Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: ELEISON 379 - OCTOBER 18, 2014  (Read 44834 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline magdalena

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2553
  • Reputation: +2032/-42
  • Gender: Female
ELEISON 379 - OCTOBER 18, 2014
« Reply #210 on: October 24, 2014, 11:17:12 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: curioustrad
    Quote from: magdalena
    Quote from: Elsa Zardini
    Quote from: magdalena
    It's the Holy Catholic Faith that needs defending, not a so-called "seer" and her messages.


    Requesting the prayer of the Rosary, is not defending the Holy Catholic Faith?


    Praying the Holy Rosary is a must for every Catholic.  It doesn't take a seer for us to know that.  Though absolutely necessary, defending the Faith involves more than prayer.  It involves speaking out against the errors of Vatican II and all the horrors in its aftermath by those who should be our shepherds, and the willingness to shed our blood if necessary so that it not be degraded.


    Exactly and one further point theologically speaking the Rosary is not the sum totality of the Faith, if it were, what did our forebears in the Faith do until the time of St. Dominic i.e. before there was a Rosary ? (I pray mine everyday for the fulfilment of the requests at Fatima !)


    That and its twin reparation to the Sacred Heart through the First Fridays.  The Revolution in the Church began there.
    But one thing is necessary. Mary hath chosen the best part, which shall not be taken away from her.
    Luke 10:42


    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31196
    • Reputation: +27112/-494
    • Gender: Male
    ELEISON 379 - OCTOBER 18, 2014
    « Reply #211 on: October 25, 2014, 01:05:20 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: curioustrad

    Exactly and one further point theologically speaking the Rosary is not the sum totality of the Faith, if it were, what did our forebears in the Faith do until the time of St. Dominic i.e. before there was a Rosary ? (I pray mine everyday for the fulfilment of the requests at Fatima !)


    You're not exactly correct. The Rosary does sum up most of our Faith, at least in its essentials.

    Apostles Creed - Cover the important dogmas right there -- at least the ones the Apostles thought important!
    Our Father - The one prayer Our Lord taught us personally
    Hail Mary - Angelic Salutation, half of it is in Scripture itself
    Glory Be - Doxology of praise to God as Trinity
    O My Jesus - Prayer the angel taught the shepherd children to say, for the salvation of souls
    Hail Holy Queen - Beautiful prayer to Our Lady, which is another hallmark of Catholicism (devotion to the Blessed Mother and seeking her intercession)

    The 15 mysteries of the Rosary cover most of the main dogmas of our Faith. "Who by his life, death, and resurrection has purchased for us..."

    You need not ask, "What did they use before the time of St. Dominic" because we're not in the time of St. Dominic. To paraphrase Gandalf, the Rosary "is never late. It arrived exactly when it meant to."

    Seriously, God's Providence gave us the Rosary exactly when it was needed. It would be needed on a "from now on" basis, which is why it's so important to this day.

    The whole world gives witness to the fact that the Rosary is the quintessential Catholic prayer. When people see a Rosary, they know they're dealing with a Catholic (or at least a Catholic wannabe/cultural Catholic).

    No one mistakes the religion of someone carrying a Rosary.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


    Offline magdalena

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2553
    • Reputation: +2032/-42
    • Gender: Female
    ELEISON 379 - OCTOBER 18, 2014
    « Reply #212 on: October 25, 2014, 06:23:02 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Matthew
    Quote from: curioustrad

    Exactly and one further point theologically speaking the Rosary is not the sum totality of the Faith, if it were, what did our forebears in the Faith do until the time of St. Dominic i.e. before there was a Rosary ? (I pray mine everyday for the fulfilment of the requests at Fatima !)


    You're not exactly correct. The Rosary does sum up most of our Faith, at least in its essentials.

