Author Topic: Request for Bishop Ambrose Moran Summary (Read 3951 times)

Patrick JK Gray · « **Reply #5 on:** October 27, 2015, 05:15:37 AM »

Thank you. I shall listen to Fr Chazal's video -- I have no doubts about the man since I read your summaries, he is a fraud. Neither a Bishop nor a priest. May the good Lord help us.

Recusant Sede · « **Reply #6 on:** October 27, 2015, 05:53:40 AM »

Quote from: TheRealMcCoy

Quote from: Recusant
Honestly, let's not turn this thread into something with frivolous posts. I suggest everyone keep their posts serious and perhaps pin it. Remember the man is sick and still has an immortal soul that our Lord and Lady want saved.

Sir, are not the man's own claims fantastical? He is not being mocked here. We are sheep, sir, not shepherds. When the shepherds' themselves bring in the wolf we sheep by instinct will start to bleat. Bleating is not a pretty sound.

What I am saying is that this thread is supposed to be a list of Moran's misdeeds. Posts should be kept to the point so when someone needs to find information on this miscreant it can be easily located and one will not have to rummage through tons of unnecessary posts.

BTW: I'm not a stick in the mud nor am I a very holy person so I do find many of the posts humorous, but I also think there is a time and place for it and I need to keep reminding myself of how awful of a sinner I am.

TKGS · « **Reply #7 on:** October 27, 2015, 06:38:17 AM »

When I read the post from Matthew, I am reminded of all the supposed secret, un-traditional, and incredible claims of Malachi Martin. A lot of traditional Catholics seemed to love him in spite of the fact that he wasn't traditional, didn't wear clerical garb, and claimed to know all kinds of things that would shock us if we only knew (but, of course, he was not at liberty to disclose).

The only difference I can see in the two is that Malachi Martin was more credible than this fellow who seems to have found a niche with a group of traditionalists who "need" a bishop and are willing to overlook any facts to get someone who claims to be one.

LucasL · « **Reply #8 on:** October 27, 2015, 06:40:18 AM »

There are two major threads where there all the evidence, pictures, letters, signatures etc

If we go there we may paste (quote) here
There are so many pages on the thread but it's worth. Unfortunately I never organized the evidence, all files I have are all over the place.

The thread I'm taking about is the one started on Oct 11 or 12

Ladislaus · « **Reply #9 on:** October 27, 2015, 08:55:28 AM »

Quote from: LucasL

Quote
Prince Regent of Serbia
Successor of Cardinal Slipyj
Papal privilege
Metropolitan of Kiev
Archbishop of New York
Exarch of the Patriarchate of Alexandria
Two doctorates (in psychology!)
Theologian
World leading expert in neuropsychiatry
High studies with Salesians, Russian Jesuits, Rome, Fordham, Maryknoll, Bacon College, Columbia University
Friend of presidents, important contacts with the Vatican and Pentagon

Slipyj sent him to the USSR to set up a underground facility
The New Saint Josaphat by John Paul II

:roll-laugh1:

:roll-laugh1: :roll-laugh1: :roll-laugh1:

Hey, get your facts straight.

That's "St. Josaphat the New".