CathInfo.com

1. I don't know what you're talking about (re: "4 baptisms")

2. "His" theology regarding the NOM is the only one that fits all the requirements, and makes the most sense. I'm not going to get into a sedevacantist debate here to derail the thread, but let's just say +ABL's "recognize and resist" position holds its own against all other theories on the Crisis, ESPECIALLY sedevacantism.

3. Yes, he was a frail human being -- like all the other saints canonized by the Church. Except for our Blessed Mother, all the saints had Original Sin and fought against personal sin as well.

4. I disagree with you because I think +ABL did go straight to heaven, and someday when the Church is restored he will be one of the first men of heroic virtue during this Crisis to be canonized.

5. You have to cut him some slack though -- he didn't have access to the great wisdom of the armchair lay theologian "Incredulous" who pits his own opinions and theology against those of the prelate chosen by the Pope to represent all of French-speaking Africa, the prelate chosen to help compose schemata (docuмents, basically a to-do list and outline) for Vatican II, etc.

+ABL had great education and experience, dealt with several Popes -- but alas, he didn't have Incredulous to help him with his theology. What a shame.

6. Marcel Lefebvre, ora pro nobis.

Who said anything about Bishop Fellay? The statements you quoted are all from ME and I never claimed otherwise!