    Apostles Creed - Cover the important dogmas right there -- at least the ones the Apostles thought important!
    Our Father - The one prayer Our Lord taught us personally
    Hail Mary - Angelic Salutation, half of it is in Scripture itself
    Glory Be - Doxology of praise to God as Trinity
    O My Jesus - Prayer the angel taught the shepherd children to say, for the salvation of souls
    Hail Holy Queen - Beautiful prayer to Our Lady, which is another hallmark of Catholicism (devotion to the Blessed Mother and seeking her intercession)

    The 15 mysteries of the Rosary cover most of the main dogmas of our Faith. "Who by his life, death, and resurrection has purchased for us..."

    You need not ask, "What did they use before the time of St. Dominic" because we're not in the time of St. Dominic. To paraphrase Gandalf, the Rosary "is never late. It arrived exactly when it meant to."

    Seriously, God's Providence gave us the Rosary exactly when it was needed. It would be needed on a "from now on" basis, which is why it's so important to this day.

    The whole world gives witness to the fact that the Rosary is the quintessential Catholic prayer. When people see a Rosary, they know they're dealing with a Catholic (or at least a Catholic wannabe/cultural Catholic).


    No one mistakes the religion of someone carrying a Rosary.


    Very true; however, the Holy Mass is at the top of what sums up our Faith.  It is the first thing attacked by those who wish to destroy it.
    But one thing is necessary. Mary hath chosen the best part, which shall not be taken away from her.
    Luke 10:42

    Offline magdalena

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2553
    • Reputation: +2032/-42
    • Gender: Female
    ELEISON 379 - OCTOBER 18, 2014
    « Reply #213 on: October 25, 2014, 06:35:58 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: magdalena


    Very true; however, the Holy Mass is at the top of what sums up our Faith.  It is the first thing attacked by those who wish to destroy it.


    Yet in saying that, the Holy Rosary is the great gift of Our Lady in these tumultuous times.
    But one thing is necessary. Mary hath chosen the best part, which shall not be taken away from her.
    Luke 10:42

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31196
    • Reputation: +27112/-494
    • Gender: Male
    ELEISON 379 - OCTOBER 18, 2014
    « Reply #214 on: October 25, 2014, 06:58:12 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: magdalena
    Quote from: magdalena


    Very true; however, the Holy Mass is at the top of what sums up our Faith.  It is the first thing attacked by those who wish to destroy it.


    Yet in saying that, the Holy Rosary is the great gift of Our Lady in these tumultuous times.


    Let's just say I'm very trigger happy when I hear people downplaying devotion to Our Lady, the Rosary, Fatima (about the greatest of all "modern day" apparitions)...

    I know CuriousTrad wasn't going that far, but I wanted to make my point nevertheless.

    Just because the Church didn't need something 1000 years ago doesn't mean we don't need it today. To think otherwise is to have a "time traveler's" mentality. We human beings are subject to time -- who cares how necessary (or unnecessary) the Rosary was 1000 years ago!

    When you go traveling through space & time in the TARDIS, or slingshot back in time using a sun (like the Enterprise in Star Trek IV), then go ahead and leave your Rosary behind as you leave the machine as long as you've landed before, say, 1200.

    But for the rest of us stuck in good old 2014, let's not be academic about how "technically superfluous" the Rosary is. To emphasize or even say such things is extremely offensive to pious ears -- at best.

    It's part of the will of God for us 21st Century Catholics.

    Piety is not a bad thing, I might point out. Excessive piety (say, at the expense of doctrine) is bad, but so is defective piety!
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


    Offline curioustrad

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 427
    • Reputation: +366/-7
    • Gender: Male
    ELEISON 379 - OCTOBER 18, 2014
    « Reply #215 on: October 25, 2014, 09:39:46 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Matthew


    Let's just say I'm very trigger happy when I hear people downplaying devotion to Our Lady, the Rosary, Fatima (about the greatest of all "modern day" apparitions)...

    I know CuriousTrad wasn't going that far, but I wanted to make my point nevertheless.

    Just because the Church didn't need something 1000 years ago doesn't mean we don't need it today. To think otherwise is to have a "time traveler's" mentality. We human beings are subject to time -- who cares how necessary (or unnecessary) the Rosary was 1000 years ago!


