Author Topic: Pope Francis forbids SSPX priests to say Mass (Read 9302 times)

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #30 on:** October 29, 2014, 01:52:49 PM »

.

Ambiguity in action, the unclean spirit of Vat.II in progress..........

Quote

He mentions also a Catholic priest and a Lutheran pastor who were killed on the same day by the nαzιs for teaching the Catechism to children.

Who's willing to BET that the "catechism" the Catholic priest was teaching from was not the same "catechism" that the Lutheran minister was teaching from? (Remember, this was WWII, 20 years before Vat.II) Consequently, if the Catholic priest was teaching the truth and the Lutheran was teaching heresy, their respective deaths would have an entirely different and SEPARATE connotation and significance in the eyes of God. And therefore it would be the pope's obligation to clarify this truth, and it would be to his great malfeasance for him to obfuscate it.

But 'true' to the false and nefarious principles of false ecuмenism, differences in doctrine are swept under the rug, because mentioning that is "divisive," and in true Freemasonic fashion, both "catechisms" are held high overhead and carried around ceremonially, even while neither book is ever cracked open.

They don't crack the book and they don't read from it.

The Freemasons call it "the book" and it matters not (they claim at the lowest levels) what book it is. It could be a catechism, it could be a Bible, it could be a тαℓмυd, it could be a Torah*, it could be a Koran or a Bhagavad Gita, but they conspicuously forget to mention that it could also be LaVey's Satanic Bible (which is what they use in the highest levels, and in those ceremonies, they DO crack open the book and they DO read from it.

*Or, as the Japanese had been wont to say, TORA! TORA! TORA! ( トラ・トラ・トラ )
.

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #31 on:** October 30, 2014, 01:18:45 PM »

.

Vocabulary:

Suburbicarian Diocese of Albano

Albano Laziale

the Pastoral Note on the Society of Saint Pius X of [former bishop of Albano] Dante Bernini

Albano Chancery, October 14, 2014, Prot. 235/14.*

+ Marcello Semeraro, Bishop

the above-mentioned "Society" is not an institution (neither parish, nor association) of the Catholic Church.

Benedict XVI's Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church of March 10, 2009:
"the Society has no canonical status in the Church, and its ministers – even though they have been freed of the ecclesiastical penalty – do not legitimately exercise any ministry in the Church." (in AAS CI [2009], n. 4, p. 272).

The same Benedict XVI, in the following Letter m. p. Ecclesiae Unitatem, of July 2, 2009, added: "the remission of the excommunication was a measure taken in the context of ecclesiastical discipline to free the individuals from the burden of conscience constituted by the most serious of ecclesiastical penalties. However, the doctrinal questions obviously remain and until they are clarified the Society has no canonical status in the Church and its ministers cannot legitimately exercise any ministry." (in AAS CI [2009], p. 710-711).

The Catholic faithful cannot participate at Mass, neither request and/or receive Sacraments from or in the Society. Acting otherwise would mean to break communion with the Catholic Church.

any Catholic faithful who requests and receives Sacraments in the Society of Saint Pius X, will place himself de facto in the condition of no longer being in communion with the Catholic Church.

It is sincerely saddening [for whom?] that such options [measures] ... be in constrast [contrast?] with the pastoral orientations of the Italian Church

formative paths for the growth and maturation of the life of faith are favored in the Diocese of Albano [however, nevertheless, no evidence of same is forthcoming]

*HEY! It has a protocol number! It must be the official teaching of the Church! Notify Fr. Dominic immediately! Oh, right, this is after Vat.II so it's not the Church anymore. I almost forgot.

.

Francisco · « **Reply #32 on:** November 01, 2014, 01:30:51 AM »

Towards the end of Episode 8 of Francis Watch,
http://www.restorationradionetwork.org/season-3-francis-watch-episode-8-bergoglio-says-god-does-not-exist/
Bishop Sanborn speculates that there may well be Vatican pressure on the SSPX to jump off the fence into the Conciliar Church, or to face excommunications again. Hence the Mueller-SSPX meeting in September, followed by this October statement of the Bishop of Albano concerning the Society.

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #33 on:** November 06, 2014, 08:13:08 AM »

Quote from: Francisco

Towards the end of Episode 8 of Francis Watch,
http://www.restorationradionetwork.org/season-3-francis-watch-episode-8-bergoglio-says-god-does-not-exist/
Bishop Sanborn speculates that there may well be Vatican pressure on the SSPX to jump off the fence into the Conciliar Church, or to face excommunications again. Hence the Mueller-SSPX meeting in September, followed by this October statement of the Bishop of Albano concerning the Society.

Totally!

Seems to me +Fellay has really "stepped in it" this time.

EEEEwww. Gag me with a spoon. Fer-sher.

.

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #34 on:** November 06, 2014, 08:18:00 AM »

.

Woops. I left out a close-parenthesis. I fixed it here:

Quote from: Neil Obstat

.

Ambiguity in action, the unclean spirit of Vat.II in progress..........

Quote

He mentions also a Catholic priest and a Lutheran pastor who were killed on the same day by the nαzιs for teaching the Catechism to children.

Who's willing to BET that the "catechism" the Catholic priest was teaching from was not the same "catechism" that the Lutheran minister was teaching from? (Remember, this was WWII, 20 years before Vat.II) Consequently, if the Catholic priest was teaching the truth and the Lutheran was teaching heresy, their respective deaths would have an entirely different and SEPARATE connotation and significance in the eyes of God. And therefore it would be the pope's obligation to clarify this truth, and it would be to his great malfeasance for him to obfuscate it.

But 'true' to the false and nefarious principles of false ecuмenism, differences in doctrine are swept under the rug, because mentioning that is "divisive," and in true Freemasonic fashion, both "catechisms" are held high overhead and carried around ceremonially, even while neither book is ever cracked open.

They don't crack the book and they don't read from it.

The Freemasons call it "the book" and it matters not (they claim at the lowest levels) what book it is. It could be a catechism, it could be a Bible, it could be a тαℓмυd, it could be a Torah*, it could be a Koran or a Bhagavad Gita, but they conspicuously forget to mention that it could also be LaVey's Satanic Bible (which is what they use in the highest levels, and in those ceremonies, they DO crack open the book and they DO read from it).

*Or, as the Japanese had been wont to say, TORA! TORA! TORA! ( トラ・トラ・トラ )

.

Quiz question: Can you find it? :reading:

.