CathInfo.com

Pablo made a bold, unusual, extraordinary slander against Fr. Voigt: namely, that he had put a curse on his son, causing his son's eventual death.

Interestingly, I have long held the view that ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity (especially male) is the result of diabolical activity.  So perhaps Pablo's dabbling with the dark forces caused fallout against his family.

I believe that a lot of female ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is more emotional in nature, i.e. happening in women who have experienced issues being able to bond with men (rejected, abused, etc.).  Female ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is much less about sex.  Male ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is nearly always rooted in sɛҳuąƖ perversion and impurity.  Of course these are generalizations.  So, for instance, it's much less repugnant to see two women kiss one another than to see two men do it, since for the women it's much more an emotional thing.  Mothers, for instance, tend to kiss their children more, boys and girls, on the lips ... whereas men do that less often, and rarely with boys once they reach a certain age.  It's due to the fact that for women it's emotional, whereas with men it's more physical.

Interestingly, the ancient Greeks claimed that male ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity was superior even to heterosɛҳuąƖ relations because the relationship between two men would be more intellectual.  Of course, you rarely see male ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity these days being an intellectual bond.

So, to answer your question, the male ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is a much greater perversion contrary to nature than the female ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity.  I do not base this on anything more than a gut sense about it.