Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Recognize and Resist wasnt meant to go Cryogenic  (Read 3312 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Recognize and Resist wasnt meant to go Cryogenic
« Reply #5 on: June 12, 2014, 01:35:21 PM »
I believe there is more to it than that. Michael Davies spoke ecplicitly on it, it has been expressed by many and can be linked back to Mons. Legebvre, and the basica assumption is that
Fact: it is not a permanent position
Not fact: there is no expiration date.

What some people infer from this is that the
Society should hurry up and compromise blindly failing to see what happened to so many others.

The end result will be a miracle and the restauration of each diocese whether that is through interregnum or some conversion or whatever it may be it isn't for us to know how or when so there can be no expiration date.

Recognize and Resist wasnt meant to go Cryogenic
« Reply #6 on: June 12, 2014, 04:52:36 PM »
I wish you all the best, Soulguard. I shall miss thee.

Learn from thy banishment and follow through on thine holy plans.


Recognize and Resist wasnt meant to go Cryogenic
« Reply #7 on: June 12, 2014, 05:10:20 PM »
is he really gone.... :tinfoil:

Recognize and Resist wasnt meant to go Cryogenic
« Reply #8 on: June 13, 2014, 11:57:54 AM »
So, soul 'guard' , you were finally honest enough to expose your real loyalty. Like Fellay, Rostand, LeRue, Pflugger and their cohorts, you RESENT arbp Lefebvre for bringing you into this dessert for forty years, and like the Israelites of old you complain that Moses is going to allow you to 'die' a horrible death as a Traditionalist , rather than live in peace and prosperity amongst the heathens of Rome(Egypt).

Well, we accept your challenge! Bring us a formal acceptance from either Bishop Fellay, Father Rostand, Father LeRoux, Father Lorans, Father Schmidberger, or Father Pflugger, and we will debate them on the issues-- openly, fairly, and squarely.

We suggest the primary topic: "resolved, the words and actions of Fellay and his advisors toward
Rome within the contexts of the Preamble of 2011 and the Declaration of Fellay of April 15th, 2012 were destructive to the mission and the spirit of the SSPX, and a violation of the trust put into Fellay by Archbishop Lefebvre and SSPX faithful."

We will arrange an open, public, impartial debate venue, and professional, impartial debate moderators. I propose each side presenting their statement, the opposing side to follow up; and then each side to then present their distinct, succinct arguments of ten minutes each, with rebuttal by the opposing side.
  Following which, the audience will have been allowed to submt questions to the moderators, to which each side will be allowed to address. I propose that the dabate expenses be
Carried by the nominal admission fee of the audience. I heartily agree with you-- the fraud of Fellay has gone on way too long. Because he is able to prevaricate consistently and say different things  to different people, he and Rostand always claim " you don't know what Fellay meant"

Finally, by your generous offer, the faithful will at long last find out what  "Fellay meant"

I await His Excellency's acceptance; and wil correspond with whomever he designates to make all necessary arrangements. If Bp. Fellay desires to have someone else speak for him, that is okay,he must send me a letter saying that "so and so will speak in my stead and represent all my interests in this debate; so and so is fully authorized to speak for me and to answer officially for me and my advisors in the SSPX."

Let the debates begin-- and stop this enless gobbledeguck from robo-writers on the net and in the SSPX publications.




Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Recognize and Resist wasnt meant to go Cryogenic
« Reply #9 on: June 13, 2014, 12:19:34 PM »
Quote from: hugeman
Like Fellay, Rostand, LeRue, Pflugger and their cohorts, you RESENT Abp. Lefebvre for bringing you into this desert for forty years, and like the Israelites of old you complain that Moses is going to allow you to 'die' a horrible death as a Traditionalist, rather than live in peace and prosperity amongst the heathens of Rome(Egypt).


This is a good analogy. It's true that the Israelites murmured against Moses because the exile in the desert "went on for too long" even though Moses was just executing God's orders.

They yearned for the "flesh pots of Egypt" just like Trads today yearn for a peaceful parish life 10 blocks from their home, without being called any names, etc.