No, I'm not. It's a valid question and I did not mean it
in any way to make some larger opinion at all.
- not a Bishop of Rome.
- not a Bishop of SSPX (a.k.a. Rome according to most of you)
a Bishop of WHAT ? with jurisdiction over WHOM ?
Now we know you're a troll.
You think we're "Lefebvrists" whose See is in Menzingen, and whose pope is +Fellay.
You don't understand Tradition at all. You are a fish out of water on a Trad forum, and you come across as such.
If a consecrator did pretend to confer jursidiction, it would be a schismatic act.
You can only have one Bishop in a given diocese -- at least if you restrict yourself to the Catholic Church. To have two bishops claim jurisdiction in one geographic location, that would only be possible if you had two churches (one of them schismatic).
But these bishops were consecrated only for the needs of the Faithful -- the needs of Tradition to continue -- so these bishops could confer Confirmations and Ordination as necessary. In short, so Tradition could continue for the duration of this Crisis in the Church.
There. I gave you the benefit of the doubt that you were merely ignorant about it. Everyone else here already knows this.
Topic: Pictures from the Consecration (Read 5198 times)