"St Paul",

1. I was talking about the bishop's normal attire and where he lives, not where the ordination took place. I clarified this in my post.
2. "You read that I ban people based on emotions" -- First of all, you should stop reading those dead, washed up tiny forums that are full of bitter ex-CathInfo members, Pfeifferites and other blind guides. Looking at your posting history, you mostly criticize Pfeifferism, which is good. I just don't understand what you have against Bp. Zendejas.
3. My knowledge of your opinion of Bp. Z comes from your voting history. Yes, I can and DO look this up when I see anomalous behavior (someone downthumbing every post in a thread, for example -- this mostly depends on the thread topic in question), just like I moderate and check the identity of many posts in the Anonymous subforum. The whole CathInfo forum is subject to moderation, though I do respect members privacy when they talk about personal sins or other private matters in the Anonymous subforum. (After all, that's what it was created for.) I don't want to know who is guilty of having a girlfriend abort their baby, for example.

but most important of all, I have to repeat ONCE AGAIN:

If you can find me one, JUST ONE forum *anywhere on the Internet, on any topic* with more than 150 members that allows members to insult the moderator(s), the forum itself, the entire forum membership, and/or the owner*, then I will button my lip and give you carte blanche to say anything and everything about me on CathInfo for the next 50 years. Deal?

I first gave this ultimatum probably 7 years ago -- I'm still waiting! So good luck finding a forum that won't ban you if you insult the forum authority(ies) or moderator(s).

You like those small Pfeifferite forums? How about you sign up for a new account on one of them, and have your first new topic be, "You're all a bunch of Pfeifferite Cult stooges" or "Want to see Fake Resistance? Look at those who reject the 4 Resistance Bishops" and see how long your account lasts.

I think you'll find that CathInfo's moderator has a long fuse compared to most other fora. You can't accuse me of excessive emotion, tyranny, mood swings, etc. when literally 100% of all forum owners behave the same way.

Come on, enemies! I've banned many people while giving them this offer. Why doesn't JUST ONE of them want to prove me wrong? Am I right after all? I guess I'm right after all.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* for example, calling them nαzιs, Hitler, tyrant, mortal sinner, demonic, heretic, fag, liar -- or whatever insults hold weight for the interest group in question.

I didn’t miss any point. I am concerned that your story does not add up, and that certain elements do not ring as true.

You were just a tolerated guest that  financially helped with his family for the existence of this jungle called "seminary".
So they certainly did not show and revealed you everything...
You did not live there permanently and you did not know what was going on there.
So do not talk about things you do not know. You can not judge other people's experiences. No matter who says something against this particular person that wants to be called "Pablo" & you go crazy. But sometimes you talk bad about Pablo, you do it only because you want to look like you do not like this person to be believable when you discredit others who have had bad experience.
Your comments are naive, you are determined by others

I am not there 24 hours a day.
My brother, on the other hand, is there every day. During that time, he has neither lied about nor misrepresented the situations in Boston.
Your story took place during or between my many visits to Boston. I know, either directly or through my brother, the conditions of the seminary during that time. Things didn’t change much between visits.
I did not judge, but I do doubt many of the events listed therein, as either exaggerations/misrepresentations of true events or as fabrications.
Having been to Boston, it does raise many questions (some of which would seem irrelevant to those who are not familiar with the area around Boston, or my experiences there):
What restaurant did you go to? What city?
What “Dallas” numbers called you? When?
Where in the carpet were the burns? Which building? Which floor?
When did this take place? How long a time period are we talking about?
I’ll give you the benefit of some doubt, if you can answer these questions.

It does not make sense to talk to you because you are not neutral!
The money of your family make it possible that this "seminary" exists.
You should maybe go back to this "seminary" and become a priest there, because as you say, it is so wonderful there, they are catholic, there is nothing diabolic.... You are so blind, more blind than many others of this sect.
I´am sure you will find your place and "mission" there and if it´s not to become a priest you can become a reporter ;-)) Hei, you can turn your hobby into a job there :applause:

But do not forget that one day you have to take your accountability to God.
Do you know that the donors are responsible for keeping seminarians in the illusion to become a catholic priest and to fight the good fight?
And can you accept that with your donation (the help of your family) your brother loses his youth and possibly his vocation (if he has one) or even his soul?
Do you know that donors are responsible for the many families who lose faith or are kept away from the sacraments because they were scared off??
Matthew 18:6
Causing to Stumble
“If anyone causes one of these little ones—those who believe in me—to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea."

You and your family make it possible by donating money and giving other kind of support, that this babylon and this inhumane system that you call "seminary" exists...
I know you do it with good intentions to do something good, but you have to wake up and choose to help the resistance bishops and their seminary for example.

I'm done with you, it's not worth talking to you.
We will pray for you and your brother.
God bless you!!
Take care

As an impartial observer, here are my thoughts:

I am not there 24 hours a day. 
My brother, on the other hand, is there every day. During that time, he has neither lied about nor misrepresented the situations in Boston. 
Your story took place during or between my many visits to Boston. I know, either directly or through my brother, the conditions of the seminary during that time. Things didn’t change much between visits.

I'm sorry, Manuel, but you're not an all-seeing oracle (and neither is your brother).  You can't know everything that is going on in all the different buildings, at all times.  And neither can your brother.  Not even parents know what their children are doing 24/7, in the same house!  You're not an expert on all things Pfeifferville.  For you to suggest as much, hurts your credibility.