    Matthew that was not my point at all. I was replying:

    Quote from: curioustrad
    (...) theologically speaking the Rosary is not the sum totality of the Faith, if it were, what did our forebears in the Faith do until the time of St. Dominic i.e. before there was a Rosary ? (I pray mine everyday for the fulfilment of the requests at Fatima !)


    to this statement:

    Quote from: Elsa Zardini

    Requesting the prayer of the Rosary, is not defending the Holy Catholic Faith?


    My argument using "sum totality" might have been clearer if I had said that the Rosary is not "co-extensive" with the Faith. The "Faith" as Faith preceded the institution of the Rosary but that it is a vital tool for the propagation of the Faith is certain:

    Leo XIII makes very clear the role of the Rosary in Magnae Dei Matris from 1892

    Quote


    14. To this commendation of the Rosary which follows from the very nature of the prayer, We may add that the Rosary offers an easy way to present the chief mysteries of the Christian religion and to impress them upon the mind; and this commendation is one of the most beautiful of all. For it is mainly by faith that a man sets out on the straight and sure path to God and learns to revere in mind and heart His supreme majesty, His sovereignty over the whole of creation, His unsounded power, wisdom, and providence. For he who comes to God must believe that God exists and is a rewarder to those who seek Him. Moreover, because God's eternal Son assumed our humanity and shone before us as the Way, the Truth, and the Life, our faith must include the lofty mysteries of the august Trinity of divine Persons and of the Father's only-begotten Son made Man: "This is eternal life: that they may know thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou bast sent."


    Not all of the mysteries of Faith are contained in the Rosary - but the chief mysteries are - as you pointed out following Leo XIII.

    The precise efficacy of the Rosary is, according to Pope Benedict XV:

    Quote


    Being a prayer of supplication and of intercession, it is undeniably perfect: whether by the praises it addresses and the invocations it expresses, the aid it procures and the teachings it contains, or by the graces and the victories it leads up to.
    Letter to reverend C. Becchi O.P. September 18, 1915 (Cited The Rosary - Papal Teachings Series, Solesmes p 161)

    Following Benedict XV the efficacy of the Rosary comes from the fact that it is prayer, and prayer puts us in touch with God, who is the source and author of all grace.

    I do not recall speaking of Fatima in a negative way in my comment but that is the pre-eminent intervention of Our Lady in the modern age to recall prime principles of the spiritual life and to achieve world peace through the triumph of the devotion to her Immaculate Heart. I said I pray the Rosary every day to this end.

    I am, however, wary of those who would invert the hierarchy of public Revelation over private revelations and have us believe that private revelations are greater than Public Revelation. For me - that is what this whole thread has been about. I am not for one moment that you or I agree in any way over any of this - but thank you for a lively and frank debate.
    Please pray for my soul.
    +
    RIP

    Offline Elsa Zardini

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 317
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    ELEISON 379 - OCTOBER 18, 2014
    « Reply #216 on: October 25, 2014, 10:28:33 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • "I am, however, wary of those who would invert the hierarchy of public Revelation over private revelations..."

    Such as curioustrad? You are referring to this thread, right?

    Offline ultrarigorist

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 577
    • Reputation: +905/-28
    • Gender: Male
    ELEISON 379 - OCTOBER 18, 2014
    « Reply #217 on: October 25, 2014, 10:35:17 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •  :confused1:


    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31196
    • Reputation: +27112/-494
    • Gender: Male
    ELEISON 379 - OCTOBER 18, 2014
    « Reply #218 on: October 25, 2014, 10:49:30 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • CuriousTrad,

    Thank you for clarifying.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline curioustrad

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 427
    • Reputation: +366/-7
    • Gender: Male
    ELEISON 379 - OCTOBER 18, 2014
    « Reply #219 on: October 25, 2014, 04:20:42 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Elsa Zardini
    "I am, however, wary of those who would invert the hierarchy of public Revelation over private revelations..."

