Manuel's argument

The 10 participants in this thread disagree with me
But I am a saint, as well as infallible, incapable of being deceived.
Therefore, the 10 participants in this thread are evil.

Then:

The 10 participants in this thread are evil.
The other 3,714 CathInfo members (everyone except me) must agree with them. Because that's the feeling I get.
Therefore the whole forum is evil.

I don’t know if this is related but a couple of years ago I was present for a conversation where Fr Pfeiffer was telling a group of people not to use the St Benedict Medal Crucifix. He said that the medal placed on those crosses was above the Body of Jesus and implied St. Benedict had more importance over Christ. I’ve always wondered about this and where Fr P got the idea from. I’ve never heard any other priest say this.

I'm confused by the above. Shouldn't you have said "the crosses placed on those medals"?

What then, would cause a person like Fr Pfeiffer to progressively cut himself off from essentially every other Resistance personality out there, to savage +Williamson repeatedly, and, above all, to continue against best advice to cavort with Mr. Moran, to destroy so many relationships etc.?
Like I said, we can rule out improper seminary formation or training. We can likely rule out lack of intellect, as he is a reasonably smart man. We can (probably) rule out mental illness....what are the remaining explanations? The fact is that his behaviour is far beyond the spectrum of normal.
If not straight up possession, then some sort of oppression or diabolical influence honestly seems to be the most compelling explanation at this point.

True as they may be (and I'm inclined to think that they are), we don't even need stories of moonlight woods or plastic bags of blood to reasonably suspect that something diabolical is going on at Boston...

Excellent post!

Focus on the money trail, the non-profit and the required docuмents and board needed for said purposes. Take a look at the books, and what others have given to the seminary.

Ok, Manuel, go ahead. We're waiting. If you have evidence of this sort, we're all ears. Let's have it. Otherwise, if you refuse to light a candle, please refrain from cursing the darkness.

Let's not forget the most plausible explanation: blackmail.

Yes, but as I've said many times, blackmail only works when the thing you're forced into (payoffs, forced behavior) is LESS THAN the damage that would be done if the blackmail victim's "deeds" were given a full public airing.

Say Joe Public had dirt on me, that could result in my going to jail for UP TO 30 days. He would never be able to force me into working full-time on his farm for free for a whole 3 months. Get it? I (hypothetically) would rather do the shorter jail time, which might even be less than 30 days.

But what if he had greater dirt on me, that could result in 10 years in a maximum security prison? Now that 3 months' free labor is looking like a bargain. Capiche?

Now when you factor in how great the evils are that Fr. Pfeiffer is being forced into...  Attacking all other Resistance priests and bishops, embracing a con-artist like Ambrose Moran, associating with and promoting countless priests with "lavender" reputations, the destruction of souls in and around Boston, KY, the loss and damage to many vocations, destroying at least one Traditional Catholic marriage, countless spiritual harm -- the dirt Pablo would have to have on Fr. Pfeiffer would be mind-boggling. Because in this scenario, Fr. Pfeiffer would know just how wrong all this is! He knows the value of one soul, of one vocation. He knows the dignity of a priest and a bishop. The crimes being held over Fr. P's head would have to be heinous indeed -- along the lines of what the Clintons or Bushes are guilty of! (And by the way, I believe the Clintons are guilty of conspiracy, murder, treason, cнιℓd тrαffιcking, pedophilia, and sacrificing children to the devil.)

Blackmail sounds plausible, until you think about just how much Pablo has "forced" Fr. Pfeiffer into. No, I can't believe Fr. Pfeiffer had committed any crimes THAT serious pre-2012!

Yes, but as I've said many times, blackmail only works when the thing you're forced into (payoffs, forced behavior) is LESS THAN the damage that would be done if the blackmail victim's "deeds" were given a full public airing.

Say Joe Public had dirt on me, that could result in my going to jail for UP TO 30 days. He would never be able to force me into working full-time on his farm for free for a whole 3 months. Get it? I (hypothetically) would rather do the shorter jail time, which might even be less than 30 days.

But what if he had greater dirt on me, that could result in 10 years in a maximum security prison? Now that 3 months' free labor is looking like a bargain. Capiche?

Now when you factor in how great the evils are that Fr. Pfeiffer is being forced into...  Attacking all other Resistance priests and bishops, embracing a con-artist like Ambrose Moran, associating with and promoting countless priests with "lavender" reputations, the destruction of souls in and around Boston, KY, the loss and damage to many vocations, destroying at least one Traditional Catholic marriage, countless spiritual harm -- the dirt Pablo would have to have on Fr. Pfeiffer would be mind-boggling. Because in this scenario, Fr. Pfeiffer would know just how wrong all this is! He knows the value of one soul, of one vocation. He knows the dignity of a priest and a bishop. The crimes being held over Fr. P's head would have to be heinous indeed -- along the lines of what the Clintons or Bushes are guilty of! (And by the way, I believe the Clintons are guilty of conspiracy, murder, treason, cнιℓd тrαffιcking, pedophilia, and sacrificing children to the devil.)

Blackmail sounds plausible, until you think about just how much Pablo has "forced" Fr. Pfeiffer into. No, I can't believe Fr. Pfeiffer had committed any crimes THAT serious pre-2012!

I've considered the blackmail angle before. Here's why it doesn't make sense to me, or rather, here's why blackmail ALONE doesn't seem to be a plausible explanation:
Prior to 2012, Father Pfeiffer had a pretty good reputation within traditional circles. He came across as principled, upright, and generally a well balanced individual. I have to believe (maybe foolishly) that were Pablo to have some kind of dirt on him, Father Pfeiffer would realize that dragging so many souls down with him is simply not worth the price of silence. Easier said than done, perhaps, but generally speaking, I'd hope that a well formed traditional priest, especially one with a personality like Father Pfeiffer, would just tell Pablo "bite me" rather than risk the destruction of so many souls under his care.
For example, even if I had committed a heinous crime, I simply couldn't be blackmailed into renouncing the faith, or committing sacrilege, or deliberately missing Mass, or committing iconoclasm, etc. 
Can you imagine trying to blackmail Fr Pfeiffer into somehow saying a Novus Ordo Mass? No way! In the same way, I just can't see him being blackmailed into cavorting with Ambrose Moran, IF he was in his right mind. It would take some serious manipulation, particularly of the demonic sort, to get him to stoop to this level...