The fact that Pablo doesn't attend Mass is another huge red light.  Does he have some aversion to it?  He has made comments where he placed Traditional Catholics below Satan.  Now, what is his business being so intimately involved with a Traditional Catholic group if he has such contempt for them?  Nothing adds up here ... but the witchcraft explanation would go a long way to making sense of everything.

^^^ This.

Does Pablo have an aversion to Holy Water?
Does he have an aversion to the Holy Cross?
Does he avoid making the Sign of the Cross?
Those would be huge red flags.

Let's hope and pray that Pablo has never influenced Fr. Pfeiffer to the extent that he has disclosed things to him that he has heard under the Seal of Confession.  That said, I'd nevertheless actually be surprised if Pablo has not tried on more than one occasion to get Fr. Pfeiffer to break the Seal.

^^^ This is exactly the ploy of communists and freemasons.
They want to destroy priests.

How does a person get the ability to turn the lights on and off (if he does not use any technical tricks)?
He snapped his fingers and the light went off, he snapped again and the light went on.
Another time he snapped his fingers and the WIFI connection turned off, he snapped again and it turned on. The WIFI router is in the priests house but it works also outside the house and we were standing outside in front of the door and he said I should connect my smartphone to the internet using WIFI as I did before, and then he told me to see what he is able to do. So he snapped his fingers and it stopped to work. The WIFI connection turned off. He did it 4 times, and as he snapped it turned on or off. His words about it: "WITCHCRAFT!" and he smiled.
Was it a joke? I thought it was just power games and nothing else....
But I also asked myself how can a human have such a power by snapping his fingers?

We need to pray for the priests, and seminarians, for all who seek the true Catholic faith and for our resistance bishops.

This no magic power, demonic or otherwise!  Heard of Alexa?  Way back in the 80s and 90s, there was a device advertised on late-night infomercials called The Clapper.  It turned things on and off in response to clapping, snapping fingers, voice commands.  Does this Pablo character wear a smart watch, carry a cell phone?  If so, he's taking advantage of you.  Remember, the magicians of Pharaoh were able to replicate the rod and snake "trick." 

I remember that dog. It died. 

Pablo liked that dog. He did not kill it, nor was it sacrificed to the gods. 

I remember the deaths of a few animals, including one dog that was shot by a neighbor, and one that was hit by a car. Another one was killed by an animal trap set up by a seminarian. None of these deaths can be attributed to the demonic. 

The bonfires were to allow the seminarians to relax after the day, and before lights out. It was not some ritualistic devil worship. It was a fire pit, and nothing more. 

Some people just want to think the absolute worst of others, and so they turn the smallest things into the greatest evils known to man, as long as it fits their own agendas.

There are other, more easily docuмented and verifiable issues with Boston. One needn’t meddle with heresay and second-hand rumors from those with an axe to grind. 

You can take the man out of Pfeifferville but you can't take the Pfeifferville out of the man. Simple questions, answers one, goes on a pointless meditation about "agendas" for the rest of his post. I could set a watch to your absurdity Manuel. After all this time, you can scarcely contribute anything on here unless it's yet another defense of the indefensible.

I am apt to believe Catholicus but if we're really expected to get serious about this account, we will need a real name. I can sympathize not wanting to give that information out, but I think that's the only way Manuel's objections could be solidly rebuffed as he is setting himself up as quite the expert in all things Pfeiffer. You must regret that now, huh Manuel? 

It's a good idea not to get too carried away with any one account though. What we know already is bad enough. 

This no magic power, demonic or otherwise!  Heard of Alexa?  Way back in the 80s and 90s, there was a device advertised on late-night infomercials called The Clapper.  It turned things on and off in response to clapping, snapping fingers, voice commands.  Does this Pablo character wear a smart watch, carry a cell phone?  If so, he's taking advantage of you.  Remember, the magicians of Pharaoh were able to replicate the rod and snake "trick."

Indeed, but as has been pointed out, the more disturbing part was that Pablo attributed this trick to "witchcraft" ... and taken in conjunction with his nickname of "El Brujo" and all the other things we've heard about him, there's a disturbing picture emerging.

I don’t have to support lies and exaggerations of he truth. 

I support the truth, and the fullness of the truth. Only in the truth, will we be set free from the errors and the evils done in Boston Kentucky. 

I have found other eyewitness accounts to be exaggerated, even of the events in which I was physically present and witnessed. This includes the situation of Father Voigt locking the priest’s house, as well as the subsequent break-in. 

I was there for some of the fire pit usage. I never witnessed any evil doings there. I also trust my brother’s eye witness accounts of the fire pit as well. My brother has not lied about or exaggerated the events he has witnessed. 

As for the hound, I do not remember the exact cause of death. I remember other dogs and their causes of death, none of which were diabolical in nature. 

The idea of raising animals was introduced by the parents of a seminarian. These same parents wanted more livestock at the seminary, which was never fully realized. 

As for Catholicus’ “story”, it reads like someone who has read the other tales on Cathinfo, and crafted a new one based on the other stories, both real and exaggerated. 

Carpet burns are easy to find, and I can produce photos of the carpet area should Catholicus remember where they occurred. 

Pablo never had photos hanging up in either of the rooms he used in the priest’s house. He hardly cleaned up, and he left junk all over the place, even in the rooms. He could not simply “hide” the witchcraft stuff under the bed or in the closets (there are no closet doors in the rooms). 

Incredulous’ questions are a mixture of specific and general. The questions of the hound are specific, the fire pit is general, and cover a decent amount of time. The fire pit was there for at least a year, during the rebuilding of one of the houses by a lay worker there. He used the fire pit more than anyone else, as he lived in the house right next to it. 

Who paid for the dog? Someone. Where did it come from? Somewhere. 

It could have been paid for using seminary funds. I do not know. I never asked Pablo who paid for the dog. I never felt the need to micromanage all his expenditures. 

“Obviously healthy” is an assumption, not by any means a certainty. 

As for the accusation of me defending Boston, or still being a part of Boston, or anything on that line, those accusations are unjust and incorrect. We terminated the mission here in February of 2017, after a series of heated discussions with Father Pfeiffer and Pablo. We have not invited him back. The many reasons for this are a family matter, and I will respect the privacy of my sisters and their respective families and experiences. 

We don’t need rumors. We don’t need second hand and heresay. While the clowns and jokers argue about the truthful tidbits, which are swathed in the quasi-real and the entirely fabricated, there is a wealth of real, tangible, docuмented and actionable evidence. 

Much like going after Capone for not paying his taxes, these real and docuмented issues can do much for the cause, yet they are being hampered by these tales of mythical misery and woe, which are time and again being uncovered as either stretches of the truth or complete fabrications, such as the one Matthew mentioned in this thread (I was also against that one, and was insulted in the process for that one as well; how little do things change...).