    Such as curioustrad? You are referring to this thread, right?


    Yes indeed. Throughout this thread we have had people referring to and attempting to justify an alleged set of private "revelations".

    My point has been (from the first) many people in the wake of the catastrophe of Vatican II and the loss of mystery and awe because of the banality of the new liturgies, the prevailing atmosphere of theological confusion because of some of the teachings of Vatican II (ecuмenism, collegiality and religious liberty) have sought refuge in private revelation as a way of replacing banality with mystery and as far as doctrine is concerned for explaining and perhaps resolving the crisis that has come upon the Catholic Church. Apparitions are sometimes used as a parallel Magisterium, sometimes opposed to the Magisterium (here I am thinking of Medjugorje with which even the Novus Ordo authorities have had serious difficulties).

    Simply because of the presence of chaos in the Church today does not excuse us from obedience to the teachings of the Church with regard to the treatment of seers and claimed apparitions - a healthy skepticism is the ticket.

    Someone (in this thread) was kind enough to quote St. John of the Cross who also excoriates those attracted to private revelations and warns of the dangers of placing too much and a rash confidence in them.

    Someone else referenced the use of private revelations that some people make to avoid dealing with questions such as has the Pope defected in matters of Faith and morals ? Has the universal body of bishops erred ? I do not answer "yes" to these questions - because I do not believe the answer can be "yes" to those questions (but I entertain theological speculation on the point since it might just be the truth - and Francis almost daily pushes the envelope on this as I'm sure most of us would agree) - but as one rightly pointed out an "apparition" is sometime a way of avoiding the theological inconveniences these questions will raise.

    Recourse to apparitions and "Our Lady said this..." on the matter, may be true and therefore helpful if true, but they may also be false and potentially damaging to souls.

    In the end the only issue for me is that in the question of claimed "apparitions" caution is advised - the exercise of the cardinal virtue of prudence !
    Please pray for my soul.
    +
    RIP

    Offline Fortitudo

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 79
    • Reputation: +0/-1
    • Gender: Male
    ELEISON 379 - OCTOBER 18, 2014
    « Reply #220 on: October 26, 2014, 07:47:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Matthew
    Quote from: cantatedomino
    They deleted my post!!!!!

    Ha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


    You're right.

    1. There's no "they" -- just me. It's a monarchy, not an oligarchy or a committee.

    2. As a corollary, if you ever see red ink in a post, you can automatically assume it's me.

    I won't have hatred spewed at any consecrated man of God on my forum. This is a Traditional Catholic forum. Hating bishops isn't Catholic. To allow it, I'd be approving of it, and I'd have to answer at MY judgment and it might cost me my salvation as well.

    I don't care what the Novus Ordo has done to Charity's good name, but the fact remains that we are under an obligation to be charitable to our fellow men, but especially those who bear the sacred character of the Priesthood.


    Bravo!

     :applause:


    Offline Adolphus

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 467
    • Reputation: +467/-6
    • Gender: Male
    ELEISON 379 - OCTOBER 18, 2014
    « Reply #221 on: October 26, 2014, 11:25:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    In our times there is a great danger, my dear brethren, that threatens all of us traditionalists a little, we who call ourselves traditionalists, who rightly wish to keep the Tradition. There is a danger that threatens us, because the authorities in Rome, failing to do their duty, as it were, are no longer doing anything, in a mysterious, incomprehensible way, but they are no longer doing anything to truly condemn the errors, to condemn the doctrinal deviations of our faith. The Church no longer acts. Everyone is labouring in search of truth. The theologians, the priests, the bishops, are all in search of truth. And yet Rome says nothing. People can say anything; they can write anything, and there is nothing said except against the traditionalists.

    But this failure of the Authority of Rome is very serious. Because this puts us in a troubled situation, in a confused situation. No wonder that even amongst the traditionalists, we are like orphans without a father. The bishops no longer do anything, the bishops no longer lead us. They no longer tell us what we must do, where is the truth and where is the error, where is the good, and where is the evil. We no longer know, the people no longer know.