Having been to Boston, it does raise many questions (some of which would seem irrelevant to those who are not familiar with the area around Boston, or my experiences there):
What restaurant did you go to? What city?
What “Dallas” numbers called you? When? 
Where in the carpet were the burns? Which building? Which floor? 
When did this take place? How long a time period are we talking about? 
I’ll give you the benefit of some doubt, if you can answer these questions.

If we were to spend the time to research the accusations, or if such accusations were brought before the court of law, the above questions are legitimate questions.  Catholicus, I'm not saying that you need to answer these questions, but before I could take your story seriously, you'd have to provide more details concerning the above.  My opinion doesn't matter; I'm just pointing out that your story needs more proof, since your accusations are quite serious.

As an impartial observer, here are my thoughts:
I'm sorry, Manuel, but you're not an all-seeing oracle (and neither is your brother).  You can't know everything that is going on in all the different buildings, at all times.  And neither can your brother.  Not even parents know what their children are doing 24/7, in the same house!  You're not an expert on all things Pfeifferville.  For you to suggest as much, hurts your credibility.

If we were to spend the time to research the accusations, or if such accusations were brought before the court of law, the above questions are legitimate questions.  Catholicus, I'm not saying that you need to answer these questions, but before I could take your story seriously, you'd have to provide more details concerning the above.  My opinion doesn't matter; I'm just pointing out that your story needs more proof, since your accusations are quite serious.

I said to much on this topic.

I will keep silent about it from now on. God's blessings to all of you. I´am finished.
Good Bye

For more infos:

• https://www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/nightmare-in-boston-lies-swindling-etc-by-pablo/
• https://secure.kentucky.gov/formservices/AttorneyGeneral/ConsumerComplaintForm

• https://www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/pablo-hitting-the-gas-full-throttle-in-slander-against-priests-and-bishops/
• https://www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/pablo-paul-hernandez-the-crisis-in-kentucky/

Well then!

That's interesting to say the least.

"Catholicus" is following the exact same M.O. that Constance did several years ago: giving a damning report about Boston, KY, but as soon as criticism is applied (as in Historical Criticism, or trying to verify the elements of the story) he gets nervous and dramatically declares that he is leaving the site forever.

And then he even links to Constance's story!

Color me suspicious.

Personally, I don't think it looks very good for his testimony being true. In fact, I'd have to say he must have made up the whole thing.

HOWEVER --

Please read my post (a few posts above) regarding how it DOESN'T MATTER if Catholicus' testimony is true or completely made up. There are already a mountain of good reasons to avoid Boston, KY, Fr. Pfeiffer, and Pablo like the plague. Why would we even need yet another reason?

And in my post (above) you will read that even the case for Pablo being a warlock is hardly destroyed if it turned out that Catholicus' testimony was false. There are still plenty of data points to raise legitimate suspicions on this heading.

Well then!

That's interesting to say the least.

"Catholicus" is following the exact same M.O. that Constance did several years ago: giving a damning report about Boston, KY, but as soon as criticism is applied (as in Historical Criticism, or trying to verify the elements of the story) he gets nervous and dramatically declares that he is leaving the site forever.

And then he even links to Constance's story!

Color me suspicious.

Personally, I don't think it looks very good for his testimony being true. In fact, I'd have to say he must have made up the whole thing.

HOWEVER --

Please read my post (a few posts above) regarding how it DOESN'T MATTER if Catholicus' testimony is true or completely made up. There are already a mountain of good reasons to avoid Boston, KY, Fr. Pfeiffer, and Pablo like the plague. Why would we even need yet another reason?

And in my post (above) you will read that even the case for Pablo being a warlock is hardly destroyed if it turned out that Catholicus' testimony was false. There are still plenty of data points to raise legitimate suspicions on this heading.

It is not right to judge others who bring out a warning because they see that there are still souls being destroyed there.
What I meant is that I'm done, that I´am finished to justify and repeat things.
I do not know who Constanze is but I discovered her testimony today and I believe her, I´am sure that she told us 100% truth.
That's why I had put the link. Do you have something special against this person? I know nothing about it. I´m sorry.
Her task was only give us a warning, to draw attention to the abuses that prevail there and to help people with it.
So we should not offend people by calling them liars because that's unfair.

The following text was actually the text i wrote but i deleted it because i think it does not change anything. It is just a repetition of what I have already said but here it is. I said all the necessary has to be said, and my intention was to warn and to give the advise to get in touch with an exorcist, because there are things that we cannot solve on our own when we have been in contact with evil people...
Look out for a good exorcist.

God's blessings to all of you all and the Cathinfo owner.
My deleted (or better modified) message was:
I can understand that there are things that do not need to be said because they do not help but can also harm people, so in this case if a person So when a person says, I stop, I´am done, we have to accept it without immediately addressing and offending the person. That´s insane.
I said to much on this topic. I did not write down the numbers of the phone calls at that time, I'm sorry. Do not forget that all this happens many many years ago. I saw the name of the city on my phone and the number was unknown to me. One must not forget that many years have passed by now, and I can not remember the name of the restaurant. It was at a place not far away from the so called "seminary", there were also other shops near by (we were not in Louisville). Look after small burn holes on the carpet at the seminary entrance. I repeat, it happened many years ago. I have already said everything and I do not want to reveal more details in order to protect others, who also saw these things and do not want me to mention them. We are not dealing with children playing here.
I will keep silent about it from now on. God's blessings to

Please read my post (a few posts above) regarding how it DOESN'T MATTER if Catholicus' testimony is true or completely made up.

I agree with you, Matthew, up to a point.  It does matter to know which stories are true or false, in the sense that if you accept a bunch of falsehoods about a person, this diminishes the actual true stories which should cause scandal.