Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Pope has approved the consecration of two bishops in the SSPX  (Read 10598 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Pope has approved the consecration of two bishops in the SSPX
« Reply #10 on: January 12, 2019, 01:49:06 PM »
So, these two bishops-- NO assigned by Francis? Or from priests already within the SSPX? Or am I misunderstanding?
No, most likely, they (the future bishops) would be SSPX priests, approved by the Superior General and Counsel and submitted to Rome for final approval. Similar to what Bishop Fellay described in his Aug. 2016 New Zealand conference. (if you have not seen it, please do, specifically part 6, it is an important conferences. Bishop Fellay gave the entire plan that we see unfolding these past two years. I think he may have given too much information (with too much enthusiasm) as that conference was never widely publicized or quoted by the SSPX media outlets ever since.

Re: Pope has approved the consecration of two bishops in the SSPX
« Reply #11 on: January 12, 2019, 10:25:44 PM »
Apparently, the SSPX teaches that it is a society of priests and brothers under Rome, and that the laity are just sheep without any say because the laity do not belong to the SSPX. Yet, the laity must pay tithes to support the SSPX, and if they do not, then they will not receive any services or sacraments. Furthermore, any SSPX parishes, schools, and/or rectories must be deeded by the laity over to the SSPX who must retain title if any sacraments are desired. Therefore, all this real estate can be sold at any time to benefit the SSPX with the request that the laity must locate and build new churches and buildings if they want to receive any sacraments from the SSPX.

As a result, the society, like parents, do not feel any need to advise the laity, their minor children, of anything they do. After all, the SSPX is a private corporation. Therefore, the SSPX does not have any obligation to reveal any legal agreements with Rome to the laity, and the laity are expected to be silent and obedient, to mind their own business, and not to pry into the dealings of the SSPX.

Yes, the sheep must obediently follow their shepherds and must not question anything, even if they are being led over a cliff.



As a result, those laity who stand up from the crowd and resist will be disciplined and silenced by the SSPX.

Apparently, the SSPX teaches that it is a society of priests and brothers under Rome, and that the laity are just sheep without any say because the laity do not belong to the SSPX. Yet, the laity must pay tithes to support the SSPX, and if they do not, then they will not receive any services or sacraments. Furthermore, any SSPX parishes, schools, and/or rectories must be deeded by the laity over to the SSPX who must retain title if any sacraments are desired. Therefore, all this real estate can be sold at any time to benefit the SSPX with the request that the laity must locate and build new churches and buildings if they want to receive any sacraments from the SSPX.

As a result, the society, like parents, do not feel any need to advise the laity, their minor children, of anything they do. After all, the SSPX is a private corporation. Therefore, the SSPX does not have any obligation to reveal any legal agreements with Rome to the laity, and the laity are expected to be silent and obedient, to mind their own business, and not to pry into the dealings of the SSPX.

Yes, the sheep must obediently follow their shepherds and must not question anything, even if they are being led over a cliff.



As a result, those laity who stand up from the crowd and resist will be disciplined and silenced by the SSPX.
At our sspx parish it was made known to the priest that some have been attending a resistance mass,as a result he has expelled a few parishoners, one being in the choir, another an alter boy


Re: Pope has approved the consecration of two bishops in the SSPX
« Reply #12 on: January 12, 2019, 11:59:53 PM »
We should develop a list of SSPX priests with potential for the "Pope Bergolio's" stamp of approval.

The one who immediately come to mind for me:


    Father Christian Bouchacourt

The SSPX priests who are chosen by the Destroyer Pope, to be Bishops will surely suffer much.


Re: Pope has approved the consecration of two bishops in the SSPX
« Reply #13 on: January 13, 2019, 12:13:02 AM »
Where I live, anyone who is a member of a SSPX parish is considered to be a non Catholic and treated as such. 

Re: Pope has approved the consecration of two bishops in the SSPX
« Reply #14 on: January 13, 2019, 07:52:18 AM »
We should develop a list of SSPX priests with potential for the "Pope Bergolio's" stamp of approval.

The one who immediately come to mind for me:


    Father Christian Bouchacourt

The SSPX priests who are chosen by the Destroyer Pope, to be Bishops will surely suffer much.
I think of "Monsignor" James Byrnes of Ridgefield, CT (formerly Novus Ordo).