Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 45 46 [47] 48 49 ... 68

Author Topic: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post)  (Read 39260 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Croixalist

Re: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post)
« Reply #230 on: April 29, 2019, 12:49:36 PM »
Quote from: Meg on April 29, 2019, 12:35:19 PM
Sounds reasonable to me. But it can be difficult to admit that one has been very wrong, and to apologize for it.

That's very true. Until his rhetoric changes from "you don't know me" and "you can't make me" to "I should have listened to the alarm and acted sooner" and replaces his habit of deflection into complete transparency, then he might have turned the corner. Right now all we have are anonymous accounts where we could really benefit from a name attached to them. Martin could still be that guy, but he's already used the excuse that he wouldn't want anything tainted on these horrible horrible forums that he is compelled to post on. He will put out personal details for what remains of Pablo's reputation, which speaks volumes as to how far he hasn't come. Admitting to mere flaws or unspecific mistakes won't do it in the confessional and surprise surprise, doesn't go very far here.


Quote from: Ladislaus on April 29, 2019, 12:48:11 PM
With each and every absurd post (see my previous lengthy post explaining how Catholicus' story has largely been corroborated, while your gratuitous denials are not credible and lose more and more credibility with each post) ... you become more and more complicit in Pablo's crimes.

It's completely absurd this has to be explained, but here we are yet again!
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post)
« Reply #231 on: April 29, 2019, 12:51:30 PM »
Quote from: Incredulous on April 29, 2019, 11:41:29 AM

As Catholicus stated, everyone on the farm is affected by the warlock' spell.

It sounds like that everyone includes Martin ... who still hasn't shake free.
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post)
« Reply #232 on: April 29, 2019, 01:03:08 PM »
Quote from: ManuelChavez on April 29, 2019, 12:56:05 PM
Each testimony is separate and unique. A valid and detailed testimony should not be used to validate a lie. It diminishes the value of the true testimony.
Seraphina’s testimony is clear in all its details. It is level-headed and fair. It has time, setting, and people. It can be easily verified.
Catholicus can’t do any of that, and when asked, the writer refused.

Indeed, but read again how much of Catholicus' story has in fact been verified.  You keep ignoring that.  Ignore if you will the parts that have not been verified, the soup incident, etc.  But EVEN IF YOU TAKE THAT OUT, the case against Pablo is damning.  Then combined the corroborated parts of Catholicus' story with Seraphina's account, and a picture emerges.

You believe Seraphina, and didn't ask her details to verify her story.  Why?  You tipped your hand when you dismissed occult practices as "mumbo jumbo".  Seraphina's you find credible, whereas Catholicus' do not ... both for no reasons other than your emotions.  Why didn't you grill Seraphina about the color of the bath robe, details about exactly when the fake blessing incident took place, etc.?
Logged

Offline Meg

Re: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post)
« Reply #233 on: April 29, 2019, 01:04:09 PM »
Quote from: Croixalist on April 29, 2019, 12:49:36 PM
That's very true. Until his rhetoric changes from "you don't know me" and "you can't make me" to "I should have listened to the alarm and acted sooner" and replaces his habit of deflection into complete transparency, then he might have turned the corner. Right now all we have are anonymous accounts where we could really benefit from a name attached to them. Martin could still be that guy, but he's already used the excuse that he wouldn't want anything tainted on these horrible horrible forums that he is compelled to post on. He will put out personal details for what remains of Pablo's reputation, which speaks volumes as to how far he hasn't come. Admitting to mere flaws or unspecific mistakes won't do it in the confessional and surprise surprise, doesn't go very far here.


It's completely absurd this has to be explained, but here we are yet again!

Agreed; a persons' credibility can be called into question if he or she does not admit to very serious mistakes of the past, and present.
It seems that that place can have a strong affect on those who have been involved in it. People don't always easily shake off the effects of being involved in a cult - especially with the likes of Pablo. Maybe prayer and fasting for the intention of separating Pablo from Boston Kentucky and Fr. Pfeiffer would be a good thing - though maybe that's already been tried.
Logged

Offline Croixalist

Re: Pfeifferville is a warlock's lair (re-post)
« Reply #234 on: April 29, 2019, 01:06:15 PM »
Quote from: ManuelChavez on April 29, 2019, 12:45:57 PM
Catholicus’ testimony, and the rabid defense of it, reminds me a lot of the case of “Bishop” Ambrose, with some posters of CathInfo filling in for the supporters of Ambrose (with myself in the initial stages, I am sorry to say).
But of course, this story is against Pablo, so it gets a pass. Pablo is a bad guy, so even if this story is absolutely falsified, we can still use it to highlight the evils of Pablo and Boston.
I am not defending Pablo or the seminary.
CathInfo, for better or worse, is the largest site for the resistance. It has some pull in the field. As such, there ought to be a certain accountability when it comes to making accusations, and there should be room for questioning those accusations, as well as asking for proof of those accusations.
Otherwise, you are only discrediting CathInfo while giving Boston more ammunition for their worldwide machinations.

Imagine the hypocrisy of demanding accountability while assuming none of it yourself. You refuse to realize your weak admissions of weakness don't begin to cover your involvement in all this. The best thing anyone can do here to elevate their claims is to release their full names and move forward with all allegations. You could be the first since Fr. Voigt to do that, you could have been an example. You reluctance to share your full testimony could mean any number of things but it certainly doesn't inspire anyone else who might have something important to say from officially standing by their account. I'll tell you what I think it looks like, it looks like everyone is in fear of reprisals from you-know-who.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 45 46 [47] 48 49 ... 68
« previous next »