    So there is the tendency to be led towards this or that devotion, to be led towards this or that group who, they say, have relations with heaven, this or that person who has, they say, messages, another who would have particular inspirations. It is very dangerous. Why? Because when the bishops are there, when the bishops act as pastors of the flock, they watch. And if there is something in the flock, if a person comes to tell a bishop: I had special relations with the Blessed Virgin, the Blessed Virgin appeared to me, the Blessed Virgin told me this, Our Lord told me that, then the bishop says: well, we will examine this. I will name for you this or that canon lawyer, this or that theologian who will go to see you, who will question you, who will see if everything is correct. After six months, one year, or two years, after a very meticulous study, the bishop says yes or no. He gives a judgement. The faithful are led, they are protected.

    If the apparition is real, then there is no danger for the faith, if everything in it is conformed to our faith. But if it is not conformed to the faith, the bishop must protect the flock against these things that may be diabolical, because the demon knows very well how to imitate heaven and he fools us. Nowadays there is no longer anyone to guide us, no longer anyone to judge us, so people run here and there, now they hear a rumour, then again another rumour. When that happens, we must remember the words of Our Lord: “A day will come when they will tell you: Our Lord is in the desert, Our Lord is in the city, Our Lord is here, Our Lord is there. Do not go there”, Our Lord said this. And why should you not go there? Because you do not know, you could find yourself amongst the demons. Stay, therefore, in the faith. In our times, we must keep the faith.

    But where is the faith? In your catechism – it’s not difficult. Open your catechism, you have everything. The catechism is the way to heaven. It is your book that leads you to heaven. Take your Credo. You have the commandments of God and of the Church, you have the sacraments, the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, the Christian virtues, the Our Father, the devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary. With that you have everything. There is no need of anything else. That is the résumé of Tradition, it is the résumé of revelation, it is the résumé of Tradition and of the Scriptures. It is that which the apostles have put into our hands and which the bishops from generation to generation have given us. We must cling to this and beware of all the rest.

    We live in a time when the demon is more powerful than ever. So we must watch out. We must watch out for all those things which are a little extraordinary that could lead us this way and that way and that could make us forget what is essential, because the devil can distract us from the faith. He wants to deceive us, so he distracts us with one thing or another, and during that time, we do not do the work that we are supposed to do. We must therefore maintain our faith. That is what I would like the priory to be also: a house where the faith is maintained.

    Well then, do not be astonished if our priests are not always very enthusiastic over this or that so-called apparition, this or that place of pilgrimage. I am not speaking about the ancient shrines that have been confirmed by Tradition, such as St. Joseph in Montreal or the three great traditional shrines of Quebec. I am speaking of the new places of pilgrimage that all of a sudden spring out in one place, that are suddenly in another place, etc.


    Sermon of Archbishop Lefebvre on the occasion of the blessing of St. Pius X Priory in Shawinigan, November 8, 1977

    Offline Maria Auxiliadora

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1424
    • Reputation: +1360/-142
    • Gender: Female
    ELEISON 379 - OCTOBER 18, 2014
    « Reply #222 on: October 27, 2014, 06:25:10 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Adolphus
    Quote
    In our times there is a great danger, my dear brethren, that threatens all of us traditionalists a little, we who call ourselves traditionalists, who rightly wish to keep the Tradition. There is a danger that threatens us, because the authorities in Rome, failing to do their duty, as it were, are no longer doing anything, in a mysterious, incomprehensible way, but they are no longer doing anything to truly condemn the errors, to condemn the doctrinal deviations of our faith. The Church no longer acts. Everyone is labouring in search of truth. The theologians, the priests, the bishops, are all in search of truth. And yet Rome says nothing. People can say anything; they can write anything, and there is nothing said except against the traditionalists.

