I would hope a discussion could include worldwide resistance,
Of course! I was trying to narrow the focus a bit, but most things would apply worldwide.
Perhaps there needs to be clarification of what is "danger to Faith". That seems to be so loosely applied to situations where someone may simply have a beef with a priest or the parish as a whole rather than "If I continue on here we will all into impurity, heresy, schism, apostasy, etc..."
When we talk about "danger to the Faith", there are short-term dangers and also long-term dangers. So, I'd roughly put issues into 3 categories:
1) short-term dangers
(nonfictional) example: your priest has a policy of no Extreme Unction if requested by someone who regularly attends Resistance Masses
one appropriate response: keep your family away, this is a sign of cult mentality and a complete disagreement with the purpose of the Resistance which is nothing more than keeping the Faith in a setting sufficiently distant from the dangerous Novus Ordo
2) long-term dangers
example: the organization operating your chapel (SSPX) has no problem concelebrating Masses with diocesan priests and otherwise watering down the dangers of the Novus Ordo and the Roman hierarchy
one appropriate response: attend Mass for the sacraments, limit your involvement,
actively work to establish a more solid option in your area 3) not a danger
(fictional) example: Father announced the adding of new handicapped parking spaces and informed me that I'd have to park elsewhere ... I've been parking in that spot for 20 years! I'm outta here!
one appropriate response: Get over it!
That's how I see things and this thread is intended to discuss the part I bolded. What do you think? Would you define things differently?