It's a pathetic attempt at mockery of the "recognize and resist" position.
Totally wrong. It has nothing to do with R&R. It appears that you have been made very touchy on the subject of R&R.
You are not the one joining Rome, you are not even an SSPXer anymore. If the SSPX continues on its present trajectory it will lose the second R.
How many of the SSPX laity and priests have pictures of the Vatican II popes in their homes and offices? I doubt a one has one. How can this be, if they want to join Bergolio?
First of all, please dispense with the BS. That's a classic bully tactic. A bully will push and torment someone every day, until one day the victim snaps and just punches him. At that point the bully feigns innocence and pretends as if he is the victim, and his victim started it. He will even taunt back aloud, "Whoah, man, you have some anger management issues! What's your problem?"
In other words, Sede vs. R&R is a frequent argument here on CathInfo, a forum on which I allow sedevacantists. So you better believe I'm a bit touchy, like a man in the trenches who's used to shooting at others and being shot at every day.
Anyhow, moving on to the main point of my response --
True, I'm not with the neo-SSPX. And it's also true that they are fast losing the "resist" portion of the equation. Hence the need for the Resistance, to keep the classic SSPX position alive somewhere.
I suppose some of the neo-SSPX laity are just following the leader -- Bishop Fellay. They are too apathetic to put themselves out about anything. They want no inconveniences, including staying informed, looking up anything, or thinking for themselves.
They can't be arsed to drive an extra 30 minutes to a Resistance Mass center. True story; I have proof! There is a permanent Resistance chapel 40 minutes from the San Antonio SSPX chapel, and yet almost NO ONE from that chapel even comes to the Resistance chapel nearby, even on an occasional basis. Pure apathy.