    But this failure of the Authority of Rome is very serious. Because this puts us in a troubled situation, in a confused situation. No wonder that even amongst the traditionalists, we are like orphans without a father. The bishops no longer do anything, the bishops no longer lead us. They no longer tell us what we must do, where is the truth and where is the error, where is the good, and where is the evil. We no longer know, the people no longer know.

    So there is the tendency to be led towards this or that devotion, to be led towards this or that group who, they say, have relations with heaven, this or that person who has, they say, messages, another who would have particular inspirations. It is very dangerous. Why? Because when the bishops are there, when the bishops act as pastors of the flock, they watch. And if there is something in the flock, if a person comes to tell a bishop: I had special relations with the Blessed Virgin, the Blessed Virgin appeared to me, the Blessed Virgin told me this, Our Lord told me that, then the bishop says: well, we will examine this. I will name for you this or that canon lawyer, this or that theologian who will go to see you, who will question you, who will see if everything is correct. After six months, one year, or two years, after a very meticulous study, the bishop says yes or no. He gives a judgement. The faithful are led, they are protected.

    If the apparition is real, then there is no danger for the faith, if everything in it is conformed to our faith. But if it is not conformed to the faith, the bishop must protect the flock against these things that may be diabolical, because the demon knows very well how to imitate heaven and he fools us. Nowadays there is no longer anyone to guide us, no longer anyone to judge us, so people run here and there, now they hear a rumour, then again another rumour. When that happens, we must remember the words of Our Lord: “A day will come when they will tell you: Our Lord is in the desert, Our Lord is in the city, Our Lord is here, Our Lord is there. Do not go there”, Our Lord said this. And why should you not go there? Because you do not know, you could find yourself amongst the demons. Stay, therefore, in the faith. In our times, we must keep the faith.

    But where is the faith? In your catechism – it’s not difficult. Open your catechism, you have everything. The catechism is the way to heaven. It is your book that leads you to heaven. Take your Credo. You have the commandments of God and of the Church, you have the sacraments, the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, the Christian virtues, the Our Father, the devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary. With that you have everything. There is no need of anything else. That is the résumé of Tradition, it is the résumé of revelation, it is the résumé of Tradition and of the Scriptures. It is that which the apostles have put into our hands and which the bishops from generation to generation have given us. We must cling to this and beware of all the rest.

    We live in a time when the demon is more powerful than ever. So we must watch out. We must watch out for all those things which are a little extraordinary that could lead us this way and that way and that could make us forget what is essential, because the devil can distract us from the faith. He wants to deceive us, so he distracts us with one thing or another, and during that time, we do not do the work that we are supposed to do. We must therefore maintain our faith. That is what I would like the priory to be also: a house where the faith is maintained.

    Well then, do not be astonished if our priests are not always very enthusiastic over this or that so-called apparition, this or that place of pilgrimage. I am not speaking about the ancient shrines that have been confirmed by Tradition, such as St. Joseph in Montreal or the three great traditional shrines of Quebec. I am speaking of the new places of pilgrimage that all of a sudden spring out in one place, that are suddenly in another place, etc.


    Sermon of Archbishop Lefebvre on the occasion of the blessing of St. Pius X Priory in Shawinigan, November 8, 1977


    True. No argument. But who in the SSPX would have imagined in 2008, after the 2006 General Chapter, that +Fellay would betray the GC declarations and go for a practical agreement? And what happened to the SSPX since?
    The love of God be your motivation, the will of God your guiding principle, the glory of God your goal.
    (St. Clement Mary Hofbauer)

    Offline Adolphus

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 467
    • Reputation: +467/-6
    • Gender: Male
    ELEISON 379 - OCTOBER 18, 2014
    « Reply #223 on: October 27, 2014, 08:25:11 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • «True. No argument. But who in the SSPX would have imagined in 2008, after the 2006 General Chapter, that +Fellay would betray the GC declarations and go for a practical agreement? And what happened to the SSPX since?»

    In 2008?  By that time, more than one priest had had problems for resisting Bp. Fellay.

    Remember the great lie at Flavigny...