Presumption is a sin, as are detraction and gossip.
I encourage you to cease.

Sure that is fair to say. Is the content of what I said though incorrect?

God gave us all free will and a brain.

 These are proper to human persons, though it is apparent that not all possess said properties, or are not in full possession of them; a couple of examples of the latter would be some particular congenital birth defects, or one newly conceived who has both potentially, though neither actually.

 I think the bigger insult to God is not to use them and follow blindly.  

Presumably you mean invariably. What is meant by "... walk by faith..." for example?

This is a resistance forum made up of people who have not followed blindly.

So it is said.

 There is so much wrong in the world, its your duty to question.

Presumably you don't mean incessantly.

  Other than that why are you on this forum, to learn about how flat the earth is and learn about baptism of desire?

To give credit where due, this was hilarious; sometimes one wishes that the big smelly elly would re-rig for silent.

Presumption, come on.

To be fair, this could use some specificity from the would-be sheepdog.

 Jesus said by their fruits you shall know them.  The quote goes on about ripping the plant out, root and stem.  He never said wait till next season, don't presume, it may be a bad year.

1. Specify and cite.
2. What does it mean. (not "to me" or "to you" but to the Church?)

  I have not seen one good result that has come out of Boston, KY.  

That's as may be, but does it necessarily follow that we should point it out? There is sin in speech and silence. I "lived" at OLMC. While I concur that people should be warned, at least in general, past a certain point it becomes sinful overkill.

I'll go one better; given time that place is gonna "Jonestown".

If need be, I'll go into specs, but there isn't much cause to go into the gory with those impotent to act.

I've said elsewhere here that "Pablo" should be under surveillance, as well as the gas station/post office/Lodge area. I stand by what I said, but people shouldn't assume what hasn't been shown nor said.

Why did and do I say these things? For the same reason you push someone about to step into a snake-pit; to say nothing n such an instance is sinful.

So, I'm not trying to pick on you, but that said I will tell you at least one good "result" via Pfeiffer that is very appropriate here. "There's the right way, the wrong way, and the Catholic way."

At the very least, read the newspaper interview with Pablo about when he was a "lay exorcist." Every single report

Is the word "report" really warranted here?

 about how he mismanages money and control, is a sign of the fruit of Boston.  

Could this, for example, be a dogwag?


Finally for now, besides the other charges, how much of these reports(?) are hearsay? If a thing is hearsay, how likely is it that we should be repeating it regardles of what Catholic category or categories that it may fall into?