wish to know any thing, they should ask their husbands at home, or learn from other men. Hey, don't get mad at me, take it up with St. Paul! :)